Ecological Memory and Socio-Ecological Resilience Approach Within the Scope of Muğla Wildfires
Keywords:Ecological memory, ecosystem, Muğla, resilience, wildfires
The climate change crisis stemming from anthropogenic reasons has triggered severe weather events and disasters all over the world in recent years. In this context, the main purpose of the paper is to reveal the importance of ecological memory in the face of the wildfires threatening our living spaces and taking place between 29 July-12 August 2021 throughout Muğla Province, and to divulge basic strategies for the future of the region by questioning the resilience of ecosystem. The damage caused by wildfires are determined by using satellite images and remote sensing methods in GIS. Accordingly, the borders of burned areas were determined by using mainly remote sensing data according to the degree of burn severity on the basis of NBR. In turn, these borders were overlapped with CLC data and administrative borders at different scales for determination of the land cover types of the burned areas and the urban areas affected. Subsequently, the actual surface areas of the burned regions were calculated by using SRTM GL1 satellite images. The results show that not only forest assets, but also agricultural areas, production areas, mining areas, urban transportation network and residential areas were damaged by the wildfires. Although burned areas can be calculated by using remote sensing methods as done in this study, exact delimitation of fire zones and precise distribution of the burned areas according to land cover types also require in-situ work. Hence, the scope of the paper doesn’t cover these issues that can only be addressed by future studies. Overall, the paper proposes a framework for questioning the socio-ecological resilience of the ecosystem in the upcoming period of the disasters that threaten our living spaces, and formulates a set of strategies for spatial planning by employing a socio-ecological approach for increasing the resilience of habitats by revealing ecological memory.
Clavet, C., Topik, C., Harrell, M., Holmes, P., Healy, R., & Wear, D. (2021). Wildfire resilience funding: Building blocks for a Paradigm shift, The Nature Conservancy.
CORINE Land Cover (CLC), (2018). Arazi Örtüsü Verisi.
Congedo, L. (2021). Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin: A Python tool for the download and processing of remote sensing images in QGIS, Journal of Open Source Software, 6(64), 3172. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03172
Cumhuriyet Gazetesi (2021). Muğla'da 66 bin hektar orman yandı, https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/muglada-66-bin-hektar-orman-yandi-1859130
Eisenberg, C., Anderson, C.L., Collingwood, A., Sissons, R., Dunn, C.J., Meigs, G.W., Hibbs, D.E., Murphy, S., Kuiper, S.D., Spear Chief-Morris, J., Bear, L.L., Johnston, B., & Edson, C.B. (2019). Out of the ashes: ecological resilience to extreme wildfire, prescribed burns, and indigenous burning in ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 436.
Gonzalez-Mathiesen, C., Ruane, S., & March, A. (2020). Integrating wildfire risk management and spatial planning – A historical review of two Australian planning systems, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 53, 101984.
HGK (2021). Türkiye Mülki İdare Sınırları, Dağıtım Formatı: ESRI shp. https://www.harita.gov.tr/urun/turkiye-mulki-idare-sinirlari/232.
Johnstone, J. F., Allen, C. D., Franklin, J. F., Frelich, L. E., Harvey, B. J., Higuera, P. E., Mack, M. C., Meentemeyer, R. K., Metz, M. R., Perry, G. LW., Schoennagel, T., & Turner, M. G. (2016). Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(7), 369–378.
Kavlak, M.Ö., Çabuk, S.N., & Çetin, M. (2021). Development of forest fire risk map using geographical information systems and remote sensing capabilities: Ören case, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 33265–33291.
Kavlak, M.Ö., Kurtipek, A., & Çabuk, S.N. (2020). Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri İle Orman Yangını Risk Haritası Oluşturulması: Ören Örneği, Dirençlilik Dergisi, 4(1), 33-54.
Keeley, J. E. (2009). Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage, International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18(1), 116-126.
Key, C. H., Benson, N., Ohlen, D., Howard, S. M., & Zhu, Z. (2002). The normalized burn ratio and relationships to burn severity: ecology, remote sensing and implementation [Paper presentation], Ninth Biennial Remote Sensing Applications Conference, Apr 8–12, San Diego, CA.
Key, C. H., & Benson, N. C. (2006). Landscape assessment (LA). In: Lutes, D. C., Keane, R. E., Caratti, J. F., Key, C. H., Benson, N. C., Sutherland, S., & Gangi, L. J. (Eds.), FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-164-CD, Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p. 1-55, 164.
Llorens, R., Sobrino, J. A., Fernández, C., Fernández-Alonso, J. M., & Vega, J. A. (2021). A methodology to estimate forest fires burned areas and burn severity degrees using Sentinel-2 data. Application to the October 2017 fires in the Iberian Peninsula, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 95, 102243.
