Developing Social Sustainability Criteria and Indicators in Urban Planning: A Holistic and Integrated Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.230

Keywords:

social sustainability, criteria and indicators of social sustainability, measurement of social sustainability, urban sustainability,

Abstract

One of the main reasons for today’s urban problems is the disregarding of social sustainability in urban interventions and the lack of an approach that evaluates social sustainability with all its issues as a universal and holistic one. In this context, the aim of this study is to determine and categorize social sustainability criteria, objectives, and indicators to measure and to assess social sustainability for ensuring the sustainability of cities that could be used in all urban areas and applied in urban planning.  Within this scope, social sustainability criteria, objectives, and indicators identified by international organizations and academic/scientific studies on different scales and in urban areas were evaluated systematically and analytically. A matrix has been generated according to the frequency of occurrence of social sustainability criteria and indicators. Although research studies focus on criteria and indicators according to scale, subject, and specified matters. It is a necessity to identify social sustainability criteria and indicators that can be used on every scale and in every urban area. Accordingly, ten criteria have been determined: population, accessibility, education and skills, health, housing, security, belonging, participation, social capital and social cohesion, urban life quality, satisfaction, and adequacy of services. Based on the criteria, targets, sub-targets, indicators, and indicator definitions for each criterion have been identified. However, the significance of each criterion is addressed, as well as the reasons for their necessity for social sustainability. This study proposes a universal, detailed, and holistic perspective for the measurement and assessment of social sustainability that enables the use of both quantitative and qualitative data together and envisages the use of mixed techniques in obtaining and evaluating data. In addition, criteria and indicator systems will be able to guide practitioners and policymakers to make decisions related to the social structure before and after the implementation of urban projects.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Hilay Atalay, Istanbul Technical University

Hilay Atalay is a Ph.D. candidate at Istanbul Technical University. She completed her undergraduate degree in the City and Regional Planning Department and her master’s degree in landscape architecture at Istanbul Technical University. She worked for the Bimtaş (Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality) and Okan University. She currently works as a part-time lecturer at Istanbul Gelişim University and Biruni University.

Nuran Zeren Gülersoy, Işık University

Prof. Nuran Zeren Gülersoy graduated as an architect from Istanbul Technical University (ITU), where she received her master’s degree and her doctorate in urban planning. She worked for the ITU between 1977-2018. Presently, she is the Department Head of Architecture at FMV Işık University. Her primary areas of interest are urban conservation, urban planning, and urban and landscape design. She is currently the General Secretary of International Planning History Society (IPHS) and serves as Europa Nostra member, ICOMOS CIVVIH Group and OWH Tourism working group.

References

Abed, A. R. (2016). Assessment of social sustainability: a comparative analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Urban Design and Planning, 170 (2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1680/jurdp.16.00020

Atanda, J. O. (2018). Developing a Social Sustainability Assessment Framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.023

Barron, L., & Gauntlett, E. (2002). Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project: Stage 1 Report-Model of social sustainability. WACOSS (Western Australia Council of Social Service).

Bramley, G, Power S, (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36 (1), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33129

Chan, E., & Lee, G. K. L. (2007). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85 (2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9089-3

Chiu, R. (2003). Social Sustainability, sustainable development and housing development: The experience of Hong Kong. In R. Forrest & J. Lee (eds.), Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (19-24), Routledge.

Colantonio, A. & Dixon, T. (2011). Measuring Socially Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Europe. Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development.

Cuthill, M. (2010). Strengthening the “Social” in Sustainable Development: Developing a Conceptual Framework for Social Sustainability in a Rapid Urban Growth Region in Australia. Sustainable Development, 18 (6), 362-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.397

Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417

European Commission. (2003). European Common Indicators Towards: A Local SustainabilityProfile. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/urban/pdf/eci_final_report.pdf

Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 9 (1), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068

EUROSTAT. (2013). Sustainable development In The European Union: 2013 Monitoring Report Of The EU Sustainable Development Strategy. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5760249/KS-02-13-237-EN.PDF.pdf/f652a97e-e646-456a-82fc-34949bbff956?t=1414777279000

Goosen, Z., & Cilliers, E. J. (2020). Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework. Social Indicators Research, 150, 835–866 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7

Khan, R. (2016). How Frugal Innovation Promotes Social Sustainability. Sustainability, 8(10), 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101034

MAK, Michael; Clinton J. PEACOCK. (2011, January 16-19). Social Sustainability: A Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia, 17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: towards some definitions, Hawke Research Institute working paper series; no. 27. University of South Australia.

Munzel,, A., Meyer-Waarden, L., & Galan, J.-P. (2018). The social side of sustainability: Well-being as a driver and an outcome of social relationships and interactions on social networking sites. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 130, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.031

Murphy, K. (2012). The social pillar of sustainable development: A literature review and framework for policy analysis. Sustainability Science Practice and Policy, 8 (1), 15-29 https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908081

OECD. (2000). Towards Sustainable Development Indicators to Measure Progress. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/towards-sustainable-development_9789264187641-en

OECD. (2011). Social Justice in the OECD – How Do the Member States Compare?. https://www.sgi-network.org/docs/studies/SGI11_Social_Justice_OECD.pdf

Omann, I ve Spangenberg, J.H. (2002, March 6-9)). Assessing Social Sustainability-The Social Dimension of Sustainability in a Socio-Economic Scenario, The 7th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics, Sousse. Tunisia.

Polese, M., & Stren, R. (2000). The Social Sustainability of Cities: Diversity and the Management of Change. University of Toronto Press.

UN. (2001). Indicators Of Sustainable Development: Guidelines And Methodologies. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/indisd-mg2001.pdf

UN. (2007). Indicators Of Sustainable Development: Guidelines And Methodologies. https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/guidelines.pdf

Yiftachel, O., & Hedgcock, D. (1993). Urban social sustainability: the planning of an Australian city. Cities, 10 (2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(93)90045-K

Yung, E. H. K., Chan, E. H. W., & Xu, Y. (2011). Sustainable Development and the Rehabilitation of a Historic Urban District - Social Sustainability in the Case of Tianzifang in Shanghai. Sustainable Development, 22(2), 95–112. doi:10.1002/sd.534

WHO. (1999). Environmental Health Indicators: Framework And Methodologies. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-SDE-OEH-99.10

Woodcraft, S. (2012). Understanding and measuring social sustainability. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 8 (2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.204

Downloads

Published

27-06-2023

How to Cite

Atalay, H., & Zeren Gülersoy, N. (2023). Developing Social Sustainability Criteria and Indicators in Urban Planning: A Holistic and Integrated Perspective. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 11(1), 01–23. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.230

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

COPYRIGHT POLICY 

1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.

2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:

The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.

The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.

If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.

The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues. 

The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs. 

3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles. 

4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material. 

5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name. 

6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.