Assessment Method of Modern Buildings Constructed in a Historical Area; as a Case Study İMÇ Blocks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.265Keywords:
İMÇ blocks, modern heritage, historical settlement, site and facade analysisAbstract
The addition of new modern layers to the historic urban settings is a significant issue in conserving the historic area's characteristics. Thus, a method of evaluation for modern buildings built in historical areas is being devel oped. The objective includes assessing the maintenance of the historic area's qualities and designing qualified modern buildings. These two issues were evaluated by assessing the example of İstanbul Drapers and Yard Goods Bazaar, İMÇ blocks. First, historical house settlements in the construction area of İMÇ (1933) and then characteristics of İMÇ blocks (1967) were analyzed. In terms of mass proportions, the position of courtyards, circulation areas, street and square relations, and vistas, site plan organizations from 1933 and 1967 were compared, while the proportions and architectural details of the façades were compared. The assessment criteria for the evaluation of modern buildings and their impact on historical areas were determined based on international preservation standards and charters. The conservation criteria include respecting the qualities, vistas, and landmarks of existing historic structures, being recognizable and reversible, responding to the demands of the area, and providing new views, juxtapositions, and textures. Modern heritage criteria include technical, land use, aesthetic, historical, socioeconomic, intangible, canonical, and reference qualities. As a result, it is seen that the İMÇ blocks were designed in harmony with the environment and increased the spatial quality of the area. Even though the İMÇ blocks are large-scale due to architectural constraints, the orientation of the blocks, the placement of courtyards leading to the Süleymaniye Mosque, and the transverse and longitudinal continuous circulation between the blocks respected historical texture. Despite the size of the masses, their heights and architectural elements are consistent with the traditional house layout.
Metrics
References
Aslanoğlu, İ. (1988). Modernizmin Tanımı, Sınırları, Erken Yirminci Yüzyıl Mimarlığında Farklı Tavırlar, ODTÜ Mfd, 8(1), 59-66. http://jfa.arch.metu.edu.tr/archive/0258-5316/1988/cilt08/sayi_1/59-66.pdf
Australia ICOMOS. (2013). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. http://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/ uploads/The-Burra-Charter-2013-Adopted-31.10.2013.pdf
Bergeron, L. (2003). L’impact de la modernisation économique et le patrimoine industriel. In R. van Oers & S. Haraguchi (Eds.). Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage (pp.17-24). World Heritage Papers 5, Paris, France. https://whc.unesco.org/document/12/
Bilgin Altınöz, G. (2010). Tarihi Dokuda ‘Yeni’nin İnşası’, Ege Mimarlık 4(75), 18-26. http://egemimarlik.org/75/index.php
Boelens, L. (2003). Mobility – a story of floating heritage passing. In R. van Oers & S. Haraguchi (Eds.), Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage (pp.33-42). World Heritage Papers 5, Paris, France. https://whc.unesco.org/document/12/
Bozdoğan, S. & Kasaba, R. (2005). Türk Mimari Kültüründe Modernizm: Genel Bir Bakış. In R. Kasaba & S. Bozdoğan (Eds.), Türkiye’de Modernleşme ve Ulusal Kimlik (pp. 118-135). Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.
Cantacuzino, S. (2003). Community building and representation, In R. van Oers & S. Haraguchi (Eds.), Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage (pp. 51-62). World Heritage Papers 5, Paris, France. https://whc.unesco.org/document/12/
Cook, C. & Richards, I. (1993). Modern Movement Documentation as a Central Resource for Architectural Education, Second DOCOMOMO International Conference, 16–19 September 1992, pp. 68–72, Dessau, Germany.
Council of Europe Committee of Ministers. (1991). Recommendation no (91) 13 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Protection of the 20th Century Architectural Heritage. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublic CommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016804bde8d
Cünük, C. N., Sarıhan, F. Z. & Vural, N. H. (2013). İSTANBUL Manifaturacılar ve Kumaşçılar Çarşısı (İMÇ). In T. Örmecioğlu & İ. Erbaş (Eds.), DOCOMOMO_tr IX. Türkiye Mimarlığında Modernizmin Yerel Açılımları. Antalya.
Dennis, R. (2008). Cities in Modernity: Representations and Productions of Metropolitan Space, 1840-1930. New York Cambridge University Press.
English Heritage and Cabe. (2001). Building in context: new development in historic areas. London, England. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/ fileadmin/uploads/dc/Documents/building-in-context-new-development-in-historic-areas.pdf
Ergut, E. (2009). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlığı; Tanımlar, Sınırlar, Olanaklar. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, 13, 121-130.
