The Implementation of Sustainable Approaches in the Architectural Design Studio Developing Architectural Designs Using the Solar Envelope Method


  • Fatih Canan Asst. Prof. Dr. Selçuk University, Department of Architecture, Konya
  • Mehmet Bahadır Tosunlar Res. Assist. Selçuk University, Department of Architecture, Konya



Architectural design education, sustainable architecture, solar architecture, energy conscious design, solar envelope concept


Teaching students the notion of sustainability during their architectural education is of great importance. The architectural design studio course is the most important environment in which theory and practice can be brought together. In this study, the development of architectural design by using the solar envelope method–which can be considered within the scope of sustainable architectur–was examined in the architectural design studio course in the department of architecture in our university. In the design studio, students had the opportunity to directly observe the impact and use of scientific information that is often difficult to obtain and access. The advantages and disadvantages that appear during the application of this mentioned method was identified based on the observations that were made, and feedback was provided by the students. This method helped the students in conceiving architectural projects in the context of sustainability in a more applied way rather than as a superficial and solely theoretic concept. Through this method, students have gained additional sensitivity regarding solar architecture and perceived its effect on form and space. According to the feedback obtained from students, the most important disadvantage was design freedom. Students found it stringent to be bound to make their designs within very well established boundaries from the early stages. The authors think that the limitations increased creativity and allowed interesting and unusual solutions. The projects were all formed on the basis of the rhythm of nature, which attached more value and meaning to architecture.



Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Fatih Canan, Asst. Prof. Dr. Selçuk University, Department of Architecture, Konya

Fatih Canan, Graduated from the department of architecture of Selçuk University in 1997. He obtained his European Master degree in architecture and sustainable development from Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in 2001 and his PhD degree from Selçuk University in 2008. Currently, Canan is holding the position of Assist. Prof. Dr. in Selçuk University, Department of Architecture. His domain of research is sustainable architecture.

Mehmet Bahadır Tosunlar, Res. Assist. Selçuk University, Department of Architecture, Konya

M. Bahadır Tosunlar, graduated from Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Department of Architecture in 2006. He worked for various positions in field of architecture. Afterwards, He received master’s degree in 2015 from Selçuk University Institute of Science by completing Architectural Restoration Master Programme. Currently, Tosunlar is holding the position of research assistant in Selçuk University, Department of Architecture and continues doctorate in Selçuk University Architectural Restoration Phd Programme.


Canan, F., Korumaz, M. & Güleç, S.A. (2006). Vision evaluation of the Students in architecture about sustainable architecture in a local context in Konya / Turkey, Proceedings PLEA 2006, Hes.So, Université de Genève, Vol.2, pp. 785 -791.

Canan, F. (2008). A trial of model for controlling the parameters in energy efficient architectural design, PhD thesis, Selçuk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Konya.

Cakmak Yilmaz, B. (2015) "Solar energy potential of Konya and architectural design criterias for solar energy efficiency," 2015 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Palermo, pp. 1463-1469.

doi: 10.1109/ICRERA.2015.7418650

Capeluto, I.G. & Shaviv, E. (2001). On the use of solar volume for determining the urban fabric, Solar Energy, Vol. 70-3, pp. 275-280.

Capeluto, I.G. (2003). Energy performance of the self- shading building envelope, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 35, pp. 327-336.

Capeluto, I.G., Yezioro, A. Bleiberg, T. & Shaviv, E. (2006). Solar rights in the design of urban spaces, Plea 2006, Proceedings PLEA 2006, Hes.So, Université de Genève, Vol.1, pp. 689-694.

Cotton, J.F. (1996). Solid modeling as a tool for constructing solar envelopes, Automation in Construction, Vol. 5, pp. 185-192.

De Herde, A. & Dartevelle, O. (2010). U.C.L. and sustainable architecture education in Belgium, Le Carré Bleu, Feuille Internationale d’Architecture, No. 3-4, pp.53-56.

Dimitrova, E. (2014). The ‘sustainable development’ concept in urban planning education: lessons learned on a Bulgarian path, Journal of Cleaner Production,Vol. 62, pp. 120–127.

El- Zeiny, R.M.A. (2010). Sustainability in the Education of Interior designers in Egypt, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 38, pp. 122 – 131.

Forwood, B. (1994). Expressing sustainability in architectural form: energy and environment as architectural metaphors, Renewable Energy, Vol. 5, part 2, pp. 1132-1134.

Karol, E. (2006). Using campus concerns about sustainability as an educational opportunity: a case study in architectural design, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14, pp. 780–786.

