Policy Recommendations for the Planning of Multi-Level Redevelopment and Social Housing Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.97Keywords:
Urban redevelopment, Social housing, Policy development, IstanbulAbstract
Considering the urgent need for intervention in areas affected by problems such as gecekondu settlement and earthquake risk, redevelopment is inevitable in Istanbul. Such interventions, however, have proven problematic in meeting the local community’s needs. There is a gap between the Istanbul experience and Western—in particular Western European—redevelopment practices, after which the Turkish experience has been modelled. The study aims to fill this gap through a review of these practices, a close examination of the hands-on redevelopment experience, and the lessons derived from two pioneering redevelopment projects in Istanbul: the gecekondu renewal of Ayazma-Tepeüstü and the earthquake-based regeneration in Sümer. 26 in-depth interviews were carried out with actors who influenced redevelopment decisions and those who were influenced by them. Data triangulation was employed to compare the two cases and reveal conflicting opinions and claims. Based on insights from informed practitioners (i.e. central government and metropolitan-level housing providers, local municipalities, and NGOs) and residents, the article analyzes the physical, financial, and community aspects of local redevelopment projects. It then derives policy sets for the planning of multi-level redevelopment and social housing practices as suggested by the project practitioners and community. This study argues that whether focused on renewal, regeneration, transformation, slum removal, or earthquake preparedness, redevelopment activities should pursue planning policies at both the general and local levels when designing a project and take into consideration the affected community’s inclusion and wellbeing in corresponding policies, including those of social housing.
Metrics
References
Aksoy, A. (2012). Riding the storm: ‘new Istanbul.’ City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 16(1-2), 93-111.
Bakçay-Çolak, E. (2012). Istanbul, a rebelling city under construction, Housing in Europe: Time to evict the crisis, 7, 34-40.
Balaban, M. Ş. (2019). Hazard-prone cities and recent challenges in the case of urban transformation experience of Turkey. In Ö. B. Özdemir Sarı, S. Özdemir & N. Uzun (Eds.), Urban and regional planning in Turkey (pp. 235-259). Springer, Cham.
Bartu-Candan, A., & Kolluoğlu, B. (2008). Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: A gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul, New perspectives on Turkey, 39, 5-46.
Couch, C. (1990). Urban renewal theory and practice. Basingstroke, UK: MacMillan.
DETR (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions). (2000). Our towns and cities–the future: Delivering an urban Renaissance. London: DETR/Stationery Office.
DOE (Department of Environment). (1997). Planning policy guidance: General policy and principles (Report No. PPG1). London: DOE/Stationery Office.
Ecumenopolis. (2012). Ecumenopolis: City without limits. Documentary written and directed by İmre Azem. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maE cPKBXV0M.
Egercioğlu, Y., & Özdemir, S. (2007). Changing dynamics of urban transformation process in Turkey: Izmir and Ankara cases. In Proceedings of the 47th International congress of the European Regional Science Association, Paris, France, 29 August-2 September, 1, 254-256.
Erdik, M., & Durukal, E. (2008). Earthquake risks and its mitigation in Istanbul, Natural Hazards, 44(2), 181-197.
Ersoy, M. (2001). Democratization through de-centralization? The Turkish case. Paper presented in the 1st World Planning Schools Congress, Shanghai, China, July.
Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration, Urban Studies, 42(5), 959-983.
Ezme, A. T. (2017). A Reading of Gecekondu as a Tool of Rapid Urbanization and Cheap Economic Development. In S. Çelik, O. Küçükahmetoğlu & J. Dobreva (Eds.), Contemporary Studies in Social, Economic & Financial Analysis (pp. 63-86). London: IJOPEC Publication Limited.
Gordon, C. (2003). Blighting the way: Urban renewal, economic development, and the elusive definition of blight. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 31, 305-337.
