A Comparative Analysis of the Change of Kula Traditional Turkish Housing Architecture in The Last 50 Years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2024.284Keywords:
Kula, Traditional Turkish house, Vernacular architecture, Architectural heritageAbstract
Kula is a district rich in cultural values. There are many historical and traditional residences in this region. These historical structures have undergone great and different changes over time. It is aimed to determine the transformations related to facade, structural element, and interior use in traditional houses. In addition, by looking at the obtained data, namely the architectural changes, it was determined as a secondary purpose to make suggestions about conservation.
The study consists of a combination of two basic methods: literature research and field research. After determining the subject of the study, written sources related to the subject were searched and the research was supported by field studies. The method of the study is the comparison of the data obtained from the sources and the evidence in the field study. Findings were obtained by analyzing the detected differences. In the study, which was carried out with the comparative analysis method, the historical process was examined, and information, architectural drawings and photographs were obtained about the conditions of the buildings 50 years ago. For this reason, scope of the study consists of both the data obtained and the houses that provide both conditions depending on the availability of these data today. In this context, the study is limited to 14 traditional Turkish residences in the Kula site, from which both historical data and locations can be accessed.
In the studies carried out in the field of architectural restoration and conservation, the current situations are examined in the studies on conservation. However, in this study, not only the current situation of the buildings, but also the conditions of the previous years and even the comparison of the data was obtained. Although this study was carried out within the scope of Kula district, it gives an idea about the change and usage of interiors of the residences.
Metrics
References
Altınel, N. N. (2021). İzmir ve Kula’da Ortodoks Sivil Mimari Mirası, İzmir: Yakın Kitabevi.
Asatekin, G. (1995). Restorasyon Teriminin Yüklendiği Yeni Anlam, Mimarlık Dergisi, (261), 66-69.
Ataş, A. (2017). Tarih, Kültür ve Lakaplarıyla Kula Katakeumene (Yanık Diyar), İzmir: TC Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Bozer, R. (1988). Kula Evleri. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
Erdem, A. (1983). Kula Tarihsel Sit, Sivil Mimarlık Örnekleri ve Sorunları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış lisansüstü araştırma tezi). Yıldız Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
ICOMOS. (1999). Icomos Geleneksel Mimari Mİras Tüzüğü. http://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSTR_tr0464062001536913566.pdf
Sütgibi, S. (2006) Kula ve Çevresinde Arazi Kullanımı. Geçmişten Geleceğe Köprü̈ Yanık Ülke Kula Sempozyumu, s. 167–176. Manisa
Tosun, İ. (1969). Milli Mimarimizde Kula Evleri. İzmir: Ticaret Matbaacılık T.A.Ş.
Tosun, İ. (1986) Tarihi Sosyal Kültürel ve Turizm Yönü İle Kula (2.Baskı), İzmir: Kula Belediyesi Yayınları.
TUİK. (2021). İlçe Nüfusu. https://www.tuik.gov.tr › duyuru › favori_raporlar adresinden edinilmiştir.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 