A Spatial Configuration Oriented Control System as a Mobile App for Educational Facilities Design in Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.246%20Keywords:
Educational facilities, feedback, interior design, spatial configurationAbstract
Facilities has decreased due to the developing technologies around the world. The main objective of this study is to offer an alternative solution in terms of architecture to the use of copy-type projects which are still used by the Ministry of Education in Turkey. In this direction, it is aimed to develop a software to make the spatial configuration of an educational structure in the design process controllable. In this study it is planned to design a feedback mechanism that architects can use in the educational structure design process. The data obtained as a result of expert interviews, examination of guidelines by the ministry and examination of existing types of projects with the space syntax technique were transformed into software language. As a result of analysis done, evaluations were presented in line with the obtained data and findings. Out of these a pre-notification mechanism was designed to be used in the design process of educational buildings. The feedback system, which is defined as educational buildings in the current article, can be applied in different areas such as clinics, hospitals, shopping centres and university buildings in the next stages. By using the mobile application that is emerged as a result of the research, the designers will be able to identify problematic spatial relationships by providing data to the application at different stages in the process of designing an educational structure. Thus, it will be able to intervene in a timely manner based on the problems it detects.
Metrics
References
Abend, A., et al. (2006), "Evaluating Quality in Educational Facilities", PEB Exchange, Programme on Educational Building, No. 2006/01, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/530661814151.
Arcan, E. F., & Evci, F. (1999). Mimari tasarıma yaklaşım: bina bilgisi çalışmaları. Tasarım Yayın Grubu.
Ayres, P. And Sweller, J. (2005). The Split-Attention Principle In Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook Of Multimedia Learning (Pp. 135–146). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Balci, A. (2007). Karşılaştırmalı Eğitim Sistemleri. Pegem Publications, Ankara.
Büyükgöze, S. (2019). Mobil Uygulama Marketlerinin Güvenlik Modeli Incelemeleri. Türkiye Bilişim Vakfı Bilgisayar Bilimleri Ve Mühendisliği Dergisi, 12(1), 9-18.
Çakır, S., & Tuna Taygun, G. (2021). The Re-Evaluation of Existing School Buildings in Turkey within the Context of ‘Green School’. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning.
Chism, N. V. N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. Learning spaces, 2-1.).
da Graça, V. A. C., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & Petreche, J. R. D. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil. Building and Environment, 42(2), 984-999.
De Callafon, R. A. (1998). Feedback Oriented Identification For Enhanced And Robust Control. In Dr. Dissertation, Mechan. Engin. Systems And Control Group, Delft Univ. Technology.
Erman, O. (2017). Mekânsal Komşuluk Kavramı Üzerinden Mimari Mekânın Analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 165-176.
Eurydice (2015). Avrupa'da Öğretmenlik Mesleği: Uygulamalar, Algılar Ve Politikalar. Avrupa Komisyonu Eurydice Raporu, Lüksemburg: A European Union Publishing Office,
Gür, Ş. Ö., & Zorlu, T. (2002). Çocuk Mekânları. Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Publications, Istanbul.
Hille, T. (2011). Modern schools: a century of design for education. John Wiley & Sons.
Hillier, B. (2007). Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory Of Architecture. Space Syntax.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The Social Logic Of Space. Cambridge University Press.).
Johnson, S. M. (2006). The Workplace Matters: Teacher Quality, Retention, And Effectiveness. Working Paper. National Education Association Research Department.
Keskin, N. Ö., & Kilinç, A. G. H. (2015). Mobil Öğrenme Uygulamalarına Yönelik Geliştirme Platformlarının Karşılaştırılması Ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları Ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 68-90.
Kurtuluş, K., & Kaymaz, K. (2007). Davraniş Boyutuyla Performans Geribildirim Olgusu Ve Süreci. Ankara Üniversitesi Sbf Dergisi, 62(04), 141-178.
Leung, M. Y., & Fung, I. (2005). Enhancement of classroom facilities of primary schools and its impact on learning behaviors of students. Facilities.
Liao, P., Gu, N., Yu, R., & Brisbin, C. (2021). Exploring The Spatial Pattern Of Historic Chinese Towns And Cities: A Syntactical Approach. Frontiers Of Architectural Research.
Lyons, J. B. (2001). Do School Facilities Really Impact A Child's Education? Issuetrak: A CEFPI Brief On Educational Facility Issues
MEB Guideline (2015). Eğitim Yapıları Asgari Tasarım Standartları Kılavuzu. TC Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı İnşaat Ve Emlak Dairesi Başkanlığı.
Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2008). TÜRKİYE VE AVUSTURYA EĞİTİM SİSTEMLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(3), 545-559.
Scott-Webber, L. (2004). In sync: Environmental behavior research and the design of learning spaces. Society for College and University Planning.
Şenyi̇ği̇t, V., & Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2020). End-user preferences in school design: A qualitative study based on student perspective. Building and Environment, 185, 107294.
Tavşan, F., & YANILMAZ, Z. (2019). Eğitim Yapılarında Sürdürülebilir Yaklaşımlar. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, (24), 359-383.
Uduku, O. (2015). Designing schools for quality: An international, case study-based review. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 56-64.
Wilks, S. (2010). A charter for children’s learning at the Royal Children’s Hospital. Melbourne, Australia. he University of Melbourne and the RCH Education Institute.
Woolner, P. (2010). The design of learning spaces. A&C Black.
Yilmaz, S., & Daly, S. R. (2016). Feedback In Concept Development: Comparing Design Disciplines. Design Studies, 45, 137-158.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.