Eyüpgiller, K. (2013). Tarihi Yarımada’daki Yenileme Alanlarında Kültürel Mirasın Korunması, Mimari ve Kentsel Koruma. In Z. Eres & K. K. Eyüpgiller (Eds.), Prof.Dr. Nur Akın'a Armağan. Yem Yayınları.
Frampton, K. (2003). The catalytic city: Between strategy and intervention. In R. van Oers & S. Haraguchi (Eds.), Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage (pp.71-80). World Heritage Papers 5, Paris, France. https://whc.unesco.org/document/12/
Gallagher, H. (2011). Toward A Framework for Preserving Mid-century Modern Resources: An Examination of Public Perceptions of The Sarasota School of Architecture. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Florida. http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/04/38/64/00001/GALLAGHER_N.pdf
Hendese Dergisi. (2016). İstanbul’da Mekansal Dönüşüme Bir Örnek Atatürk Bulvarı. http://www.hendesedergisi.com/yazardetay/23-72-istanbulda-mekansal-donusume-bir-ornek-ataturk-bulvari.aspx
ICOMOS. (1964). Venice Charter, International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites. Venice, Italy. http://www.icomos.org.
ICOMOS. (1987). Washington Charter – Charter for the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas, Washington D.C., USA. https://www.icomos.org /images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/towns_e.pdf
ICOMOS. (1972). Resolutions of the Symposium on the Introduction of Contemporary Architecture into Ancient Groups of Buildings at the 3rd ICOMOS General Assembly. https://www.icomos.org/en/resources /charters-and-texts/180-articles-en-francais/chartes-et-normes/383-resolutions-of-the-symposium-on-the-introduction-of-contemporary-architecture-into-ancient-groups-of-buildings-at-the-3rd-icomos-general-assembly
ICOMOS. (1973). Resolutions of the Symposium Devoted to the Study of "The Streetscape in Historic Towns". http://www.international.icomos.org /publications/lausanne1973/lausanne1973-10.pdf
ICOMOS. (1975a). The Resolutions of Bruges: Principles Governing the Rehabilitation of Historic Towns. https://www.icomos.org/fr/ress ources/publications/librairie-de-l-icomos/116-english-categories/resources/publications/299-isc-historic-towns
ICOMOS. (1975b). Resolutions on the International Symposium on the Conservation of Smaller Historic Towns at the 4th ICOMOS General Assembly. https://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts/180-articles-en-francais/chartes-et-normes/384-resolutions-of-the-international-symposium-on-the-conservation-of-smaller-historic-towns-at-the-4th-icomos-general-assembly
ICOMOS. (1999). Charter on the Built Vernacular Heritage (1999): Ratified by the ICOMOS 12th General Assembly Mexico 1999. http://www.internatio nal.icomos.org/charters/ vernacular_e.pdf
ICOMOS. (2011a). The Valletta Principles for the Safeguarding and Management of Historic Cities, Towns and Urban Areas: Adopted by the 17th ICOMOS General Assembly on 28 November 2011. https://civvih.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Valletta-Principles-GA-_EN_FR_28_11_2011.pdf
ICOMOS. (2011b). Madrid Document, Approaches for the Conservation of Twentieth-Century Architectural Heritage. Madrid. https://www.aeppas 20.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/10/03-DM-ingles.pdf
ICOMOS. (2013). ICOMOS Turkey Architectural Heritage Conservation Charter. http://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSTR_tr0784192001542192602.pdf
ISMD. (2011). İstanbul Historic Peninsula Site Management Plan. BİMTAŞ A.Ş. http://www.alanbaskanligi.gov.tr/evrak/lplan2100_eng.pdf
İMÇ. (2022). İMÇ. https://imc.org.tr/
İstanbul Manifaturacılar Çarşısı Proje Müsabakası. (1958). İstanbul Manifaturacilar Çarşısı Proje Müsabakası. Mimarlar Odası Arkitekt Veritabanı 02(291), 87-92. http://dergi.mo.org.tr/dergiler/2/241/33 38.pdf
Kayın, E. (2001). 20. yüzyılın mimarlık mirasının belirlenmesine ilişkin kriterler ve koruma alanındaki ‘Yapı değeri’ kavramı üzerine bir irdeleme. In T. Kaprol (Eds.), 13. Yapı ve Yaşam Kongresi Modern Mimarlık Mirası (pp. 44-57). Bursa: Bursa Mimarlar Odası Yayınları.
Kızılkayak, G. (2009), İmeceden İMÇ’ye. İstanbul Manifaturacılar Çarşısı Yayınları.
Kök, S. (2016). 20. Yüzyıl Modern Mimarlık Mirasının Değerlendirilmesi: İMÇ Örneği [Assesment of 20th Century Modern Architecture Heritage: The Case of İmç]. Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul.
