An Interstitial Reading of Istanbul
Keywords:interstices, Istanbul, Reading the city, urbanism, Urban complexity
As palimpsests of multiple layers of historic, geo-political, and socio-economic complexity, contemporary cities demand innovative methods of deciphering and unraveling their development. Typically referred to as reading the city, these methods of delayering and synthesizing urban complexity have, for long, pre-occupied urban planners and decisionmakers. Drawing from its interdisciplinary literature, this paper explores a comprehensive model of reading the city. Using a qualitative approach from both the archival and visual data sources, this study provides a better understanding of complex layers of urbanism that guide urban planners, policy makers and decisionmakers in developing more convenient solutions to urban problems. With multiple layers of its urbanism, Istanbul makes a suitable case study for this purpose. Identifying three types of developments (controlled or top-down, partially controlled and outlawed, bottom-up), different interactive networks provide sufficient grounds for reading Istanbul. Reading these intricate layers of Istanbul’s ‘closed’ and ‘open’ city (Sennett, 2017) in close proximity to a main transportation artery (D 100 highway) against the broader backdrop of its long history intertwined with geographic and socioeconomic push and pull forces provides a comprehensive tool for adopting similar methods for reading other cities.
Akbulut M R, Başlık S, 2011, “Transformation of Perception of The Gecekondu Phenomenon” Metu Journal of Faculty of Architecture 28 (2) 1-44.
Akgün A A, Baycan T, 2012, “Gated communities in Istanbul: the new walls of the city” TPR 83 (1) 87-109.
Akin N, 1998 19. Yuzyilin Ikinci Yarisinda Galata ve Pera (Istanbul Literatur) [Galata nad Pera in the Second Half of the 19th Century].
Aksoy A, Robins K, 1996, “Istanbul between civilization and discontent” City 5 (6) 6–33.
Aksoy A, 2012, “Riding the storm: ‘new Istanbul’” City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16 (1-2) 93-111.
Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, Jacobson M, Fiksdahl-King I, Angel S, 1977. A pattern language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (Oxford University Press, New York).
Alpkokin P, Ergun M, 2012, “Istanbul Metrobüs: first intercontinental bus rapid transit” Journal of Transport Geography 24 58–66.
Arefi M, 1999, “"Non-Place" and "Placelessness" as Narratives of Loss: Rethinking the Notion of 'Place'" Journal of Urban Design, 4 (2) 175-194.
Arefi M, 2004, “The pedagogy of the American city: revisiting the concepts of place, non-place, and placelessness” URBAN DESIGN International 9 103–117.
Arefi M, 2011, Order in Informal Settlements: A Case Study of Pinar, Istanbul,” Built Environment, 37 (1): 42-56.
Arefi M, 2013. “The structure of visual difference: A comparative case study of Mariemont and Lebanon, Ohio” URBAN DESIGN International 1-17.
Auge M, 1995 Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity (New York, Verso).
Ayataç H, 2007, “The International Diffusion of Planning Ideas: The Case of Istanbul, Turkey” Journal of Planning History, 6 114 – 137.
Aysan M, Demir O, Altan Z, Dökmeci V, 1997, “Industrial Decentralization in Istanbul & its Impact on Transport” Journal of Urban Planning & Development 123 (3).
Baharoglu D, Leitmann J, 1998, “Coping Strategies for Infrastructure: How Turkey's Spontaneous Settlements Operate in the Absence of Formal Rules” HABITATITNL 22 (2) 115-135.
Banerjee T and Verma N, 2005, “Sprawl and Segregation: Another Side of the Los Angeles Debate”, in Desegregating the City Ed. D Varady (State University of New York Press), pp 200 – 212.
Banham R, 1971 Los Angeles: The Architecture of Four Ecologies (Harper and Row, New York).
Barnett J, 1995 The Fractured Metropolis: Improving The New City, Restoring The Old City, Reshaping The Region (HarperCollins, New York).
