A Conceptual Approach to Abandoned Industrial Sites within the Scope of Brownfield in the Context of Regenerative Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2024.283Keywords:
Regenerative design, Brownfield, Abandoned industrial areaAbstract
Built environments and technologies produced to provide for people's requirements can also create environmental problems. The approaches used in the management of these problems are generally technology-based, focusing on reducing the damage to the environment, considering human beings independent from nature. As a critical view of these approaches, regenerative design has been placed in the literature. In contrast to environmental approaches that focus on the problem in design, regenerative design focuses on "turning the problem into potential". In this article, abandoned industrial areas (AIA) within the brownfield (BF) context of the degraded environment are discussed as one of the examples of the concept of turning the problem into potential in the built environment. These areas are problematic with intertwined ecological, sociological, economic, etc. degraded environments at different scales. However, they are built environments that can produce ecological, cultural heritage, social, etc. values as a result of their regeneration within the framework of their potentials.In this article, although not defined in the context of regenerative design and renewal, the projects implemented on AIA within the scope of BF, which can be evaluated in the context of transforming the problem into potential, are selected and analyzed. These projects are cases that have been successfully managed in the design, implementation and life processes, where the community and professionals have participated in a coordinated partnership, have been recognized globally with national and international awards. The lack of a systematic approach based on the different site-specific degradations in the BF in the regeneration of the analyzed projects has been seen as a gap in the literature. The aim of the article is to present an approach that can integrate different disciplines in a joint cross-section with a holistic approach to the area and to address the issue within the scope of the regenerative design process.
Metrics
References
Adams, D., De Sousa, C., and Tiesdell, S., (2010). Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches, Urban Studies, vol. 47(1), pp. 75-104.
Alker, S., Joy, V., Roberts, P., and Smith, N., (2020). The Definition of Brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 43, pp 43-69.
APA, (2010). REUSE Creating Community-based Brownfiel Redevelopment Strategies. Environmental Protection Agency Press, USA.
Apak, H., & Tuna Taygun, G., (2020). Rejeneratif Tasarım: Sorunu Potansiyele Çevirme, Kahverengi Alanlardan Yaşam Merkezi Kentsel Yeşil Alanlara: Fudidora Parkı, MUSEO DEL ACERO HORNO 3 Müzesi, Meksika. Yapı Dergisi, vol. 457, pp.20-25.
Apak, H. (2022). Kahverengi Alanlardaki Yapıların Kirlenmişlik ve Bozulmuşluk Bağlamında Yenilenmesine Yönelik Çevresel Risk Tabanlı Yaklaşım Önerisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, yıldız teknik üniversitesi fen bilimleri enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Baskaya, T., (2010). Ways to Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration in Istanbul, ITU journal A/Z, vol. 7(2), pp. 74-88.
BERI, Brownfield European Regeneration Initiative, https://keep.eu/projects/14940/Brownfield-s-Europe-Regener-EN/, 09.09. 2020
CABERNET, (2006). Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report. Land Quality Management Group (LQMG), University of Nottingham Press, United Kingdom.
Cengizkan, M., (2006). Endüstri Yapılarında Yeniden İşlevlendirme: ‘İş’i Biten Endüstri Yapıları Ne ‘İş’e Yarar?, Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi Bülten, vol. 45(3), pp. 9-13.
Cole, R., J., (2012). Regenerative design and development: current theory and
practice. Building Research & Information, vol.40, pp. 1-6.
Cole, R., J., (2012). Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building
Research & Information, vol.40, pp. 39-53.
Du Plessis, C. (2012). Towards a regenerative paradigm for the built environment. Building Research & Information, vol. 40, pp.7-22.
Dixon, T., Raco, M., Catney, P., and Lerner, D., N., (2008). Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: Liveable Places from Problem Spaces. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (1999). A Sustainable Brownfields Model Framework. EPA Press, Washington.
Ergen, M., (2013). A New Methodology Proposal For Urban Regeneration of Brownfield Areas; Case Study Of Zonguldak City Turkey, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Spatial Planning of Dortmund University of Technology, Germany.
Gorman, H., S., (2003). Brownfields in Historical Context, Environmental Practice, vol.5(1), pp. 21-24.
Heberle, L., & Wernstedt, K. (2006). Understanding Brownfields Regeneration in the US, Local Environment, vol. 11(5), pp. 479-497.
HOMBRE, (2013). Holistic Management of Brownfield Regeneration, EU Seventh Framework Programme, Land Quality Press.
Ispalar, A., Cahantemur, R., Beceren, Ö. and Öztürk, A., C., (2010). Securing Land for Urban Transformation Through Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration – the Case of Eskisehir, Turkey, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 22(1), pp. 241–258.
Köksal, G., & Ahunbay, Z., (2006). İstanbul’daki Endüstri Mirası İçin Koruma ve Yeniden Kullanım Önerileri, İtu dergisi/a, vol:5 (2), pp. 125-136.
Kılınç, G. (2016). Brownfield Redevelopment in Turkey, as a Tool for Sustainable Urbanization. Sustainable Urbanization, Intech Press.
Mang P. & Reed, B. (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research & Information, vol.35, pp. 674-680.
Mang, P., & Haggard, B., (2016). Regenerative development and design: a framework for evolving sustainability. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New York.
Mang P. & Reed, B. (2020). Regenerative development and design, sustainable built environment. Regenesis Group & Regenesis Institute for Regenerative Practice
Miller, D. (2012). Regenerative design: an exploration of process, practice, and the role of planners. The University of British Columbia Publisher.
Pahlen, G., & Franz, M., (2005). Sustainable Regeneration of European Brownfield
Sites: Criteria for Future Funding Decisions. Land Quality Press, England.
PROSIDE, https://keep.eu/projects/219/Promoting-sustainable-inner-u-EN/, 11.10.2020.
Reed, B., (2007). Shifting from ‘sustainability’ to regeneration. Building Research &
Information, vol.35, pp. 674-680.
RESCUE, (2004). Sustainability Assessment Tool for Brownfield Regeneration projects, Land Quality Press,.
REVIT, (2006). Revitalising Industrial Sites. University of Twente Netherlands Press.
TIMBRE, http://www.timbre-project.eu/, 15.10.2020.
Tillman Lyle, J. (1996). Regenerative design for sustainable development. John Wiley &Sons,
Vanheusden B., (2003). Towards a Legal Framework in the EU for Brownfield Redevelopment, European Energy and Environmental Law Review,
vol. 12(6), pp. 178-186.
Kilper H., wood G. (1995). The Rise of the Rustbelt, Routledge, UK.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.