DARWINIAN APPROACH AND MUTATIONS: BJARKE INGELS (BIG) AND ANALYSIS OF HIS STEPPED PIXELS BUILDINGS
Keywords:Bjarke Ingels (BIG), evolution, mutation, residential buildings, stepped pixels
Ingels, who was influenced by Darwin, designs new mutants by developing prototypes. This study, it is aimed to scrutinize the public space alternatives proposed for the 21st-century city through the comparative analysis of the stepped pixelated buildings, one of the mutants of the architect. It has been how much questioned the stages, which offer a public space proposal, in the stepped pixelated buildings allow urban dialogue.
While Ingels' design philosophy constitutes the conceptual approach of the study, this study is prepared by using the architect's discourse, interviews, videos, digital texts, and literature studies. In this context, the repetitive examples that the architect defines as mutation and adaptation are classified. The stepped pixels in this classification are the main subject of this study. Ingels' pixelated buildings; Suitable human scale, the language of mass and form, relationship between human and space, the suggestion of space for experience, public space concept, dialogue spaces were discussed based on architect's approach.
Ingels went in the way of dividing the object through pixels when designing macro-scale structures. Thus, he made the big picture more understandable and perceptible. He tried to achieve the human scale with the gradual pixels rising from the ground level. In this way, Ingels' pixels buildings have transformed themselves into an experiential part of urban.
These parameters were evaluated under four dwelling buildings of the stepped pixel in the case study (Lego Tower, Mountain Dwellings, King Street West, 79 & Park).
At this research, it is foreseen that the new living space suggestions consisting of stepped pixels designed by Ingels will undergo different mutations and come up with new urban alternatives in the future.
Pixelated dwellings, one of the mutations of Ingels, who constantly draws attention to the problem of not integrating the buildings into the city in today's architecture, have been analysed and evaluated in the context of urban alliterations. In this way, research, a first in its field is important in terms of opening to discuss the alternative urban living spaces proposed by the architect for 21st-century architecture in the contemporary architectural environment.
Alpay, Z. (2006, November 23). Mimarca Bir Meydan Okuma; Bjarke Ingels ile Söyleşi. [A Challenge by Architect; Interview with Bjarke Ingels]. https://v3.arkitera.com/soylesi_55_bjarke-ingels.html
Balik, D. (2014). Deciphering Ornament, Dissecting “Big”: The Return of Ornament in Contemporary Architectural Theory and Practice. Doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.
Balik, D., & Allmer, A. (2015). This is not a mountain!: Simulation, imitation, and representation in the Mountain Dwellings project, Copenhagen. Architectural Research Quarterly, 19(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135515000196
Biunno, J. (2011). Architects! Out of Ideas? In Clog: Bjarke Ingels Group (pp. 1–37). CLOG.
Boudon, P. (2015). Mimari Mekan Üzerine, Mimarlık Epistemolojisi Üzerine Deneme (Sur l’espace architectural). Janus.
Davidson, J. (2017, June). Designing Tomorrow. Smithsonian, 56–65. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/bjarke-ingels-makes-impossible-concrete-180963301/
Di, Y. (2019). Architects and Global Marketing – Buying and Selling in China. 2019 XJTLU International Conference: Architecture across Boundaries, KnE Social Sciences, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i27.5515
Foster, H. (2011). The Art-Architecture Complex. Verso.
Futuyma, D. J. (2005). Evolution. Sinauer Associates.
Hays, M. K. (2015). Mimarlığın Arzusu Geç Avangardı Okumak (Architecture’s Desire: Reading the Late Avant-Garde). YEM.
Ho, H. H. (2011). [Trans]planted / [Re]placed. In Clog: Bjarke Ingels Group (pp. 54–55). CLOG.
Ingels, B. (2011, October 7). CLOG: BIG Launch Interrogation of Bjarke Ingels. CLOG. http://www.clog-online.com/news/clog-big-storefront-transcript/
Ingels, B. (2010). Yes is More: An Archicomic on Architectural Evolution. Taschen.