Gül, H., & Dulupçu, M. A. (2010). Local Economic Development, Urban Change and Regeneration in Turkey: Possibilities for Transcending Beyond Modernism. In J. Diamond, J. Liddle, A. Southern & P. Osei (Eds.), Urban Regeneration Management: International Perspectives (pp. 168-185). Routledge.
Güzey, Ö. (2009). Urban regeneration and increased competitive power: Ankara in an era of globalization, Cities, 26, 27-37.
Güzey, Ö. (2013). Evaluation of urban regeneration as a government-assisted revenue strategy in Turkey: the global imperative. In M. Leary & J. McCarthy (Eds.). The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration (pp. 86-96). Oxon: Routledge.
IFACCA (International Federation of Arts Councils and Culture Agencies). (2006). Arts and culture in regeneration (D’Art report No. 25). Sydney: IFACCA.
Karaman, O. (2014). Resisting urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Geography, 35(2), 290-310.
Kazgan, G. (1997). Küreselleşme ve yeni ekonomik düzen [Globalization and the new economic order]. Istanbul: Altın Kitaplar.
Kuyucu, T. (2018). Politics of Urban Regeneration in Turkey: Possibilities and Limits of Municipal Regeneration Initiatives in a Highly Centralized Country. Urban Geography, 39(8), 1152-1176.
Leary, M., & McCarthy, J. (2013). Conclusions and aspirations for the future of urban regeneration. In M. Leary & J. McCarthy (Eds.). The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration (pp. 569-584). Oxon: Routledge.
Lewis, J., & Ritchie, J. (2003). Generalising from qualitative research. In J. Ritchie & J. McCarthy (Eds.). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 263-286). London: Sage Publications.
Longa, R. D. (2011). Urban Models. In R. D. Longa (Ed.). Urban Models and Public-Private Partnership (pp. 7-46). Heidelberg: Springer.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of social research methodology, 11(4), 327-344.
O'Reilly, K. (2012). Ethnographic methods. Routledge.
Özdemir, D. (2011). The role of the public sector in the provision of housing supply in Turkey, 1950-2009. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6), 1099-1117.
Ramazanoğulları Turgut, S., & Çaçtaş Ceylan, E. (2012). In the wake of a local government initiative: Istanbul - Küçükçekmece Urban Regeneration Project. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In P. Roberts & H. Sykes (Eds.). Urban Regeneration A Handbook (pp. 9-36). Sage Publications.
Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (2000). Introduction. In P. Roberts & H. Sykes (Eds.). Urban Regeneration A Handbook (pp. 3-8). Sage Publications.
Shihata, I. F. (1997). Democracy and development. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 46(3), 635-643.
Sutton, S. (2008). Urban revitalization in the United States: Policies and practices. Final Report: United States Urban Revitalization Research Project (USURRP). Submitted to Seoul National University.
Tas, H. I., & Lightfoot, D. R. (2005). Gecekondu settlements in Turkey: Rural-urban migration in the developing European periphery. Journal of Geography, 104(6), 263-271.
TOKİ (Toplu Konut İdaresi Başkanlığı). (2019, July 31). Background. Retrieved from https://www.toki.gov.tr/en/ background.html.
Türk, Ş. Ş., & Korthals Altes, W. K. (2014). The applicability of inclusionary housing (IH) in Turkey. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), 507-520.
Turok, I. (1987). Local economic development in post-war Britain: Processes, policies and their evaluation. London: Avebury.
Uzun, C. N. (2003). The impact of urban renewal and gentrification on urban fabric: three cases in Turkey. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 94(3), 363-375.
Uzunçarşılı Baysal, C. (2013). Civilizing the Kurdish population of Ayazma: Ayazma/Tepeüstü urban transformation project-Küçükçekmece, Istanbul. Planning, 23(2), 83-94.
Varol, C., Ercoşkun, O. Y., & Gürer, N. (2011). Local participatory mechanisms and collective actions for sustainable urban development in Turkey. Habitat International, 35(1), 9-16.
Vickery, J. (2007). The emergence of culture-led regeneration: A policy concept and its discontents. West Midlands, UK: Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 