A Spatial Configuration Oriented Control System as a Mobile App for Educational Facilities Design in Turkey

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.246%20

Keywords:

Educational facilities, feedback, interior design, spatial configuration

Abstract

Facilities has decreased due to the developing technologies around the world. The main objective of this study is to offer an alternative solution in terms of architecture to the use of copy-type projects which are still used by the Ministry of Education in Turkey. In this direction, it is aimed to develop a software to make the spatial configuration of an educational structure in the design process controllable. In this study it is planned to design a feedback mechanism that architects can use in the educational structure design process. The data obtained as a result of expert interviews, examination of guidelines by the ministry and examination of existing types of projects with the space syntax technique were transformed into software language. As a result of analysis done, evaluations were presented in line with the obtained data and findings. Out of these a pre-notification mechanism was designed to be used in the design process of educational buildings.  The feedback system, which is defined as educational buildings in the current article, can be applied in different areas such as clinics, hospitals, shopping centres and university buildings in the next stages. By using the mobile application that is emerged as a result of the research, the designers will be able to identify problematic spatial relationships by providing data to the application at different stages in the process of designing an educational structure. Thus, it will be able to intervene in a timely manner based on the problems it detects.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Aslan Nayeb, Yeditepe University

Aslan Nayeb is an architect. He worked as a teaching assistant from 2016 to 2021 at the Department of Interior Architecture at Avrasya University, Trabzon, Turkey. Now, he works as an assistant professor at Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey. He completed his undergraduate education at Azad University in Iran and his master’s degree and Ph.D. education at Karadeniz Technichal University (2014-2021). He specializes in the field of spatial configuration, educational facilities design and architectural representation.

Cengiz Tavşan, Karadeniz Technical University

Cengiz TAVŞAN is an architect. He worked as researcher 1990 at the Department of Architecture at Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Now, he works as an Assoc. Prof. Dr. at Karadeniz Technical   University. He completed his undergraduate education at Karadeniz Technical   University and his master’s degree and Ph.D. education at Karadeniz Technical University (1993-2000). He specializes in the field of architecture and form, history of modern architecture an historical buildings

References

Abend, A., et al. (2006), "Evaluating Quality in Educational Facilities", PEB Exchange, Programme on Educational Building, No. 2006/01, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/530661814151.

Arcan, E. F., & Evci, F. (1999). Mimari tasarıma yaklaşım: bina bilgisi çalışmaları. Tasarım Yayın Grubu.

Ayres, P. And Sweller, J. (2005). The Split-Attention Principle In Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook Of Multimedia Learning (Pp. 135–146). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Balci, A. (2007). Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim Sistemleri. Pegem Publications, Ankara.

Büyükgöze, S. (2019). Mobil Uygulama Marketlerinin Güvenlik Modeli Incelemeleri. Türkiye Bilişim Vakfı Bilgisayar Bilimleri Ve Mühendisliği Dergisi, 12(1), 9-18.

Çakır, S., & Tuna Taygun, G. (2021). The Re-Evaluation of Existing School Buildings in Turkey within the Context of ‘Green School’. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning.

Chism, N. V. N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. Learning spaces, 2-1.).

da Graça, V. A. C., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & Petreche, J. R. D. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil. Building and Environment, 42(2), 984-999.

De Callafon, R. A. (1998). Feedback Oriented Identification For Enhanced And Robust Control. In Dr. Dissertation, Mechan. Engin. Systems And Control Group, Delft Univ. Technology.

Erman, O. (2017). Mekânsal Komşuluk Kavramı Üzerinden Mimari Mekânın Analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 165-176.

Eurydice (2015). Avrupa'da Öğretmenlik Mesleği: Uygulamalar, Algılar Ve Politikalar. Avrupa Komisyonu Eurydice Raporu, Lüksemburg: A European Union Publishing Office,

Gür, Ş. Ö., & Zorlu, T. (2002). Çocuk Mekânları. Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Publications, Istanbul.

Hille, T. (2011). Modern schools: a century of design for education. John Wiley & Sons.

Hillier, B. (2007). Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory Of Architecture. Space Syntax.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The Social Logic Of Space. Cambridge University Press.).

Johnson, S. M. (2006). The Workplace Matters: Teacher Quality, Retention, And Effectiveness. Working Paper. National Education Association Research Department.

Keskin, N. Ö., & Kilinç, A. G. H. (2015). Mobil Öğrenme Uygulamalarına Yönelik Geliştirme Platformlarının Karşılaştırılması Ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları Ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 68-90.

Kurtuluş, K., & Kaymaz, K. (2007). Davraniş Boyutuyla Performans Geribildirim Olgusu Ve Süreci. Ankara Üniversitesi Sbf Dergisi, 62(04), 141-178.

Leung, M. Y., & Fung, I. (2005). Enhancement of classroom facilities of primary schools and its impact on learning behaviors of students. Facilities.

Liao, P., Gu, N., Yu, R., & Brisbin, C. (2021). Exploring The Spatial Pattern Of Historic Chinese Towns And Cities: A Syntactical Approach. Frontiers Of Architectural Research.

Lyons, J. B. (2001). Do School Facilities Really Impact A Child's Education? Issuetrak: A CEFPI Brief On Educational Facility Issues

MEB Guideline (2015). Eğitim Yapıları Asgari Tasarım Standartları Kılavuzu. TC Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı İnşaat Ve Emlak Dairesi Başkanlığı.

Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2008). TÜRKİYE VE AVUSTURYA EĞİTİM SİSTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 545-559.

Scott-Webber, L. (2004). In sync: Environmental behavior research and the design of learning spaces. Society for College and University Planning.

Şenyi̇ği̇t, V., & Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2020). End-user preferences in school design: A qualitative study based on student perspective. Building and Environment, 185, 107294.

Tavşan, F., & YANILMAZ, Z. (2019). Eğitim Yapılarında Sürdürülebilir Yaklaşımlar. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, (24), 359-383.

Uduku, O. (2015). Designing schools for quality: An international, case study-based review. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 56-64.

Wilks, S. (2010). A charter for children’s learning at the Royal Children’s Hospital. Melbourne, Australia. he University of Melbourne and the RCH Education Institute.

Woolner, P. (2010). The design of learning spaces. A&C Black.

Yilmaz, S., & Daly, S. R. (2016). Feedback In Concept Development: Comparing Design Disciplines. Design Studies, 45, 137-158.

Downloads

Published

27-06-2023

How to Cite

Nayeb, A., & Tavşan, C. (2023). A Spatial Configuration Oriented Control System as a Mobile App for Educational Facilities Design in Turkey. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 11(1), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.246

Issue

Section

Articles