EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN TRADITIONAL HOUSES IN MERSIN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2021.149

Keywords:

Vernacular architecture, ecological design, Mersin traditional houses, ecology and architecture

Abstract

Purpose

Advances in technology and rapidly developing built environment lead to increased energy consumption and depletion of natural resources while harming the environment. The concept of ecological architecture emerged to generate solutions to these problems and various characteristics of traditional architecture, such as use of local and natural materials, energy saving etc. became important for contemporary ecological architecture. This paper addresses, from an ecological perspective, vernacular traditional architecture in Mersin, which has rapidly grown into a metropole from a 19th century Mediterranean port town. This study focuses on the ecological design components among traditional Mersin houses. The objective of this study is to reveal the relationships between vernacular traditional houses of Mersin and ecological architecture and to serve as a guide and reference for architects to design and construct in a way that they do not harm the natural environment and ecological balance by learning from vernacular architecture.

Design/Methodology/Approach

For the case study, 30 traditional houses located in Mersin old city centre, have been chosen to be inspected in terms of storey height, structural system, materials used for the construction, roof shape and materials, topography, selection of orientation, vegetation pattern, building form, spatial organisation, building envelope, use of renewable energy sources, sanitary installation and circulation systems. Yes and no scaled checklists were used to assess 30 traditional houses to identify the components of their ecological status and the quantitative data drawn from these checklists were used for the analyses of the urban texture.

Findings

It is observable from the analysis that traditional vernacular architecture of Mersin has various qualities that are compatible with ecological design criteria of our day.

Research Limitations/Implications

30 traditional houses which have not been restored, have been chosen in Mersin old city centre.

Originality/Value

The results presented in charts and diagrams are aimed to serve as design recommendations in today’s architectural practice in the area and as an ecological pattern in sustainable development projects performed in the future.

Author Biographies

Ebubekir Gündoğdu, İstanbul Kultur University

Ebubekir Gündoğdu currently works at Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality as an architect He received his M.Arch in architecture  from Istanbul Kültür University.

Emel Birer, İstanbul Kultur University

Emel Birer currently works at İstanbul Kültür University, Department of Architecture, as a Professor. She received her M.Arch and Ph.d  in architecture  from Yıldız Technical University.

References

Adıyeke, N., Adıyeke, N. (2004). Modernleşmenin Doğurduğu Kent: Mersin. Sırtı Dağ, Yüzü Deniz: Mersin, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Prep. Filiz Özdem, İstanbul, 69-89.

Akdeniz Kent Araştırmaları Merkezi Raporu, (2005), MEÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mersin Kültür Envanteri: Kentsel Kültür Varlıkları Belgeleme Projesi 1, Selim Ofset.

Akkaya, Y. (2004). 19. Yüzyıldan 20. Yüzyıla Mersin Ekonomisi, Sırtı Dağ, Yüzü Deniz: Mersin, (Hazırlayan: Filiz Özdem), Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul, 335.

Baran, M., M. Yıldırım, and A. Yılmaz, (2011). Evaluation of Ecological Design Strategies in Traditional Houses in Diyarbakir, Turkey, Journal of Cleaner Production 19.6-7: 609-619.

Bovea, M.D., Pérez-Belis, V., (2012). A Taxonomy of Ecodesign Tools for Integrating Environmental Requirements into the Product Design Process, Journal of Cleaner Production, 20: 61-71

Buldum, B., Külekçi M., K. (2008). Mersin İlinin Güneş Enerjisi Potansiyeli ve Mevcut Durumu, VII. Ulusal Temiz Enerji Sempozyumu, İstanbul.

Chandel, S. S., Sharma, V., Marwah, B. M. (2016). Review of Energy Efficient Features in Vernacular Architecture for Improving Indoor Thermal Comfort Conditions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, pp. 459-477

Crowther, R.L., (1992). Ecologic Architecture. Butterworth, Boston.

Develi, Ş. (2001). Dünden Bugüne Mersin, 1836-1837, Mersin Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası Yayını, 143.

Dizdar, İ. (2009). Mübadele ve Konut Bağlamında Mersin İhsaniye Mahallesi, TÜBA-KED, no:7, 125.

Erdoğan, E., Yıldız, E.N. (2017). The Evaluation of Kayseri, Ağırnas Traditional Houses in the Frame of Ecological Design, Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, VOL1/1, 64-72.

Gunewardene, N. (2016). Documentation of Vernacular Heritage in Architectural Education: ‘Measured Drawing of Devala Buildings’ with Level 1 Students of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, International Journal of Environmental Studies 73: 502–511. doi:10.1080/00207233.2016.1178983.

Gültekin, A., Bengu A, (2011). Ecological Building Design Criteria: A Case Study in Ankara. Gazi University Journal of Science 24.3, 605-616.

Kaptanoğlu, İ.Z., Mıhçıoğlu Bilgi, E. (2018). Conservation of Historic Sarıyer District in Istanbul: Improving Sustainability and Energy Efficiency of A Bosphorus Village, Megaron, v.4, 1.

