ANALYSIS OF PERCEPTIONS OF DRIVER ABILITIES AND BEHAVIORS IN URBAN TRANSPORTATION WITH RESPECT TO GENDER IDENTITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2021.162

Abstract

Purpose

Gender inequality is a significant social problem of urban transportation planning. In this context, the main purpose of this study is to determine the stereotypes about the genders of drivers in Turkey. Additionally, the study also aims to reveal the relationship between the talents and behaviors of drivers and gender perceptions.

Design/Methodology/Approach

This study used a hybrid model which allows the use of qualitative and quantitative methods together. The survey method and focus group meetings were utilized at the stage of data collection. In the study, the quota sampling method was applied. The sample consisted of 1239 participants who lived in the province of Konya in Turkey, had a driver's license, drove more than 10 minutes a day and were between 18 and 68 years old. The questionnaires presented to the participants consisted of three parts. The first part included items on the demographic structure of the sample and driving information, the second part included the female driver evaluation form, and the third part included the male driver evaluation form. These driver evaluation forms were prepared as Likert-type scales in the form of a 37-item sets of perception/bias created by benefiting from the literature and focus group interviews.

Findings

Men are perceived more positively in terms of vehicle maintenance and driving ability. It is stated that female drivers have more positive driving behaviors than male drivers. The participants who are female, university graduates or whose spouse drives the car have biases that are significantly free from gendered role attitudes.

Research Limitations/Implications

The fact that the study was conducted only in a sample from Konya and the small number of focus groups that were interviewed constituted the limitations of the study.

Social/Practical Implications

Gender inequality is a significant social problem of urban transportation planning. To achieve social integration and utilize urban services more effectively, it is needed to try to eliminate prejudices/negative perceptions towards gender in traffic.

Originality/Value

This study, where determination of stereotypes regarding the gender of drivers and driver perceptions were focused on, is significant especially in terms of the literature in Turkish and has a unique value.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Seher OZKAZANC, Necmettin Erbakan University

Seher Özkazanç; Graduated from the Department of City and Regional Planning at the Faculty of Architecture at Gazi University in 2004. Received a master’s degree in 2008 and a doctoral degree in 2016 from the Department of City and Regional Planning at Gazi University. She is currently working as an Assistant Professor at Necmettin Erbakan University since 2017.

References

Acaroglu, R. (2014). Revize edilen hemşirelerin mesleki değerleri ölçeği Türkçe formunun güvenirlik ve geçerliği. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi, 22(2), 8-16.

Akanbi, O. G., Charles-Owaba, O. E., Oluleye, A. E. (2009). Human factors in traffic accidents in Lagos, Nigeria. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 18(4), 397-409.

Akerstedt, T., Kecklund, G. (2001). Age, gender and early morning highway accidents. Journal of Sleep Research, 10(2), 105-110.

Aycan, Ş., & Aycan, N.( 2014). Trafiğin yazılı olmayan kurallarının kadın sürücü ayağı. Karayolu Trafik Güvenliği Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, 63-72.

Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175-187.

Baxter, J. S., Manstead, A. S. R., Stradling, S. G., Campbell, K. A., Reason, J. T., Parker, D. (1990). Social facilitation and driver behavior. British Journal of Psychology, 81(3), 351-360.

Berger, M. L. (1986). Women drivers! The emergence of folklore and stereotypic opinions concerning feminine automotive behavior. Women’s Studies International Forum, 9(3), 257-263.

Bone, S. A., Mowen, J. C. (2006). Identifying the traits of aggressive and distracted drivers: a hierarchical trait model approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(5), 454-464.

Brison, R. J. (1990). Risk of automobile accidents in cigarette smokers. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 81(2), 102-106.

Brookland, R., Begg, D., Langley, J., Ameratunga, S. (2010). Risk perception and risky driving behaviours of adolescents and their parents: New Zealand drivers study. Injury Prevention, 16, A170.

Buyukozturk, S. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.

Caird, J. K., Willness, C. R., Steel, P., Scialfa, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(4), 1282-1293.

Chan, Y. H. (2003). Biostatistics 101: data presentation. Singapore Medical Journal, 44(6), 280-285.

Derks, B., Scheepers, D., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N. (2011). The threat vs. challenge of car parking for women: How self- and group affirmation affect cardiovascular responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 178-183.

EGM. (2016, June 15). Yıllara gore trafik kaza istatistikleri. http://trafik.gov.tr/istatistikler37

EGM. (2019, June 19). Trafik istatistik bulteni. http://www.trafik.gov.tr/kurumlar/trafik.gov.tr/04-Istatistik/Aylik/nisan19.pdf

Elander, J., West, R., French, D. (1993). Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 279.