Madran, E. (2006). Modern Mimarlık Ürünlerinin Belgelenmesi ve Korunması Süreci Üzerine Bazı Notlar. Mimarlık, 332, pp.11-12.
Mısırlısoy, D. (2017). New Designs in Historic Context: Starchitecture vs Architectural Conservation Principles. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5(6), pp. 207-214.
Muramatsu, S. & Zenno, Y. (2003). How to evaluate, conserve and revitalize modern architecture in Asia. In R. van Oers & S. Haraguchi (Eds.), Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage (pp. 113-120). World Heritage Papers 5, Paris, France. https://whc.unesco.org/ document/12/
Oers, von Ron. (2003). Introduction to the Programme on Modern Heritage. In R.van Oers, S.Haraguchi (Eds.), Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage, 5, pp.7-15. Franca : UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Omay Polat, E. & Can, C. (2008). Modern mimarlık mirası kavramı: tanım ve kapsam. Megaron YTÜ Mim. Fak. E-Dergisi 3(2), pp. 177-186.
Özeren, S. (2008). Mimaride Kurgulanan Sanatın Tasarımda Oluşturduğu Bellek ve İMÇ Örneği [Creation of the memory through the usage of art in architectural design & IMC]. Unpublished Master Thesis, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul.
Parson, R. (2010). New Designs in Historic Settings. The Scottish Government. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/new-design-in-historic-settings.pdf
Pervititch, J. (2012). Istanbul in the insurance maps of Jacques Pervititch. AXA Oyak Holding.
Prudon, T., H., M. (2008). Preservation of Modern Architecture. Wiley, Hoboken, N.J.
Rıza, M. & Doratlı, N. (2015). The Critical Lacuna Between New Contextually Juxtaposed and Freestyle Buildings in Historic Settings. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 32(3), pp. 234-257.
Salt Araştırma. (2022a, January 9). İstanbul Manifaturacılar Çarşısı: Maket fotoğrafları- Istanbul Textile Traders’ Market: Model photographs. https://archives.saltresearch.org/handle/123456789/204618
Salt Araştırma. (2022b, January 9). İstanbul Manifaturacılar Çarşısı - Istanbul Textile Traders’ Market. https://archives.saltresearch.org/handle/12 3456789/79246
Saner T., Ar B., Göçmen D., Kümet E., Denktaş E. & Özışık S. (2007). Saraçhane Bölgesi’nde Kentsel Dönüşüm. Tarihsel ve Sosyal Topografya Akademik Araştırma Projesi. İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi.
Sözen, M. (1996). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türk Mimarisi. Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
Szmygin, B. (2012). Protection of Modern Architecture- Contemporary Theory and Practice. http://www.gdynia.pl/g2/2012_11/60542_fileot.pdf.
Tekeli, D. (2012). Mimarlık Zor Sanat. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Tekeli, D. (2018). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlık Mirasımız Korunamaz mı? Mimar.ist, 62, pp. 42-44.
Tekeli, D. (2022, Jabuary 5). Seminer: İstanbul Manifaturacılar Çarşısı. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
Tekeli, D., Sisa, S., & Hepgüler, M. (1960). İstanbul Manifaturacilar Çarşisi Proje Müsabakasi. Arkitekt, 1960-03(300), pp. 122–132. http://dergi.mo.org.tr /dergiler/2/241/3338.pdf
The Getty Conservation Institute. (2015). Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment. In An Annotated Bibliography, S. Lardinois, A. P. Arato Gonçalves, L. Matarese, & S. Macdonald (Eds.), The Getty Conservatıon Instıtute, Los Angeles.
UNESCO. (2005). Vienna Momerandum on World heritage and contemporary architecture- managing the historic urban landscape. Vienna, Italy. http://www.unesco.org.
UNESCO. (2003). Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage. World Heritage Papers 5, Paris, France.
UNESCO. (1976). Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and Contemporary Role of Historic Areas. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/ 2005/whc05-15ga-inf7e.doc
Yavuz, D. (2008). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlığı Mimarlık–Sanat Birlikteliğinde 1950-70 Aralığı. Mimarlık, 344.
Yüceer, H. & İpekoğlu, B. (2012). An architectural assessment method for new exterior additions to historic buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 13 (4), pp. 419-425.
Zenger, R. & Karatosun, M. (2001). 20. Yüzyıl Mimari Mirası Koruma Ölçütlerinin Belirlenmesinde Analitik Yaklaşım. In T. Kaprol (Eds.), 13. Yapı ve Yaşam Kongresi Modern Mimarlık Mirası (pp.57-63). Bursa Mimarlar Odası Yayınları.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 