INTERPRETING THE FACTORS IN FORMING THE SENSE OF PLACE: THE CASE OF KUZGUNCUK NEIGHBOURHOOD, ISTANBUL

Authors

  • Neslinur Hızlı Erkılıç Yildiz Technical University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-9220
  • Elifnaz Durusoy Özmen Research Assistant Dr., Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul
  • Hasan Taştan Research Assistant, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2021.159

Abstract

Purpose

Over the past few decades, cities have been subject to dramatic interventions such as rapid developments, increased modernization and capitalist production of spaces. These changes, occurring in parallel with globalization, have changed the long-lasting environmental perception and damaged the sense of attachment by transforming urban spaces into unidentified areas. In this regard, the main purpose of this paper is to explore the components of the sense of place and identifying its factors under the changing conditions. This conception aims to develop an integrated proposal that provides a better understanding of fluxional urban areas.

Design/Methodology/Approach

The methodology of this study consists of two parts; literature review and, field survey which adopts a qualitative approach through a web-based survey and semi-structured short interviews with locals. Within this scope, by chronologically reviewing the literature, the first part of the article questions how the sense of place can be defined and what components can serve to define its perception. In the second part, Kuzguncuk, which is one of the historical and most liveable neighbourhoods of Istanbul, is examined as the case study of this research. Due to its recent designation as an urban transformation area, the study focuses on to reinterpret Kuzguncuk according to its residents’ sense of place.

Findings

After the findings are obtained and evaluated with a five-point Likert scale, the effect levels of the components on the quality of urban areas and the satisfaction of the people in the neighbourhood are determined.

Research Limitations/Implications

Due to the pandemic measures, the survey conducted to the residents of Kuzguncuk was carried out digitally, and the interviews were realized by taking into account social distance.

Originality/Value

This paper foresees to contribute to the literature by developing an empirical study on the concept of sense of place with its descriptive and interpretive approach. Further studies, which can utilize the results of this article, may answer questions about how the components related to sense of place sought out and reinterprets these factors over historical places.

Author Biographies

Neslinur Hızlı Erkılıç, Yildiz Technical University

Neslinur Hızlı Erkılıç is Res. Asst. Dr. at Yildiz Technical University, Department of Architecture. She received her M.Sc. degree (2013) from Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University. She received her Ph.D. degree (2019) in Building Research and Programming of Yildiz Technical University. Her research interests include leftover spaces, urban open spaces, temporary interventions.

Elifnaz Durusoy Özmen, Research Assistant Dr., Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul

Elifnaz Durusoy Özmen is Res. Asst. Dr. at Yildiz Technical University, Department of Architecture. She received her M.Sc. degree (2013) in Conservation of Cultural Heritage Program of Middle East Technical University. She received her Ph.D. degree (2019) in Restoration Program of Yildiz Technical University. Her research interests include urban conservation, cultural landscapes and cultural routes.

Hasan Taştan, Research Assistant, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul,

Hasan Taştan is Res. Asst. and Ph.D. candidate at Yildiz Technical University, Department of Architecture. He received his M.Sc. degree (2016) in Building Research and Programming from Yildiz Technical University. His main areas of interest are social sustainability, user participation and post-disaster settlements.

References

Alexander, C., Silverstein, M., & Ishikawa, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford university press.

Aral, E. A. (2009). Redefining Leftover Space: Value and Potentiality for the City. VDM Publishing.

Asiliskender, B. (2004). Kimlik, mekan ve yer deneyimi. Kültür ve İletişim, 7(2), 73–94.

Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.

Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cullen, G. (1971). The Concise Townscape. The Architectural Press.

Cupers, K., & Miessen, M. (2006). Spaces of Uncertainty. Edit-Revue, 3 (Territoires), 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(14)60921-0

Jacobs, J. (2009). Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı (B. Doğan (ed.); (Orijinal). Metis Yayınları.

Kayden, J. S. (2000). Privately Owned Public Space: The New York Experience. John Wiley & Sons.

Krier, R. (1979). Urban Space. Academy Editions.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. MIT Press.

Mitchell, D. (1995). The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85(1), 108–133.

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418

PPS. (2013). What Makes a Successful Place? Project for Public Spaces. https://www.pps.org/article/grplacefeat

Punter, J. (1991). Participation in the design of urban space. Landscape Design, 200(1), 24–27.

Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.

Rowe, C., & Koetter, F. (1978). Collage City. MIT Press.

Schulz, C. N. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Academy Editions.

Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and Placelessness, Edward Relph. In & G. V. P. Hubbard, R. Kitchen (Ed.), Key Texts in Human Geography (pp. 43–51).

Sennett, R. (1978). The Fall of Public Man: On the Social Psychology of Capitalism. New York: Vintage Books.

Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Hill and Wang.

Trancik, R. (1986). Finding Lost Space: Theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons.

Villagomez, E. (2010). Claiming residual spaces in the heterogeneous city. In Insurgent Public Space (pp. 93–108). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

21-06-2021

How to Cite

Hızlı Erkılıç, N., Durusoy Özmen, E., & Taştan, H. (2021). INTERPRETING THE FACTORS IN FORMING THE SENSE OF PLACE: THE CASE OF KUZGUNCUK NEIGHBOURHOOD, ISTANBUL. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 9(1), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2021.159

Issue

Section

Articles