Esiyok, B., Yasak, Y., Korkusuz, I. (2007). Trafikte ofke ifadesi: Surucu ofke ifadesi envanteri’nin gecerlik ve guvenilirligi. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(2),1-13.

Fountas, G., Pantangi, S. S., Hulme, K. F., Anastasopoulos, P. C. (2019). The effects of driver fatigue, gender, and distracted driving on perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior, A correlated grouped random parameters bivariate probit approach. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 22, 1-15.

Glendon, A. I., Dorn, L., Davies, D. R., Matthews, G., Taylor, R. G. (1996). Age and gender differences in perceived accident likelihood and driver competences. Risk Analysis, 16(6), 755-762.

Glendon, A. I., Mcnally, B., Jarvis, A., Chalmers, S. L., Salisbury, R. L. (2014). Evaluating a novice driver and pre-driver road safety intervention. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 64, 100-110.

Goodman, R. A., Istre, G. R., Jordan, F. B., Herndon, J. L., Kelaghan, J. (1991). Alcohol and fatal injuries in Oklahoma. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(2),156-161.

Granié, M. A., Papafava, E. (2011). Gender stereotypes associated with vehicle driving among French preadolescents and adolescents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 341-353.

Gulliver, P., Begg, D. (2004). Influences during adolescence on perceptions and behaviour related to alcohol use and unsafe driving as young adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(5), 773-778.

Hacısalihoglu, S. K. (2017). Trabzon trafiginde kadın surucu olmak. İmgelem, 1(1), 61-88.

Hoare, I. A. (2007). Attitudinal factors related to driving behaviors of young adults in Belize: An application of the precaution adoption process model. Graduate Theses and Dissertations.

IIHS. (2017, June 11). Fatality statistics. https://www.iihs.org/topics/fat ality-statistics/detail/gender

Juhnke, G. A., Sullivan, T. J., Harman, A. E. (1995). Attitude changes in DWI offenders: A study of a short-term treatment program. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 15(2), 51-58.

Kim, K., Brunner, I. M., Yamashita, E. (2008). Modeling fault among accident-Involved pedestrians and motorists in Hawaii. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(6), 2043-2049.

Klauer, S. G., Dingus, T. A., Neale, V. L., Sudweeks, J. D., Ramsey, D. J. (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Kose, E. (2014). Cinsiyet, teknoloji ve kent: otomobilin muglak heteronormativizmi. Fe Dergi, 6(1), 32-42.

Lajunen, T., Parker, D., Summala, H. (2004). The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire: A cross-cultural study. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(2), 231-238.

Lawrence, C., Richardson, J. (2005). Gender-based judgments of traffic violations: The moderating influence of car type1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(8),1755-1773.

Ma, L., Yan, X. (2014) Examining the nonparametric effect of drivers’ age in rear-end accidents through an additive logistic regression model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 67, 129-136.

Mangiaracina, G., Palumbo, L. (2007). While driving and its consequences on road safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 19(3), 253-267.

Massie, D. L., Campbell, K. L., Williams, A. F. (1995). Traffic Accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(1), 73-87.

Mcevoy, S. P., Stevenson, M. R., Woodward, M. (2006). Phone use and crashes while driving: A representative survey of drivers in two Australian states. Medical Journal of Australia, 185(11–12), 630-634.

Newnam, S., Mamo, W. G., Tulu, G. S. (2014) Exploring differences in driving behaviour across age and years of education of taxi drivers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Safety Science, 68, 1-5.

Ozdamar, K. (2016). Egitim, saglık ve davranıs bilimlerinde olcek ve test gelistirme yapısal esitlik modellemesi. Nisan Kitabevi Yayınları.

Ozkan, T., Lajunen, T. (2005). Multidimensional traffic locus of control scale (T-LOC): factor structure and relationship to risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(3),533-545.

Ozkan, T., Lajunen, T. (2006). What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers’ driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(4), 269-277.

Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., Stradling, S. G., Reason, J. T., Baxter, J. S. (1992). Intention to commit driving violations: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 94-101.

Parker, D., Stradling, S. (2001). Influencing driver attitudes and behaviour: Road Safety. Research Report No. 17.

Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.

Ram, T., Chand, K. (2016). Effect of drivers’ risk perception and perception of driving tasks on road safety attitude. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42(1), 162-176.

Rhodes, N., Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 923-931.

Rosenbloom, T., Ben-Eliyahu, A., Nemrodov, D., Biegel, A., Perlman, A. (2009). Committing driving violations: An observational study comparing city, town and village. Journal of Safety Research, 40(3), 215-219.

