Psychogeography in Planning: A New Methodological Approach via Representations of ‘Body’, ‘Urban Space’ and ‘Walking’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.255Keywords:
Body, dérive, psychogeography, representations of space, walkingAbstract
Pattern of urban space penetrates the minds and bodies of citizens; this penetration results in a two-folded map: physical and psychogeographic maps. Mental representations enable (re)-reading the invisible components of physical organization through spatial practice. Re-mapping such an authentic spatial knowledge is a crucial but neglected field of enquiry within planning to grasp the gap between ‘what is conceived’ and ‘what is experienced’. ‘Psychogeography’ concentrates on how the environment influences individuals’ feelings and attitudes and therefore –at the intersection of geography and psychology– it presents an epistemological basis to examine such a gap and offers methodological inputs to cover the interrelation among top-down designs of urban space and bottom-up reproductions of ‘the soul’ of the city. Within this context, the main question of the study is “how the representations of walking experience can be used within planning with reference to the two-folded map assumption”. During this examination, theoretical and methodological readings on psychogeography led us to an epistemological baseline, as an initial step to construct a new spatial methodology of the ‘body’ and ‘walking experience’. The studyk is composed of three sub-sections. Firstly, the gap between ‘physical’ and ‘psychological’ maps is conceptualized. Secondly, the concept of psychogeography is defined as a source and method of spatial knowledge within its deficiencies and potentials. Lastly, the term, Dérive, implying ‘deviation’ and ‘resistance’, is discussed as a methodological path in grasping the gap between physical and psychological maps via the experience of body and conception of the designer.
Metrics
References
Aksümer, G. (2019). Kenti yaşayandan öğrenmek: Şehircilik çalışmalarında rehberli gezi yönteminin kullanımı, İzmir-Selçuk ve Bursa-İznik örnekleri. Megaron, 14 (4), 598-610. https://doi.org/10.14744/MEGARON.2019.48751
Coşkun, H. (2017, December 7). Psikocoğrafya nedir? https://htcoskun.blogspot.com/2017/12/psikocografya-nedir.html
Covery, M. (2011). Psikocoğrafya: Londra Yazıları. Kalkedon Yay.
Çelen Öztürk, A. (2016). Eskişehir’in geçmişteki ve bugünkü kent belleğinin zihin haritaları üzerinden okuma denemeleri. İdeal Kent Dergisi, 20(7), 856-880. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/466335
Debord G. (1955). Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography, (Translated by Ken Knabb), Les Nevres Mues, Situationist International Anthology. Bureu of Public Secrets [2006 (revised and expanded edition)].
Göregenli, M. (2010). Çevre Psikolojisi – İnsan Mekân İlişkileri. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
İlkay, Y. (2016). (Re)Production and appropriation of open public spaces: Representational moments for urban green in ankara. Unpublished PhD thesis, METU, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Urban Policy Planning and Local Governments.
İlkay, Y. (2017). Kentsel yeşil alan’ın ne’liği üzerine: Ankara’da yeşil alanın temsil mekanı olarak (yeniden) üretilmesi. İdeal Kent – Kent Araştırmaları Dergisi. İdeal Kent Araştırmaları Yayınevi, vol. 21, 181–199. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/466435
İlkay, Y. (2018). Liveliness pattern of van city centre (bazaar) from the viewpoint of flâneur/flâneuse: Spatial topology of two main axes with open and green areas. In G. F. Yücel Caymaz & B. Işık (Eds), Cultural Landscape of Van, Turkey (pp. 168–183). Istanbul Aydın University Publications.
İlkay, Y. (2020). ‘Kendileme’ odağında kentte yürümenin mekânsal topolojisi: Van örneğinde alt yürüme bölgeleri. Sketch, Journal of City and Regional Planning, 02(02), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.5505/sjcrp.2021.43153
Jacobs, J. (2011 [1961]). Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı. Metis Yayınları.
Kelly F. (2020). ‘Hurry up please, it’s time!’ A psychogeography of a decommissioned university campus. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 722-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1746263
Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research: An introduction and guide. Polity Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). Production of Space, Blackwell.
Lynch, K. (2010 [1960]). Kent imgesi. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
MacFarle, R. (2005). A road to one’s own (kendine ait bir yol). Literature Booklet of Times,7th October 2005.
Pamuk, O. (2006). İstanbul: Hatıralar ve şehir. İletişim Yayınları.
Paquot, T. (2011 [2005]). Şehirsel bedenler: Beton ile asfalt arası(nda) hassasiyetler. Everest Yayınları/Satırarası.
Önen, S. (2016). Kenti yürüyerek keşfetmenin sosyolojisi. İdeal Kent Dergisi, 18(7), 286-303. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/464560
Öner, O. (2020). Ses yürüyüşleri ve mekânsal algı çalışmalarında kentsel planlamaya: Kadiköy_akustik örneği. Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi, 5(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.26835/my.713884
Sarı, J. (2013). Kenti deneyimleme aracı olarak psikocoğrafya. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Science and Applied Sciences, Department of Architecture.
Seamon, D. (2013). Place attachment and phenomenology, the synergistic dynamism of place. In Manzo & Wright (Eds.), Place Attachment (pp. 11-22). Routledge.
Sennett, R. (2008). Ten ve taş: Batı uygarlığında beden ve şehir. Metis Yayınları.
Şahin Yeşil, S. (2016). Psikocoğrafya ve bir şehir gezgininin anıları. Monograf / Edebiyat Eleştirisi Dergisi, 2016/5, 124–149. http://monografjournal.com /sayilar/5/psikocografya-ve-bir-sehir-gezgininin-anilari.pdf
Stavrides, S. (2018). Müşterek mekân: Müşterekler olarak şehir. Sel Yayınları.
Şengül, H.T. (2000). Siyaset ve mekansal ölçek sorunu: Yerelci stratejilerin bir eleştirisi. In A. Tonak (Ed.), Küreselleşme, İmge Kitabevi.
Tanpınar, A. H. (1960). İstanbul: Beş şehir. İş Bankası Yayınları.
Taşdizen ve Kaygan (2016). Ahlak dışı nesneler: Ulus’ta kentsel dönüşümün bir psikocoğrafyası. Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 89-103. https://jag.journalagent.com/jas/pdfs/JAS_4_2_89_103.pdf
Werner, S. and Schindler, L. E. (2004). The Role of Spatial Reference Frames in Architecture. Environment and Behaviour, v.36, 4, 461-482.
Yorgancıoğlu D. ve Çalak I. (2020). Bedensel deneyime dayalı yer bilgisinin yeniden yapılandırılması için bir yöntem irdelemesi: Deneyimsel harita. Megaron, 15(1), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.14744/MEGARON.2020.80269
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.