Bilsel C, 2011 “Les Transformations d’Istanbul”: Henri Prost’s planning of Istanbul (1936-1951), ITU A|Z 8 (1) 100-116.
Blumenfeld, H.(1967). The Modern Metropolis: Its Origins, Growth, Characteristics, and Planning-Selected Essays by Hans Blumenfeld: Cambridge: MIT Press [cl967].
Boyer C, 1995 The great frame-up. Fantastic Appearances in contemporary politics in Spatial Practices Ed. Liggett, H and Perry, D C (Sage Publications).
Brenner N. and Theodore, N 2012 Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe (Blackwell)
Celik Z, 1993 The Remarking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Chase J. L Crawford M Kaliski, 1999 Everyday Urbanism (The Monacelli Press, New York).
Clay G, 1973 Reading the American city (University of Chicago Press).
Cullen G, 1961 Townscape (Architectural Press, GB).
Dear M, & Flusty S, 1998, “Postmodern Urbanism” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88 (1), 50-72.
de Certeau M, 1984 The Practice of Everyday Life. (University of California Press, Berkeley).
Dinçer I, 2011, “The Impact of Neoliberal Policies on Historic Urban Space: Areas of Urban Renewal in Istanbul” International Planning Studies 16 (1), 43-60.
Dokmeci V, Berkoz L, 1994, “Transformation of Istanbul from a monocentric to a polycentric city” European Planning Studies, 2 (2), 193–205.
Dokmeci V, Ciraci H 1999, “From Westernization to globalization: An old district of Istanbul”, Planning History, 21 (3), 13–23.
Elden S, 2004 Understanding Henri Lefebvre (Continuum Books, Great Britain).
Enlil Z M, 2011, “The Neoliberal Agenda and the Changing Urban Form of Istanbul” International Planning Studies, 16 (1) 5-25.
Erkip F, 2000, “Global transformations versus local dynamics in Istanbul” Cities 17 (5) 371-377.
Fogelson R M, 1967 Fragmented metropolis (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Fulton W, 1997 The Reluctant Metropolis: The Politics of Urban Growth in Los Angeles (Solano Press Books, California).
Graham S, Marvin S 2001 Splintering Urbanism (Routledge, New York).
Hall P, 2002 Cities of Tomorrow (Blackwell Publishing)
Hassenpflug D, Giersig N, Stratmann B, (Ed.) 2011 Reading the City: Developing Urban Hermeneutics [Stadt lesen: Beiträge zu einer urbanen Hermeneutik] (Verlag der Bauhaus-Universitat Weimar).
Jacobs J, 1961 Death and Life of Great American Cities (New York, Random House).
Karaman O, 2013 Urban Renewal in Istanbul: Reconfigured Spaces, Robotic Lives International Journal of Urban & Regional Research 37 (2) 715-733.
Kelbough D, 2001, “Three Urbanisms and the Public Realm”, Proceedings of 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium Atlanta.
Keyder C, 2005 “Globalization and Social Exclusion in Istanbul”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29 (1) 124–134.
Kostof S, 1991 The City shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Through History (Bulfinch Press).
Kostof S, 1992 The City assembled: The Elements of Urban Form Through History (Bulfinch Press).
Kuban D, 1996 Istanbul: An Urban History: Byzantion, Constantinopolis, Istanbul (Istanbul: Economic and Social History Foundation of Turkey).
Kurtuluş H, 2005 İstanbul’da Kentsel Ayrışma: Mekansal Dönüşümde Farklı Boyutlar (Bağlam, Istanbul) [Urban Segregation in Istanbul: Varied Dimensions in Spatial Transformation].
Lefebvre H, 1991 The production of space (Blackwell, Oxford).
Lefebvre H, 2009 Space and Mode of Production. In N. Brenner & S. Elden (eds.), Henri Lefebvre: State, Space World, (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).
Lynch K, 1960 The Image of the City. MIT Press: Massachussetts.
