Turkey Experience in Urban Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2021.188Keywords:
Sustainability, urban governance, urban negotiation, urban policy, urban transformationAbstract
Purpose
This study focuses on the current situation and problems of urban transformation practices in Turkey, with respect to space, society, and policy. A number of field studies and surveys were conducted in the study area in Konya city in Turkey, with regards to the unity of space, society, and politics and were developed spatial strategies that ensure such unity.
Design/Methodology/Approach
The study consisted of two stages. In the first stage, the literature on the need for urban transformation in Turkey was reviewed based on experiences relating to space (land fragmentation, property rights, informalities housing), society (the coordination and participation processes), and politics (current legislation, actors and their roles, horizontal and vertical coordination, public interest, planning strategy, policy learning). In the second stage, a number of field studies (the status of the buildings, the building types, the land use status, the status of historical and cultural structures, the land to building ratio, the land fragmentation and cadastral status and surveys) were utilized within the scope of our analysis. The survey questions consisted of the problems and expectations of inhabitants and NGOs with respect to spatial, political and social aspects of the study area.
Findings
Based on the results of the current situation analysis and field survey, spatial strategies that provide the unity of space, society, and politics were developed for the study area.
Research Limitations/Implications
With respect to actors and their roles, this study focuses on two groups as representatives of the social structure. The other groups also should be involved directly or indirectly because of the multi-factor structure of the urban transformation processes.
Social/Practical Implications
Identifying the need, processes and problems related to urban transformation, based on the unity of space, society, and politics could have positive effects on sustainable projects.
Originality/Value
This study is important with the development of spatial strategies with the participation and cooperation activities of the residents and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the basis of neighbourhoods in urban transformation.
Metrics
References
Afacan, Y. (2015). Resident satisfaction for sustainable urban regeneration. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer, 168(4), 220–234.
Akın, O. & Özdemir, D. (2010). A comparative assessment of the European Union and Turkey in the Housing production process and TOKI applications, In Dilek Özdemir, eds. Policy, Legislation and Implementation in Urban Transformation: European Experience, Istanbul Applications, Nobel Broadcast Distribution, pp. 285-316, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
Altunışık, R. Coşku, R. Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2010). Research methods in social sciences, SPSS applied, Sakarya Publishing. (in Turkish).
Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
Ay, D. (2019). Diverging community responses to state-led urban renewal in the context of recentralization of planning authority : An analysis of three urban renewal projects in Turkey. Habitat International, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102028
Batuman, B. (2013). City profile: Ankara, Cities, 31, 578-590.
Bektaş, Y. (2014). Bir Kentleşme Stratejisi Olarak Yasanın Kentsel Mekanı Dönüştürmedeki Etkisi : Ankara Örneği. Planning, 24(3), 157–172.
Bostan, M. Erdoğanaras, F. & Tamer, N.G. (2010). Manufacturing industry replacement process and features in the metropolitan area in Ankara, METU JFA, 27(1), 81-102.
Bozdağ, A. (2015). Analysis of urban regeneration applications in consensus land use planning approach, Thesis (Phd), The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science S.U. Konya (in Turkish).
Cahantimur, A. I., Öztürk, R. B., & Öztürk, A. C. (2010). Securing land for urban transformation through sustainable brownfield regeneration – the case of Eskişehir, Turkey. Environment and Urbanization (IIED), 22(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247809362641
Dündar, Ö. (2001). Models of Urban Transformation Informal Housing in Ankara, Cities, 18 (6), 391–401.
Edgar, B. & Taylor, J. (2008). Housing, Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Chapter 8. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association.
Eğercioğlu, Y., Yakıcı, N., & Ertan, T. (2016). Urban Decline and Revitalization Project in Izmir-Tire Historical City Center. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 330–337.
Ercan, M.A. (2011). Challenges and conflicts in achieving sustainable communities in historic neighbourhoods of Istanbul, Habitat International, 35, 295-306.
Eyüboğlu, E., Kubat, A.S. & Ertekin, Ö. (2007). A New Urban Planning Approach for the Regeneration of an Historical Area within Istanbul's Central Business District, Journal of Urban Design, 12(2), 295-312.
Fabris, L. M. F., Camerin, F., Semprebon, G., & Balzarotti, R. M. (2020). New Healthy Settlements Responding to Pandemic Outbreaks : Approaches from ( and for ) the Global City. The Plan Journal, 5(2), 385–406.
