Ostrakinda: A Game-Based Learning Toolkit for Ancient Mediterranean Cities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.266

Keywords:

Architectural Education, Game-based Learning, Mediterranean, Priene, Toolkit

Abstract

The study develops the 'Ostrakinda' toolkit for teaching morphologies of ancient Mediterranean cities. The methodology consists of a triple structure involving design, play, and analysis phases. In the design phase, the level of interest and actual demands of students regarding game-based learning (GBL) and ancient cities were explored through pre-experiments. The play phase involved experimental studies conducted in courses and workshops, where both physical and digital toolkits were tested by a total of 331 students. The analysis phase aimed to evaluate the impact of the game by systematically addressing five research questions. The results of the paired t-test confirm a significant difference in scores before and after playing the game, thus validating the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Additionally, Chi-square (X2) tests revealed significant relationships between the form of play and the level of abstraction in the game outputs. Individual and group experiences during gameplay were associated with various interactions, and group experiences particularly fostered competitive and collaborative learning. The extensive analysis using the GBL Design Scale, comprising ten critical factors (GBL-Fn), showed that the challenge factor (F8) had the weakest values, while fantasy (F5) and narrative (F6) had the highest values in the correlation matrix. Overall, the study contributes methodologically and contextually to the existing literature, offering valuable findings for the future development of similar strategies in architectural education. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this interdisciplinary study, particularly with regards to technical, cognitive, and archaeological aspects. Nevertheless, the clear and effective structure of the game holds promise as a valuable tool for learning.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Muhammet Ali Heyik, Yıldız Technical University

M. Ali Heyik, after graduating from the Department of Architecture in 2015, worked as an architect in several architectural offices in Istanbul, gaining experience through notable restoration projects in the Harem section of Topkapı Palace. In 2016, he was accepted into the Master's degree program in Architectural Design at Yıldız Technical University, where he successfully completed his studies in 2019, with a thesis entitled "Baths as Cultural Values and Mapping on Istanbul Baths." Since 2016, M. Ali Heyik has been actively engaged as a research assistant in the Department of Architecture at Yıldız Technical University, focusing on his ongoing PhD studies. His research endeavors encompass diverse fields, including design research, computational design, game-based learning, participatory design, collective intelligence, and ecosocial transition in coastal areas. M. Ali Heyik further enriched his academic journey by pursuing his doctoral research at UPM-Polytechnic University of Madrid as part of the Erasmus program between 2021 and 2022. Additionally, from 2022 to 2023, he conducted research at Granada University as part of the Tubitak 2214/A project

Meral Erdoğan, Yıldız Technical University

Prof. Dr. Meral Erdoğan completed her undergraduate education in Architecture at İstanbul State Engineering and Architecture Academy (İDMMA) Architecture Department (İstanbul, 1977), her master's degree in İDMMA Architectural Design Master's Program (İstanbul, 1979), and her doctoral studies in the Architecture Program at İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Science (İstanbul, 1986). In 1980, Prof. Dr. Meral Erdoğan started her teaching and research activities as a Research Assistant at İDMMA Kadıköy Faculty of Engineering and Architecture. She became an Associate Professor at Yıldız Technical University (YTU), Faculty of Architecture in 1995 and a Professor in 2015. From 1991 to 2022, she conducted education and research activities in the field of Design Computing, Design Research, and Design Technologies in the Architecture Department's Computational Design discipline and in the Graduate Program in Computer Aided Architectural Design at YTU.