Ingels, B. (2009, November 20). TEDxTalks. TEDxAmsterdam. [Video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fIeg8Q2ZLU
Ingels, B. (2012). Public Participation Extreme. Perspecta, 45, 127–130. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24728122
Ingels, B. (2011). Responses. In Clog: Bjarke Ingels Group (pp. 102–111). CLOG.
Kayım, E. S. (2010, November 3). Dünya Mimarlık Festivali’ne Ingels ve Griffiths Dopingi [Ingels and Griffiths Doping to the World Architecture Festival]. Mimarizm Mimarlık ve Tasarım Yayın Platformu. https://www.mimarizm.com/haberler/dunya-mimarlik-festivali-ne-ingels-ve-griffiths-dopingi_116789
Knudsen, L. E. D. (2016, August 22-26). Context-free pragmatism in Danish campus architecture [Paper presentation]. 2016 ECER Leading Education: The Distinct Contributions of Educational Research and Researchers International Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 1–15. https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/contextfree-pragmatism-in-danish-campus-architecture(d6ba667e-9095-4513-8c3b-5bc673b2a0ff)/export.html
Lægring, K. (2017). Bjarke Ingels and The Return of Representation: A Challenge to The Post-critical. Architecture and Culture, 5(2), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2017.1328206
Levi-Strauss, C. (2000). Yaban Düşünce (La Pensée Sauvage). YKY.
Møller, A. (2013). Yes Is More: The BIG Philosophy. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/366660/yes-is-more-the-big-philosophy
Pallasmaa, J. (2016). Tenin Gözleri. YEM.
Pastor, C. E. (2012). La Arquitectura Diagramática Y Sostenible De BIG (BIG’s Diagrammatic and Sustainable Architecture). Revista de Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica, 20, 184-193. https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2012.1440
Sağdıç, Z. (2016). The 21st Century Architecture: Searching of The Concept. Megaron/Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture E-Journal, 11(1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.5505/megaron.2016.93064
Tschumi, B., & Cheng, I. (2003). The State of Architecture at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Monacelli.
Url-1: Hedonistik Sürdürülebilirlik, [Hedonistic Sustainability] XXI. Retrieved from https://xxi.com.tr/i/hedonistik-surdurulebilirlik
Url-2: Geçicinin Gerekliliği, [Necessity of the Temporary] XXI. Retrieved from https://xxi.com.tr/i/gecicinin-gerekliligi
Url-3: Lego House Images: Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/880900/lego-house-big
Url-4: Lego Tower Images: Retrieved from https://big.dk/#projects-lego
Url-5: Lego Tower Images: Retrieved from http://files.archinect.com/uploads/ai/aiu_LegoHousingBIG.jpg
Url-6: Lego Tower Images: Retrieved from https://www.designboom.com/architecture/big-architects-yes-is-more-exhibition/
Url-7: Mountain Dwelling Images: Retrieved from https://big.dk/#projects-mtn
Url-8: Mountain Dwelling Images: Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/15022/mountain-dwellings-big
Url-9: Mountain Dwelling Images: Retrieved from https://www.google.com/maps/place/Mountain+Dwellingsfirstname.lastname@example.org,12.5828625,14z/data=!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x465254baa9662891:0x812d83688f74c488!2sMountain+Dwellings,+2300+K%C3%B8benhavn,+Danimarka!3b1!8m2!3d55.63525!4d12.582917!3m4!1s0x0:0x1533b77107bf0ea3!8m2!3d55.6350579!4d12.5828624
Url-10: King Street West Images: Retrieved from https://big.dk/#projects-king
Url-11: King Street West Images: Retrieved from https://urbantoronto.ca/news/2016/04/bjarke-ingelsgroups-king-street-vision-detailed-consultation
Url-12: King Street West Images: Retrieved from https://urbantoronto.ca/news/2017/05/update-bigs-king-west-20-impresses-public-planning-less
Url-13: King Street West Images: Retrieved from http://kingtoronto.com/floorplansUrl-12
Url-14: King Street West Images: Retrieved from https://urbantoronto.ca/news/2020/10/excavation-setting-stage-rise-king-torontos-mountains
Url-15: 79 & Park Images: Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/905534/79-and-park-big
Url-16: 79 & Park Images: Retrieved from https://big.dk/#projects-st7
How to Cite
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.