Gainza, X. (2017). Culture-led neighbourhood transformations beyond the revitalisation / gentrification dichotomy. Urban Studies, 54(4), 953–970.
Göksu, E. & Bal, E. (2010). Urban transformation projects in Turkey as a neoliberal spatial development strategy. In Dilek Özdemir, eds. Policy, Legislation and Implementation in Urban Transformation: European Experience, Istanbul Applications, Nobel Broadcast Distribution, pp.256-284, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
Günay, Z, & Dökmeci, V. (2012). Culture-led regeneration of Istanbul waterfront: Golden Horn Cultural Valley Project, Cities, 29, 213-222.
Güzey, Ö. (2009). Urban regeneration and increased competitive power : Ankara in an era of globalization. Cities, 26(1), 27–37.
Güzey, Ö. (2016). The last round in restructuring the city : Urban regeneration becomes a state policy of disaster prevention in Turkey. Cities, 50, 40–53.
Hart, T. & Johnston, I. (2006). Employment, Education and Training, Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Chapter 7. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association.
Iban, M. C. (2020). Lessons from approaches to informal housing and non-compliant development in Turkey : An in-depth policy analysis with a historical framework. Land Use Policy, 99.
Işık, O. (1995). The unwritten history of constructivism: Observations on the condition of presence and development in small-scale production in the housing sector in Turkey, Architecture Journal, 261, 43-45. (in Turkish).
Jacobs, B. & Dutton, C. (2004). Social and Commuity Issues, Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Chapter 6. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association.
Jeffrey, P. & Pounder, J. (2002). Physical and Environmental Aspects, Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Chapter 5. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association.
Kayasü, S., & Yetişkul, E. (2014). Evolvıng legal and institutional frameworks of neoliberal urban policies in Turkey, METU JFA, 31 (2), 209-222.
Kreukels, A. M. & Spit, T. J. M. (1990). Public-private partnership in the Netherlands, Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 81 (5), 388-392.
Kocabaş, A. (2006). Urban conservation in Istanbul: evaluation and re-conceptualisation, Habitat International, 30, 107-126.
Lees, L. (2018). Handbook of Gentrification Studies. Edt. Loretta Lees, Martin Phillips. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham and Northampton.
Levy, D. K., Comey, J., & Padilla, S. (2006). In the face of Gentrification Case Studies of local efforts to mitigate displacement. J. Affordable Hous. & Cmty. Dev. L., 238.
Li, J. (2020). Culture and tourism-led peri-urban transformation in China – The case of Shanghai. Cities, 99.
Linchfield, D. (1992). Urban Regeneration for the 1990s, London Planning Advisory Committee, London
Muñoz-gielen, D. (2012). Urban governance , property rights , land readjustment and public value capturing. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 1–19.
Noon, D. Smith-Canham, J. & Eagland, M. (2000). Economic Regeneration and Funding. Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Chapter 4. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association.
Oakley, S. (2011). Re-imagining City Waterfronts : A Comparative Analysis of Governing Renewal in Adelaide , Darwin and Melbourne Re-imagining City Waterfronts : A Comparative Analysis of Governing Renewal in Adelaide , Darwin and Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research, 29(3), 221–238.
Oatley, N. (2000). New Labour ’ s Approach to Age-old Problems Renewing and revitalising poor neighbourhoods ± the national strategy for neighbourhood renewal. Local Economy, 15(2), 86–97.
Öngel, F. S. (2013). Marketed cities and labor. In: A. Koca, C. O. Calıskan, E. Kaya and G. Akgun, eds. Defending Cities, Space, Society and Politics. Nota Bene Publishing, pp:17-20, Ankara, Turkey, (in Turkish).
Özdemir, D. (2010). The changing meanings of urban transformation in Western Europe Turkey reflections. In Dilek Özdemir, eds. Policy, Legislation and Implementation in Urban Transformation: European Experience, Istanbul Applications, Nobel Broadcast Distribution, pp.1-34, Ankara, Turkey, (in Turkish).
Özden, P. (2010). A critical look at the policies and practices of urban transformation in Turkey. In Dilek Özdemir, eds. Policy, Legislation and Implementation in Urban Transformation: European Experience, Istanbul Applications, Nobel Broadcast Distribution, pp. 194-225, Ankara, Turkey, (in Turkish).
Özgür, E. F. (2013). Urban design projects and the planning process : The Kadıköy Old Market Area Revitalization Project and the Kartal Industrial Area Regeneration Project. Cities, 31, 208–219.