Togan Tong

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Togan Tong graduated from Yıldız University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture in 1988 as an Architect. In 1990, he graduated from Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Building Science Graduate Program as a Master Architect. In 2000, he received his Ph.D. from Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Building Information Doctorate Program. He has been working as an Associate Professor at UAK since April 1, 2021. Togan Tong, who has been continuing his academic career at Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Department of Building Information since 1992, has been working as a faculty member in the Department of Architecture in the 2021-2022 Spring semester. Togan Tong, who is the director of Undergraduate, Postgraduate and Doctorate courses on subjects such as Computer Aided Design and Modeling, Digital Simulation Environments and Digital Architectural Thinking, Computational Design, Rule-Based Designs, Integrated Design Technologies, Building Information Technologies, conducts Computer Aided Design courses at different foundation universities. He continues his Digital Design Education Consultancy at the Istanbul Metropolitan Branch of the Chamber of Architects.

References

Abbasoğlu, H. (1999). Anadolu’da antik çağda konut. Tarihten Günümüze Anadolu’da Konut ve Yerleşme, ed. Y. Sey, Tepe Mimarlık Kültürü Merkezi Yay., Ist, 44-81.

Abt, C. C. (1987). Serious games. University press of America.

Admiraal, W., Huizenga, J., Akkerman, S., & Ten Dam, G. (2011). The concept of flow in collaborative game-based learning. Computers in human behavior, 27(3), 1185-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.013

Andrasek, A., & Sanchez, J. A. A. (2012). Bloom: Distributed Urban Game. Wonder Series as part of 2012 Olympics and Paralympics.

Bai, N., Ye, W., Li, J., Ding, H., Pienaru, M. I., & Bunschoten, R. (2018). Customised Collaborative Urban Design-A Collective User-based Urban Information System through Gaming. eCAADe Conference in Lodz, Poland, 419-428.

Baran, M. (1974). Children's Games. Expedition, 17(1), 21.

Becerra Santacruz, A. (2019). The Architecture of ScarCity Game-The craft and the digital as an alternative design process.

Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., D'ursi, A., & Fiore, V. (2013). A serious game model for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 5(4), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399180.2399185

Berkeley, E. P. (1968, December). The New Gamesmanship'. In Architectural Forum (Vol. 58, pp. 58-63).

Bonta, J. P. (1979). Simulation games in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 33(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1424458

Brandt, E., & Messeter, J. (2004, July). Facilitating collaboration through design games. In Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices-Volume 1 (pp. 121-131).

Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Design for scalability: A case study of the River City curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 353-365.

Dodig, M. B., & Groat, L. N. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Companion to Games in Architecture and Urban Planning: Tools for Design, Teaching, and Research. Routledge.

Duke, R. (1964). Gaming simulation in urban research. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Community Development Services.

Farinea, C., Mayer, I., Ingrassia, M., van Apeldoorn, N., Leone, D., Goosen, Z., ... & Villodres, S. (2021). Public play space: turning urban space into public places with games and play.

Feldt, A. G. (1966). Operational gaming in planning education. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 32(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10. 1080/01944366608978485

Feldt, A. G. (1995). Thirty-five years in gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 26(4), 448-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878195264006

Figueiredo, B., Costa, E. C., Araújo, B., Fonseca, F., Mendes, D., Jorge, J. A., & Duarte, J. P. (2014). Interactive tabletops for architectural visualization: combining stereoscopy and touch interfaces for cultural heritage. eCAADe Conference, 585-592.

Fuller, R. B. (1969). The World Game. Ekistics, 286-292.

Gates, C. (2015). Antik kentler: antik Yakındoğu, Mısır, Yunan ve Roma'da kentsel yaşamın arkeolojisi. Koç Üniversitesi.

Green, C. (1979). Playing Design Games. Journal of Architectural Education, 33(1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1979.10758205

Gutenschwager, G. (1979). Gaming, education and change. Journal of Architectural Education, 33(1), 30-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/104648 83.1979.10758207

Gutiérrez, J. G. (2018). Gamificando el análisis del turismo. In Producció i consum de responsabilitat (pp. 11-36). Publicacions URV.

Habitat, U. (2016). Using Minecraft for Community Participation.

