URBAN IDENTITY: A PROPOSAD METHOD FOR EVALUATING THE CONSERVATION OF HISTORICAL URBAN ENVIRONMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.133Keywords:
Historical environment conservation, Urban ıdentıty, Gaziantep, AntakyaAbstract
Purpose
Identity elements are the main determinants of urban perception and urban image. Evaluated in this sense, it is of great importance to create renewal and renovation works in the historical urban textures, which have had a unique character in the past and have survived to the present day, according to the ecological and socio-economic structure of the region. This study aims to evaluate the conservation and renovation works carried out in the urban protected areas in Gaziantep and Antakya based on the urban identity elements.
Design/Methodology/Approach
The urban identity elements to be evaluated in the study area were determined, and forms and charts were prepared to create these evaluations. Evaluation results based on 5-point Likert scale were weighted in accordance with expert opinions and conservation index maps were created based on the determined values and interpreted with the help of ArcGIS software. As a result of the quantitative evaluations, identity elements of the conservation activities and their effects on their environment were expressed with the help of maps
Findings
it has been determined that the value of the historical texture can be preserved by adopting the traditional fabric and faithful conservation works, moreover the additions and material changes have negative effects.
Research Limitations/Implications
In the study model was carried out in a narrow area, such as the Gaziantep and Antakya urban site area.
Social Implications
Uniform protection can be prevented by considering historical cities in a way that reflects their identity. Thus, it can be ensured that protection principles are determined according to the concepts of heritage and value and these values are passed on to future generations.
Originality/Value
Considering historical cities serve as cultural bridges, the article is important in terms of examining conservation in these cities.
Metrics
References
Cohen, N. (1999). Urban Conservation. The Mıt Press,Cambridge.
Çelik, D. (2004). Kentsel Peyzaj Tasarımı Kapsamında Tarihi Çevre Yenileme Çalışmalarının Peyzaj Mimarlığı Açısından Araştırılması: Beypazarı Örneği, Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi
Çelik, D., & Yazgan, M.E. (2007). Kentsel Peyzaj Tasarımı Kapsamında Tarihi Çevre Korumaya Yönelik Yasa ve Yönetmeliklerin İrdelenmesi, ZKÜ Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(11):1-10. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/barofd/article/view/5000057065/5000054276 Erişim tarihi:17.06.2018
Dhingra, M., Singh, M. K., & Chattopadhyay, S.(2016). Macro Level Characterization of Historic Urban Landscape: Case Study of Alwar Walled City. City, Culture and Society. 1-15.
Duymuş, H. (2018). Çevresel Algılamanın Kentsel Peyzaj Tasarımı Yönünden Değerlendirilmesinde Bir Model Önerisi: Tarsus Kenti Örneği, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Adana.
Eckbo, G.( 1969). The Landscape We See. Mc Graw Hill Book Campany, USA.
Erdönmez, M. E. & Akı, A. (2005). Açık kamusal kent mekanlarının toplum ilişkilerindeki etkileri. YTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi e-Dergisi, 1 (1): 67-87.
Esendemir, Ş. (2015). Şehrin Kökeni, Muhafazakar ve Modernist Halleri. Şehir ve Medeniyet. (9):32-37.
Güremen, L. (2011). Kent Kimliği Ve Estetiği Yönüyle Kentsel Donatı Elemanlarının Amasya Kenti Özelinde Araştırılması. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Social Sciences, 6, (2), 254-291.
Hergül, C.Ö. & Sayın, G. (2017). Küreselleşme Ekseninde Kent Kimliği Olgusunun İrdelenmesi. 6. Peyzaj Mimarlığı Kongresi. I. Cilt, 429-437, Antalya.
Kale, B. (2011).Tarihsel Kent Peyzajlarının Korunması, Hamamönü Örneği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Kara, A. (2005). 19. Yüzyılda Bir Osmanlı Şehri ANTAKYA. IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, 288 s.
Lynch, K., (1960). The İmage of the City, The Mıt Press,194 s, Cambridge.
Özer, M. N. (1998). Planlı ve Tasarlı Yaşam Alanlarının Kent Kimliği Üzerindeki Etkileri: Antalya Örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Radoslav,R., Branea, A.M., & Gaman, S.M. (2013). Rehabilitation Through a Holistic Revitalization Strategy of Historical City Centres Timisoara, Romania. Journal of Cultural Haritage (Elsevier) 14S(2013)e1-e6
Rodwell, D. (2014). Sustaınability and the Holistic Approach to the Conservation of Historic Cities. Journal Of Architecture Conservation, 9:1, 58-73.
Taşçıoğlu, S. (2018) .Kent Kimliği Açısından Tarihi Çevre Koruma Çalışmalarının Değerlendirilmesinde Bir Model Önerisi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Adana.
Tıesdell, S., Oc, T & Heath,T. (1996). Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters, Architectural Press,234p.
TMMOB, (2009). Tarihi Çevrede Koruma: Uygulamalar, Yaklaşımlar, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi, Ankara.http://www.mimarlarodasiankara.org/dosya/dosya14-1.pdf, Erişim tarihi:03.03.2016.
Velioğlu, A., Araz, A., & Tavşan, C.(1993) Koruma Olgusu İçinde Mimari Tasarım Süreci: Kavramsal, Kuramsal, Felsefi Yaklaşımlar, 1.Kentsel Koruma ve Yenileme-Uygulamalar Kolokyumu, Bildiriler Kitabı, s.208-216, 7-8 Nisan 1993, MSÜ, İstanbul
Yaldız,E. & Asatekin, G.N. (2016). Anıtsal Yapıların Yeniden Kullanımında İşlevsel Adaptasyonun, Mekânsal Analiz Yolu ile Değerlendirilmesi: Kayseri Sahabiye Medresesi, Türk-İslam Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 21:89-112.
Yuen, B. (2005). Searching For Places İdentity in Singapore.Habitat İnternational, 29(2), 197-214.
Wang, J. (2011). Problems and Solutions İn The Protection of Historical Urban Areas. Frontiers of Architectural Research(Elsevier).1:40-43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 