Öztürk, P.K. (2006). Urban Transformation of Ottoman Port Cities In The Nineteenth Century: Change From Ottoman Beirut To French Mandatory Beirut. The Graduate School of Social Sciences, METU, 164.
Palancıoğlu, H. M., & Cete, M. (2014). Land Use Policy The Turkish way of housing supply and finance for low- and middle-income people. Land Use Policy, 39, 127–134.
Roberts, P. (2004). The evaluation, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, Editorial Arrangement, Chapters 1 and 14. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association.
Roberts, P. & Skyes H. (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. Editorial Arrangement, Chapters 1 and 14. Edt. Peter Roberts, Hugh Sykes. British Urban Regeneration Association.
Roman´czyk, K. M. (2015). Towards urban governance : Twenty years of neighbourhood contracts in the Brussels-Capital Region. Cities, 44, 1–8.
Rosa, D. La, Privitera, R., Barbarossa, L., & Greca, P. La. (2017). Landscape and Urban Planning Assessing spatial benefits of urban regeneration programs in a highly vulnerable urban context : A case study in Catania , Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 180–192.
Sklair, L. (2017). The icon project: architecture, cities and capitalist globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stöhr, W. (1989). Regional policy at the crossroads: an overview, in L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert, P. Roberts and E. Swyngedlouw (eds.) Regional Policy at the Crossroads: European Perspectives, Jessica Kingsley, London.
Stein, S. (2019). Capital City. Gentrification and the real estate state. London-New York: Verso.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance Innovation and the Citizen : The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.
Tallon, A., (2010). Urban renaissance in England: urban reflections and critical evaluations. In Dilek Özdemir, eds. Policy, Legislation and Implementation in Urban Transformation: European Experience, Istanbul Applications, Nobel Broadcast Distribution, pp.79-98, Ankara, Turkey, (in Turkish).
Tekeli, İ. (2009). It is quoted from the speech made at the Symposium on the Last Ten Years of Planning and Architecture. Yıldız Technical University, Architecture Faculty. (in Turkish).
Topçu, H. (2017). Waterfronts Revisited, European ports in a historic and global perspective. Edt. Heleni Porfyriou, Marichela Sepe. London-New York: Routledge.
Turk, S. S., Tarakci, S., & Gürsoy, N. (2020). A large-scale urban renewal project in a vicious cycle of commons and anticommons : The Fikirtepe case (Istanbul , Turkey). Habitat International, 102.
Uysal, Ü. E. (2012). An urban social movement challenging urban regeneration : The case of Sulukule , Istanbul. Cities, 29, 12–22.
Uzun, B. & Şimşek, N. Ç. (2015). Upgrading of illegal settlements in Turkey; the case of North Ankara Entrance Urban Regeneration Project, Habitat International, 49, 157-164.
Üstün, G. (2009). Legal Aspects of Urban Transformation. XII Publishing. ISBN 978-605-5865-37-5. (in Turkish).
Yılmaz, A. (2007). Notes on the Transformation of Turkish Public Administration in the EU Harmonization Process. University of Dumlupınar, The Journal Social Sciences, 17, 215-214. (in Turkish).
Williamson, W., & Ruming, K. (2019). Urban Renewal and Public Participation in Sydney : Unpacking Social Media Strategies and Use for Contesting Consensus Urban Renewal and Public Participation in Sydney : Unpacking Social Media Strategies and Use for Contesting Consensus. Urban Policy and Research, 1–17.
Zhang, S. (2014). Land-centered urban politics in transitional China – Can they be explained by Growth Machine Theory ? Cities, 41, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.02.010
Zhu, L. & Huang, Y. (2015). Planning for sustainable inner city regeneration in China. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer, 168(4), 244-252.
Visuals' sources based of internet
Konya general overwiev (2016). Figure was created by combining the specified resources by the author.
https://www.tursab.org.tr/pic_lib/bigSize/resimgalerisi/113/konya_113_1244153.jpg [09.02.2016]
http://ruzgarorganizasyon.com/semazen-gosterisi/ [09.02.2016]
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konya#/media/File:Latrans-Turkey_location_Konya.svg 15946885 [02.05.2016]
http://www.skylife.com/tr/2013-02/herkesin-ait-oldugu-yer-catalhoyuk (29.04.2016)
https://artasmedia.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/north-west-bull-painting.jpg [29.09.2016]
https://www.tursab.org.tr/pic_lib/bigSize/resimgalerisi/113/konya_meke_golu-1_113_1243151.jpg [09.02.2016]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 