Hartt, M., Hosseini, H., & Mostafapour, M. (2020). Game on: Exploring the effectiveness of game-based learning. Planning Practice & Research, 35(5), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1778859

Hendricks, F. H. (1960, November). Planning operational gaming experiment. In A Paper Prepared for the Northern California Chapter, American Institute of Planners Professional Meeting on’New Ideas in Planning (Vol. 19).

Kalay, Y. E., & Jeong, Y. (2003). A collaborative design simulation game. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 1(4), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1260/147807703773633446

Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.

Keslacy, E. (2015). Fun and games: the suppression of architectural authoriality and the rise of the reader. Footprint, 101-124. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.9.2.869

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Política y Sociedad, 43(3), 127-130.

Maas, W. G. M., Graafland, A. D., van Bilsen, A., Batstra, B., Castro, C. P., & van Susteren, A. W. C. (2007). Space Fighter. The evolutionary city (game). Actar-Distribution Inc.

May, H. B. (1979). The potentiality of gaming-simulation in architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 33(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883 .1979.10758202

Markopoulou, A. (2020). Smart who? collective intelligence urban design models. Architectural Design, 90(3), 122-127. doi:10.1002/ad.2578

Perez, S. (2016). Pokémon Go tops Twitter's daily users, sees more engagement than Facebook. Tech Crunch. https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/13/ pokemon-go-tops-twitters-daily-users-sees-more-engagement-than-facebook/

Pojani, D., & Rocco, R. (2020). Edutainment: Role-playing versus serious gaming in planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X20902251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X20902

Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in human behavior, 63, 50-58.

Sanoff, H. (1979). Collaborative design processes. Journal of Architectural Education, 33(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1979.1 0758204

Schran, H., & Kumpf, D. (1972). Environmental Games in the United States: A Review of a Decade of Confusion. Simulation & Games, 3(4), 464-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687817200300405

Shi, Y. R., & Shih, J. L. (2015). Game factors and game-based learning design model. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2015. doi:10.1155/2015/549684

Stojanovski, T. (2020). Role-playing planning games as educational tool-Experiences of teaching with educational games in Sweden. eCAADe Conference, 38, 525-534. https://doi:10.52842/conf.ecaade.2020.1.525

Summers, L. H. (1979). Operational games in architecture and design. Journal of Architectural Education, 33(1), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046488 3.1979.10758201

Tan, E. (2017). Play the city: Games informing the urban development. Jap Sam Books.

Thornton, B. (1971). Gaming Techniques for City Planning: A Bibliography.

Tóth, E. (2015). Potential of games in the field of urban planning. In New Perspectives in Game Studies: Central and Eastern European Game Studies Conference (pp. 71-91).

Treib, M. (1982). Of cardboard cities and public politics. Journal of Architectural Education, 35(3), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1982.10 758294

Vaez Afshar, S., Eshaghi, S., Varinlioglu, G., & Balaban, Ö. (2021). Evaluation of Learning Rate in a Serious Game-Based on Anatolian cultural heritage.

Varinlioglu, G., Aslankan, A., Alankus, G., & Mura, G. (2017). ’Raising Awareness for Digital Heritage through Serious Game’. In 35th International Conference on EducationandResearchinComputerAidedArchitecturalDesign in Europe (p. 31).

Vaajakallio, K., & Mattelmäki, T. (2014). Design games in codesign: as a tool, a mindset and a structure. CoDesign, 10(1), 63-77.

Varinlioglu, G., & Halici, S. M. (2019). Gamification of Heritage through augmented reality. eCAADe Conference, 37, 513-518. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2019.1.513

Wycherley, R. E. (1962). How the Greeks built cities. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2023

How to Cite

Heyik, M. A., Erdoğan, M., & Tong, T. (2023). Ostrakinda: A Game-Based Learning Toolkit for Ancient Mediterranean Cities . ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 11(2), 838–865. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.266

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

COPYRIGHT POLICY 

1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.

2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:

The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.

The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.

If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.

The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues. 

The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs. 

3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles. 

4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material. 

5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name. 

6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.