Lutes, D. C., Keane, R. E., Caratti, J. F., Key, C. H., Benson, N. C., Sutherland, S., & Gangi, L. J. (2006). FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System. General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-164-CD, Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr164.pdf
Mashhadi, N., & Algancı, U. (2021). Determination of forest burn scar and burn severity from free satellite images: a comparative evaluation of spectral indices and machine learning classifiers. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 8(4), 488-497.
McWethy, D.B., Schoennagel, T., Higuera, P.E., Krawchuk, M., Harvey, B. J., Metcalf, E. C., Schultz, C., Miller, C., Metcalf, A. L., Buma, B., Virapongse, A., Kulig, J. C., Stedman, R. C., Ratajczak, Z., Nelson, C. R., & Kolden, C. (2019). Rethinking resilience to wildfire, Nature Sustainability, 2 (2019): 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0353-8
NASA SRTM (2013). Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) GL 1.
Nasery, S., & Kalkan K. (2020). Burn Area Detection and Burn Severity Assessment Using Sentinel 2 MSI Data: The Case of Karabağlar District, İzmir/Turkey, Turkish Journal of Geosciences, 1(2), 72-77.
OGM (2021). Yüzdelik Olarak İllere Göre Orman Varlığı. https://web.ogm.gov.tr/Documents/Orman_Varligi_Dosyalari/Yuzdelik-Illere-Gore-Orman-Varligi.pdf.
OGM (2022). Yangın Yönetim Planları/Muğla OBM. https://web.ogm.gov. tr/ekutuphane/Dokumanlar/Yangın Yönetim Planları/Muğla OBM.
Pepe, M., & Parente, C. (2018). Burned area recognition by change detection analysis using images derived from Sentinel-2 satellite: The case study of Sorrento Peninsula, Italy. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 16(2), 225-232.
Peterson, G.D. (2002). Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems, 5(4), 329-338.
Polat, N., Kaya, Y. (2021). Çok Bantlı Uydu Görüntüleriyle Orman Yangınlarında Hasar Tespiti, Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 172-181.
QGIS (2021). Quantum GIS. https://qgis.org/
Roy, D. P., Huang, H., Boschetti, L., Giglio, L., Yan, L., Zhang, H. H., & Li, Z. (2019). Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 burned area mapping-A combined sensor multi-temporal change detection approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 231, 111254.
SAGA (2021). System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses. http://www.saga-gis.org/en/index.html
Saulino, L., Rita, A., Migliozzi, A., Maffei, C., Allevato, E., Garonna, A. P., & Saracino, A. (2020). Detecting burn severity across mediterranean forest types by coupling medium-spatial resolution satellite imagery and field data, Remote Sensing, 12(4), 741.
Selles, O. A., Rissman, A. R. (2020). Content analysis of resilience in forestfire science and management, Land Use Policy, 94, 104483, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104483
Sobrino, J. A., Llorens, R., Fernández, C., Fernández-Alonso, J. M., & Vega, J. A. (2019). Relationship between forest fires severity measured in situ and through remotely sensed spectral indices, Forests, 10(5), 457.
Sözcü Gazetesi (2021) Muğla’da orman yangınlarının bilançosu ortaya çıktı. https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2021/gundem/muglada-orman-yanginlarinin-bilancosu-ortaya-cikti-6584017/
Strand, E.K., Satterberg, K.L., Hudak, A.T., Byrne, J., Khalyani, A.H., & Smith, A. (2019). Does burn severity affect plant community diversity and composition in mixed conifer forests of the United States Intermountain West one decade post fire? Fire Ecology, 15(1), 1-22.
Sümer, Ö., Akin, A., & Tekin, A. (2020). Antropojen ve Antroposen kavramlarının tarihsel gelişimine yerbilimsel bir bakış, Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 63(1), 1-20.
Thompson, M.P., Bowden, P., Brough, A., Scott, J.H., Gilbertson-Day, J., Taylor, A., Anderson, J., & Haas, J.R. (2016). Application of Wildfire Risk Assessment Results to Wildfire Response Planning in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA, Forests, 7, 64. doi:10.3390/f7030064
Türkeş, M., & Altan, G. (2013). İklimsel değişimlerin ve orman yanginlarinin Muğla Yöresi’ndeki doğal çevre, doğa koruma alanlari ve biyotaya etkilerinin bir ekolojik biyocoğrafya çözümlemesi, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 22/2, 57-76, İzmir.
Walker, R.B, Coop, J.D, Downing, W.M, Krawchuk, M.A, Malone, S.L, & Meigs, G.W. (2019). How much forest persists through fire? High-resolution mapping of tree cover to characterize the abundance and spatial pattern of fire refugia across mosaics of burn severity. Forests, 10(9), 782.
Weirather, M., Zeug, G., & Schneider, T. (2018). Automated Delineation of Wildfire Areas Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery. GI_Forum 2018, 6, 251-262.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.