Mclaughlin E, Muncie J, 1999 “Walled Cities: Surveillance, Regulation and Segregation”, in Pile, S., Brook, C. and Mooney, G. (ed.) Unruly Cities, Order/Disorder, London; New York: Routledge in Association with the Open University.
Mumford L, 1938 The Culture of Cities (Harcourt, Brace and World Inc., New York).
Mumford L, 1961 The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects (Harcourt, Brace and World Inc., New York).
Öncü A and Weyland P 1997 Space, Culture & Power: New Identities in a Globalizing World (Zed Books).
Özüş, E.; Sence Türk, S.; Dökmeci, V. 2011 “Urban Restructuring of Istanbul.” Eur. Plan. Stud. 19, 331-356.
Pınarcıoğlu M, Işık O, 2007 “Not Only Helpless but also Hopeless: Changing Dynamics of Urban Poverty in Turkey, the Case of Sultanbeyli, Istanbul” European Planning Studies 16 (10).
Rapoport, A 1982 The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach (California: Sage Publication).
Relph E, 1976 Place and Placelessness (London: Pion).
Rybczynski W, 2010 Makeshift Metropolis (Scribner, New York).
Sassen S, 1991 The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton University Press).
Sassen S, 2007 Sociology of Globalisation (W.W. Norton and Company, New York).
Sassen S, 2010, “The Global City: introducing a concept” in Blackwell City Reader Ed. G Bridge and S Watson (Wiley-Blackwell) pp 126 - 132.
Scott A J and Soja E, 1996 The city: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the end of Twentieth Century (University of California Press).
Scott A J 2008, Social economy of metropolis. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Scott A J 2008, “Inside the City: On Urbanisation, Public Policy and Planning”, Urban Studies 2008; 45; 755-772.
Sennett, R 2017, The Open City, in Haas & Westlund (eds), In The Post-Urban World: Emergent Transformation of Cities & Regions in the Innovative Global Economy (London, Teylor & Francis).
Soja E, 2000 Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions (Blackwell Publishing, Great Britain).
Soja E, 2010 “Six discourse on postmetropolis” in Blackwell City Reader Ed. G Bridge and S Watson (Wiley-Blackwell) pp 374 – 381.
Tekeli I, Gülöksüz Y, Okyay T, 1976 Gecekondulu, Dolmuşlu işportalı Şehir • Gecekondulu, Dolmuşlu işportalı Şehir (Cem Yayinevi).
Terzi F, Bolen F, 2009, “Urban Sprawl Measurement of Istanbul”, European Planning Studies, 17 (10), 1559-1569.
Terzi F, Kaya S, 2011, “Dynamic spatial analysis of urban sprawl through fractal geometry: the case of Istanbul”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38, 175 - 190.
Tonnelat S, 2008, “`Out of frame': The (in)visible life of urban interstices - a case study in Charenton-le-Pont, Paris, France”, Ethnography, 9, 291-324.
UCTEA Chamber of Urban Planning Istanbul Branch 2010. 3rd Bridge Project Evaluation Report, 25 September 2013 retrieved from www.spoist.com.
URL-1.(2016). Retrieved.from http://www.arkitera.com/haber /26594/sulukulede-hukuksuzluk
Uzun N, 2010, “Urban governance in Istanbul”, Análise Social, 197, 757-770.
Wall E, 2011 “Infrastructural Form, Interstitial Spaces and Informal Acts” in Infrastructural Urbanism: Addressing The In-between. Ed. T. R. Hauck, R Keller, V Kleinekort (DOM Publishers, The UK).
Rittel H W J, Webber M W, 1973, “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning”, Policy Sciences 4, 155-169.
Webber, M. 1964. The urban place and non-place urban realm. In M.M. Webber and J.W. Dyckman, and D.L. Foley et al., Explorations into Urban Structure, pp. 79-153 (Philadelphia, PA, University of Pennsylvania Press).
World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, 2015, United Nations.
Zukin S 1995 The Culture of Cities. (Massachussetts, Blackwell).
Zukin S 2010 Nake City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
How to Cite
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.