Granadeiro, V., Duarte, J. P., Correia, J.R. & Leal, V.M.S. (2013).

Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: Integrating architectural design systems and energy

simulation, Automation in Construction, Vol. 532, pp.196–209.

Houpert, D. (2003). Approche inverse pour la résolution de contraintes solaires et visuelles dans le projet architectural et urbain- développement et application du logiciel SVR. Université de Nantes, thèse de doctorat, Ecole Doctorale Mécanique, Thermique et Génie Civil, Nantes.

Khan, A.Z., Vandevyvere, H. & Allacker, K. (2013). Design for the ecological age, rethinking the role of sustainability in architectural education, Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 67:2, pp. 175-185.

Knowles, R.L. (1981) Sun rhytm form. Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Knowles, R.L. (2003). The solar envelope: its meaning for energy and buildings, Energy and Buildings Vol. 35, pp. 15–25.

Lefèvre, P. & D’ Orazio, A. (2010). L’enseignement de l’architecture durable en France : l’experience de vingt ans d’enseignement a l‘ecole d’architecture de Paris la Villette, Le Carré Bleu, Feuille Internationale d’Architecture, No. 3-4,pp. 23-32.

Lenzholzer, S. & Brown, R.D. (2013). Climate-responsive landscape architecture design education, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 61, pp. 89-99.

Littlefair, P. (1998). Passive solar urban design: ensuring the penetration of solar energy into the city, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 2, pp. 303-326.

Maciel, A.A., Ford, B. & Lamberts, R. (2007). Main influences on the design philosophy and knowledge basis to bioclimatic integration into architectural design- The example of best practices, Building and Environment, Vol. 42, pp. 3762–3773.

Morello, E. & Ratti, C. (2009). Sunscapes: ‘Solar envelopes’ and the analysis of urban DEMs, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 33, pp. 26–34.

Noble, D. & Kensek, K. (1998). Computer generated solar envelopes in architecture, The Journal of Architecture, Vol. 3, pp. 117-127.

Paramitaa, B. & Koerniawan, M.D. (2013). Solar envelope assessment in tropical region building case study: vertical settlement in Bandung, Indonesia, Procedia Environmental Science, Vol. 17, pp. 757 – 766.

Pereira, F.O.R., Silva, C.A.N. & Turkienikz, B. (2001). A methodology for sunlight urban planning: a computer based solar and sky vault obstruction Analysis, Solar Energy, Vol. 70, pp. 217-226.

Perrin, N. (2004). Approche inverse pour la résolution de contraintes structurelles dans le projet architectural. Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Nancy. mémoire de DEA, Centre de Recherche en Architecture et Ingénerie, Nancy.

Raboudi, K., Belkaïd, A. & Ben Saci, A. (2012). Satisfaction of the solar bounding box constraints, Proceedings PLEA 2012, Centro de Investigación de la Arquitectura y la Ciudad, PUCP.

Siret, D. (1997). Propositions pour une approche déclarative des ambiances dans le projet architectural- application à l’ensoleillement, Université de Nantes-Isıtem, Ecole d’Architecture de Nantes, thèse de doctorat, Nantes.

Siret, D., Houpert, S. (2004). A geometrical framework for solving sunlighting problems within CAD systems, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 36, pp. 343–351.

Siret, D., Harzallah, A. (2006). Architecture et contrôle de l’ensoleillement. International Building Performance Simulation Association Conferencs (IBPSA), Saint Pierre, Réunion.

Taleghani, M., Ansari, H. R. & Jennings, P. (2011). Sustainability in architectural education: a comparison of Iran and Australia, Renewable Energy, Vol. 36 , pp. 2021-2025.

Topaloğlu, B. (2003). Solar envelope and form generation in architecture, Middle East Technical University, master thesis, the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara.

Yannas, S. (2010). La formation a la conception durable au Royaume Uni, Architectural Association School of Architecture London, UK, Le Carré Bleu, Feuille Internationale d’Architecture, No. 3-4, pp.43-52.

Yüksek, I. (2013). The Evaluation of architectural education in the scope of sustainable architecture, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 89, pp. 496 – 508.

Wright, J. (2003). Introducing sustainability into the architecture curriculum in the United. States, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 100-105.




How to Cite

Canan, F., & Tosunlar, M. B. (2016). The Implementation of Sustainable Approaches in the Architectural Design Studio Developing Architectural Designs Using the Solar Envelope Method. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 4(1), 14–33.