The Architecture and Beyond of Tread and Riser
Keywords:
Analogy, Pattern, Perception, Riser, TreadAbstract
The primary constitution of stairs is the arrangement of horizontal and vertical measures known as tread and riser. This is the simplest arrangement that essentially conveys people from one level to the other with required comfort and safety. Steps are a universal symbol with multiple interpretations. They are the most generally used similes in art, philosophy and psychology. Stairs occupy a unique status in the built environment because they not only convey people, but also symbolize the psychological, spiritual and artistic aspects of human nature. The mental significance and symbolic connotations of steps are deeply rooted. Understanding the role of stairs in different spheres of human need and expression is crucial in approaching its design. The pattern of stairs is dependent on the type of materials and other related design considerations. It is one of the unique architectural entities that reflect the various facets of social, psychological, artistic, metaphysical and religious dimensions. The importance of physical activity in the rising sedentary life styles is linked to the design of building elements, especially the staircases. The advancement in technology has displaced the role of stairs into an inconsequential means of emergency escape. But the importance of physical activity in the rising sedentary lifestyle has revitalized the concept of stairs as an active building component. The mono functional approach to staircases in high-rise buildings, especially as the means of escape in emergency situations, indicates that the design of staircases as multi functional element is still under the confines of design explorations. This paper is an attempt to understand the concept of stairs not only from the evolutionary point of view, but also the associated metaphoric meanings and its emerging multi facet identity. The concept of vertical accessibility in the form of tread and riser arrangement makes stairs a timeless phenomenon. The approach to multi utility architectural elements stretches beyond physical functions and should integrate the various dimensions of space making and society. In this regard stairs are a pioneering entity that has a potential to relate to many spheres of human thinking. It is clearly evident that stairs are not bound within the confines of architecture. Their origin, utility and design have far more influential qualities that travel beyond the realms of function and symbolism. It is further discussed that in the present age stairs have become as an inspiration for physical well being. The issues involved with age based capabilities demand a certain design approach that satisfies the sensitive relation between built environments and building elements.
The primary constitution of stairs is the arrangement of horizontal and vertical measures known as tread and riser. This is the simplest arrangement that essentially conveys people from one level to the other with required comfort and safety. Steps are a universal symbol with multiple interpretations. They are the most generally used similes in art, philosophy and psychology. Stairs occupy a unique status in the built environment because they not only convey people, but also symbolize the psychological, spiritual and artistic aspects of human nature. The mental significance and symbolic connotations of steps are deeply rooted. Understanding the role of stairs in different spheres of human need and expression is crucial in approaching its design. The pattern of stairs is dependent on the type of materials and other related design considerations. It is one of the unique architectural entities that reflect the various facets of social, psychological, artistic, metaphysical and religious dimensions. The importance of physical activity in the rising sedentary life styles is linked to the design of building elements, especially the staircases. The advancement in technology has displaced the role of stairs into an inconsequential means of emergency escape. But the importance of physical activity in the rising sedentary lifestyle has revitalized the concept of stairs as an active building component. The mono functional approach to staircases in high-rise buildings, especially as the means of escape in emergency situations, indicates that the design of staircases as multi functional element is still under the confines of design explorations. This paper is an attempt to understand the concept of stairs not only from the evolutionary point of view, but also the associated metaphoric meanings and its emerging multi facet identity. The concept of vertical accessibility in the form of tread and riser arrangement makes stairs a timeless phenomenon. The approach to multi utility architectural elements stretches beyond physical functions and should integrate the various dimensions of space making and society. In this regard stairs are a pioneering entity that has a potential to relate to many spheres of human thinking. It is clearly evident that stairs are not bound within the confines of architecture. Their origin, utility and design have far more influential qualities that travel beyond the realms of function and symbolism. It is further discussed that in the present age stairs have become as an inspiration for physical well being. The issues involved with age based capabilities demand a certain design approach that satisfies the sensitive relation between built environments and building elements.
Metrics
References
Alan, and Blanc, S. (2001). Stairs. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Allen, E. (2005). How Buildings Work: The natural order of architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berger, S. E., Theuring, C., Adolph, K. E. (2007). “How and when infants learn to climb stairs”, Infant Behavior & Development, 30: 36–49.
Bollas, C. (2000). “Architecture and the Unconscious”, International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 9(1-2): 28-42.
Campbell, J W P., and Tutton, M. (Ed.). (2014). Staircases: History, Repair and Conservation. England: Routledge.
Mellaart, J. (1962). “Excavations at Catal Huyuk: First Preliminary Report”, Anatolian Studies, 12: 41-65.
Cirlot, J. E. (1971). A Dictionary of Symbols. England: Routledge.
Erickstad, S. (2012). A Subconscious Ascent: Exploring the Architecture of the Metaphoric Staircase. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Victoria, Wellington: University of Wellington.
Ghose, M. (2011). “From Vivekananda to Kallat”, Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies, 36(2): 9-25.
Good, R. (2009). “Double staircases and the vertical distribution of housing in Venice 1450– 1600”, Architectural Research Quarterly, 13 (1): 73-86.
Humphrey, C., and Vitebsky, P. (2003). Sacred Architecture. United Kingdom: Duncan Baird Publishers.
Juneja, M. (Ed.). (2001). Architecture in Medieval India. New Delhi: Permanent Black Publications.
Miles, M. M. (1999). “Interior Staircases in Western Greek Temples”, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, 44: 1-26.
Nicoll, G., Zimring, C. (2009). “Effect of Innovative Building Design on Physical Activity”, Journal of Public Health Policy, 30: 111-123.
Onians, J. (1992). “Architecture, Metaphor and the Mind”, Architectural History, 35: 192-207.
Pallasmaa, J. (2000). “Stairways of the Mind”, International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 9(1-2): 7-18.
Scott, A. (2005). “Falls on Stairways: Literature Review, Report Number: HSL/2005/10”, Health and Safety Laboratory, England.
Sharr, A. (Ed.). (2007). Heidegger for Architects. England: Routledge.
Steadman, S. R. (2000). “Spatial Patterning and Social Complexity on Prehistoric Anatolian Tell Sites: Models for Mounds”, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 19: 164–199.
Tanaka, H. (1992). “Leonardo da Vinci, Architect of Chambord?”, Artibus et Historiae, 13(25): 85-102.
Wilkinson, C. (1975). “The Escorial and the Invention of the Imperial Staircase”, The Art Bulletin, 57(1): 65-90.
Zimring, C., Joseph, A., Nicoll, G. L., Tsepas, S. (2005). “Influences of Building Design and Site Design on Physical Activity”, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28 (2S2): 186-193.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 