Rowe, R., Roman, G. D., Mckenna, F. P., Barker, E., Poulter, D. (2015). Measuring errors and violations on the road: A bifactor modeling approach to the driver behavior questionnaire. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 74, 118-125.

Sabbour, S. M., Ibrahim, J. M. (2010). Driving behavior, driver style and road traffic accidents among young medical group. Injury Prevention, 16(1), 1-13.

Sabey, B. E., Taylor, H. (1980). The known risks we run: the highway. In Societal Risk Assessment. Springer.

Santamarina-Rubio, E., Perez, K., Olabarria, M., Novoa, A. M. (2014). Gender differences in road traffic injury rate using time travelled as a measure of exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 65, 1-7.

Shao, A. T., & Zhou, K. Z. (2002). Marketing research: An aid to decision making. South-Western/Thomson Learning.

Shinar, D., Compton, R. (2004). Aggressive driving: An observational study of driver, vehicle, and situational variables. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(3), 429-437.

Sibley, C. G., Harre, N. (2009). A gender role socialization model of explicit and implicit biases in driving self-enhancement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6), 452-461.

Silas, O. A., Adoga, A. A., Isichei, C., Echejoh, G. O., Manasseh, M. N., Olu-Silas, R. A. (2011). Road traffic accident deaths as seen in a Tertiary Health Centre Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), Jos, North central, Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 2(2), 13-15.

Soliman, A., Alhajyaseen, W., Alfar, R., Alkaabi, I. (2018). Changes in driving behavior across age cohorts in an arab culture: The case of state of Qatar. Procedia Computer Science, 130, 652-659.

Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M. (2009). Human error taxonomies applied to driving: A generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Safety Science, 47(2), 227-237.

Stephens, A. N., Sullman, M. J. M. (2015). Trait predictors of aggression and crash-related behaviors across drivers from the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic. Risk Analysis, 35(9), 1730-1745.

Sullman, M. J., Paxion, J., Stephens, A. N. (2017). Gender roles, sex and the expression of driving anger. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 23-30.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.

Tavris, D. R., Kuhn, E. M., Layde, P. M. (2001). Age and gender patterns in motor vehicle crash injuries: importance of type of crash and occupant role. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(2), 167-172.

Teye-Kwadjo, E. (2011). Risk perception, traffic attitudes and behaviour among pedestrians and commercial minibus drivers in Ghana: A case study of Manya Krobo District. Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Ulutas, B., Sapaz, D., & Dumanlı, D. (2015). Ulaşım sektöründe kadın emeği: Ankara’da çalışan kadın sürücü ve makinistler. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 48(2), 141-164.

Unal, L., Ozdek, N., Unal, N., Kececi, B. (2017). Those women drivers again, cliché, being a woman in traffic. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Safety, 3(1), 88-109.

Vanlaar, W., Yannis, G. (2006). Perception of road accident causes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(1), 155-161.

Wang, B., Hensher, D. A., Ton, T. (2002). Safety in the road environment: A driver behavioural response perspective. Transportation, 29(3), 253-270.

Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Reimer, B., Lavalliere, M., Lesch, M. F., Horrey, W. J., Wu, S. (2010). The effect of feedback on attitudes toward cellular phone use while driving: A comparison between novice and experienced drivers. Traffic Injury Prevention, 11(5), 471-477.

Warner, H. W., Ozkan, T., Lajunen, T., Tzamalouka, G. (2011). Cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ tendency to commit different aberrant driving behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 390-399.

Wolf, C. C., Ocklenburg, S., Oren, B., Becker, C., Hofstatter, A., Bos, C., Gunturkun, O. (2010). Sex differences in parking are affected by biological and social factors. Psychological Research, 74(4), 429-435.

World Health Organization. (2013). Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action: summary (No. WHO. NMH. VIP 13.01). World Health Organization.

Yeung, N. C. J., von Hippel, C. (2008). Stereotype threat increases the likelihood that female drivers in a simulator run over jaywalkers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 667-674.

Zhou, H., Zhao, J., Pour-Rouholamin, M., Tobias, P. A. (2015). Statistical characteristics of wrong-way driving crashes on illinois freeways. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16(8), 760-767.

Downloads

Published

21-06-2021

How to Cite

OZKAZANC, S. (2021). ANALYSIS OF PERCEPTIONS OF DRIVER ABILITIES AND BEHAVIORS IN URBAN TRANSPORTATION WITH RESPECT TO GENDER IDENTITY . ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 9(1), 338–362. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2021.162

Issue

Section

Articles