Building Production Processes Planning and Management in Classical Greek Era; Comparison with Contemporary Practices
Keywords:Construction management, construction production process, ecclesia, Greek period
Through the example of the Classical Greek Era, the study focuses on seeking an answer to the question of whether managerial techniques and strategies were developed in building production processes in ancient times. The study aims to identify and examine the stages planned in the building production processes and the construction management and organization techniques developed during the Classical Greek period (VI.-IV. century BCE), which played an important role in the development of building art and to compare the practices of the Era with today's construction and management practices. The research methodology is based on the interpretation of historical data from the Classical Greek Era, consisting of construction texts written on stone slabs and their epigraphic explanations, and the comparison of the practices of the Era with contemporary practices. The stone slab samples with the construction texts used in the study were taken from the Sara B. Aleshire Center for Greek Epigraphic Studies catalogs at the University of Berkeley. The epigraphically analyzed descriptions of these inscriptions by different authors were obtained by searching the literature sources through the catalog numbers given to the samples. In the classical Greek Era, three main administrative public bodies made decisions on construction, planning, and managing the construction processes. These include the Senate, Ecclesia (people's assembly), and building commissions. By the decision of the people's assembly, building commissions were established to manage and supervise the construction process from a financial, administrative, and technical perspective. This research has contributed to the understanding that today's building production strategies and management theories have their roots in ancient times, thereby contributing to the universality of construction and management theory. Due to the dynamic nature of the research, the period analyzed was also compared with the current production management theories. The study's uniqueness lies in interpreting historical documents and observing and comparing current conditions. Hence, while the construction and management systems in the Classical Greek period are understood, two different processes are analyzed in their own contexts, and their differences and similarities are highlighted.
Ağaoğulları, M.A. (2013). From the City State to the Empire. İmge Publishing.
Akad, M., Bihterin, V.D., & Bulut, N. (2017). General public law (13th ed.). Der Publishing.
Akbıyıklı, R., & Dikmen, S. Ü. (2019). Construction project management theory and construction industry relationship: A review study. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 7, 136-159. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.430343
Akkoç, A. (2014). The conceptual aspect of Greek democracy, its social background, Journal of Social Sciences, 16 (1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.5578/JSS.7394
Bingöl, O. (2004). Stone in archaeological architecture. Magnesia Excavations; Archeology Culture Art Series 1, Homer Bookstore.
Bohn, R. (1982). Altgriechischer Bauvertrag. Centralblatt der Bauerverwaltung.
Bundgaard, J.A. (1957). A Greek architect at work. phd thesis, at the Department of Sociology University of Copenhagen.
Burford, A. (1969). The Greek Temple Builders at Epidauros. A Social and Economic Study of Building in the Asklepian Sanctuary, during the Fourth and Early Third Centuries BC., University of Toronto Press.
Coulton, J. J. (1977). Ancient Grek Architecst at Work Problems of Structure and Desing. Cornell University Press, Figüre 62, 142.
Dörpfeld, W. (1882). Altgriechischer Bauvertag. Centralblatt der Bauverwaltung.
European Commission. (2012). Europen Aid, Project Cycle Management Handbook.
Gaertringen, Hiller, F. (1906). Inschriften von Priene. Drück und Verlag von Georg Reimer.
Griechische Bauinschriften. (2019, September 28). Das Nike-Dekret IG I.3.35. http://www2.huberlin.de/winckelmann/einf_bauinschr_2.
Günther, W. (1971). Das Orakel von Didyma in hellenistischer zeit.: Ist Mitt Beih, (4). Verlag der Universität Tübingen.
Hobday, M. (1998). Project complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26 (6), 689-710.
Honsell, H. (2010). Greek law. Springer Verlag.
Kahrstedt, U. (1969). Untersuchungen zur Magistratur in Athen. Geisteswissenschaftliche Forschungen Scientia Verlag.
Koldewey, R., O. Puchstein (1899). Die Griechischen Tempel in Unteritalien und Sicilien. A. Asher & Co. Publishing.
Korres, M, (2000). The Stones of the Parthenon Oxford. University Press.
Korres, M., K. Vierneisel (1992). Vom Penteli zum Parthenon: Werdegang eines Kapitells zwischen Steinbruch und Tempel. Glyptothek Verlag.
Koskela, L. (1999). We need a theory of construction. Berkley-Stanford CE & M Workshop: Defining a Research Agenda for AEC Process/Product Development in 2000 and Beyond, Stanford University Press, 26-28.
Lattermann, H. (1908). Griechische Bauinschriften. phd thesis, at the Department of Philosophischen University of Strassburg.
Maier, F., G. (1961). Griechische Mauerbauinschriften. Vestigia Bd. 1 und 2, Quelle & Meyer Publisher.
Nunnally, S.W. (2001). Construction Methods and Management. Prentice Hall College Publisher.
Osthues, W. (2014). Bauwissen im Antiken Griechenland-Rom. Pro Business Digital Printing Deutschland GmbH.
Pfarr, K. (1985). Geschichte der Bauwirtschaft. Deutscher Consulting Verlag.
PMI, (2017). A guide to project management body of knowledge (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA, Project Management Institute Publisher.
PMBOK, (2009). Project management profession principles techniques and route association. PMI TR.
Prignitz, S. (2014). Bauurkunden und Bauprogramm von Epidauros (400-350). C.H.Beck oHG Verlag.
Ricken, H. (1977). Der Architekt Geschichte Eines Berufs. Henschel Verlag.
Sekler, E.F. (1959). Der Architekt im Wandel der Zeiten. Der Aufbau (14), 480-515.
The Sara Aleshire Center for The Study of Greek Epigraphy. (2020, Mai 14). Epidaurus IG IV.2.1.102. http://aleshire.berkeley.edu.
The Sara Aleshire Center for The Study of Greek Epigraphy. (2020, Mai 31). Nike-Dekret IG I.3.35. http://aleshire.berkeley.edu.
The Sara Aleshire Center for The Study of Greek Epigraphy. (2020, Mai 31). Athena Alea Tempel IG II/III(2)1.6. http://aleshire.berkeley.edu.
Thür, G. (1984). Bemerkungen zum altgriechischen Werkvertrag (Die Bauvergabeordnung aus Tegea IG II/III (2).I.1.6). Studi in onore di Arnaldo Biscardi Verlag.
Turner, J. R. (2006). Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the project governance and project management. International Journal of Project Management, (24), 93-95.
Wittenburg, A. (1978). Griechische Baukommissionen des 5. Und 4. Jahrhunderts. Phd Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität zu München.
Yaman, H. (2009). Building production process. MİM 332, Construction Management and Economics Lecture Notes, ITU Faculty of Architecture Department of Architecture, Department of Building Science, Project and Construction Management Unit.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.