Karahan, F., Davardoust, S., (2020). Evaluation of Vernacular Architecture of Uzundere District (Architectural Typology And Physical Form of Building) in Relation To Ecological Sustainable Development, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, DOI: 10.1080/13467581.2020.1758108

Karahan, E. Ergöz. (2017). Sustainability of Traditional and Contemporary Housing and Household Lifestyles: Case of Osmaneli//Geleneksel ve Günümüz Konutunda Sürdürülebilirlik ve Yaşam Alışkanlıkları: Osmaneli Örneği, Megaron 12.3: 497.

Karaosman, S. (2008), Vernacular Design as the Teaching Tool of the Ecological Architecture, Designtrain Congress, Trailer: II, Designing Design Education, Modern Education in Architectural Design Basics, 5-7 Haziran 2008, Amsterdam, Hollanda

Kırbaş, B., Hızlı, N. (2016). Learning from Vernacular Architecture: Ecological Solutions in Traditional Erzurum Houses, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences 216 (2016) 788 – 799.

Krusche, P., Althaus, D., Gabrıel, I., (1982). Okologisches Baunen, Herausgegeben vom Umweltbundesamt, Bauwerlag GmblH, Wiesbaden und Berlin, 22.

Li, Z., (2006). A New Life Cycle Impact Assessment Approach for Buildings, Building and Environment, Elsevier Ltd.

Lyle, J.T. (1985). Design for Human Ecosystems, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, 183-192.

Mazouz, S., Zarouala, M. S. (2013). The Derivaton and Re-Use of Vernacular Urban Space Concepts, Architectural Science Review, 42:1, pp. 3-13.

Oktay, D., (2002). Design with the Climate in Housing Environments: An Analysis in Northern Cyprus, Building and Environment Journal, 37 (2002) 1003–1012.

Sanchez, P.A.L., Medrano, F.J.S. (2015). Sustainable Architecture in the Traditional Rural Environment: Moratalla, Mileto, C., Vegas, F., Garcia, L., Cristini, V. (editörler), Vernacular Architecture: Towards a Sustainable Future, Londra, Taylor and Francis Group, s. 449-454.

Sayın, S. (2006), The Significance of the Use of Renewable Energy in our Country’s Building Sector and the Opportunities of Utilizing of Solar Energy in Buildings (Yenilenebilir Enerjinin Ülkemiz Yapı Sektöründe Kullanımının Önemi ve Yapılarda Güneş Enerjisinden Yararlanma Olanakları), M.Sc. Thesis, Selçuk University Institute of Science and Technology, Konya, Turkey.

Sözen, İ., Koçlar Oral, G. (2019). Evaluation of Parameters Affecting Energy Efficiency of Vernacular Mardin Houses: a case study, Megaron, Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture E-Journal, V14, s:1.

Şen, D.E., R.M. Sarı, S. Özgen ve A. Sağsöz, (2010). Design Principles of Nature Friendly House in the Context of Vernacular Architecture of Eastern Blacksea Region, Research Journal of International Studies, sayı:17.

Tönük, S. (2001). Bina Tasarımında Ekoloji, İstanbul, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Basım Yayın Merkezi, 50.

Toksöz, M.,(2006). Bir Coğrafya, Bir Ürün, Bir Bölge: 19. Yüzyılda Çukurova, Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sanat Kitabevi, Ankara, issue 21, 97-110.

TȘS, No: 318, s.365, h.no: 625, 25 Cemazeyilevvel 1298 (M. 25 Nisan 1881).

Ünlü, T.S., (2009). Bir İskeleden Liman Kentine Doğu Akdeniz’in Önemli Bir Limanı Olarak On Dokuzuncu Yüzyılın İkinci Yarısında Mersin’de Mekânsal Gelişim, Planlama Dergisi, V:3-4, 5-26.

Van Der Ryn, S., Stuart, C., (1996). Ecological Design, Island Press.

Vallet, F., (2012). Using Eco-design Tools: An overview of experts’ practices, Design Studies, 34.3, pp. 345-377

Yenişehirlioğlu, F. Müderrisoğlu, F. Alp, S. (1965). Mersin Evleri, T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.

Yenișehirlioğlu, F.Ç (2004). Mersin Evleri, Sırtı Dağ, Yüzü Deniz: Mersin, Prep: Filiz Özdem, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, First Edition, İstanbul, 177-189.

Yenişehirlioğlu, F., Özveren, E., Ünlü T.S. (Editors) (2019), Eastern Mediterranean Port Cities, A Study of Mersin, Turkey From Antiquity to Modernity, ISSN 2365-757X The Urban Book Series, Springer, pp,5.

Zorlu, T., Faiz, S., (2012). Çevre Duyarlı Mimarlık, Mimarlık Dergisi, Sayı: 367.

URL 1:https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,11472/tcanayasasi-56madde.html

date accessed: 12.06.2015.

URL2:https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=A&m=MERSIN) date accessed: 12.11.2020

Downloads

Published

21-06-2021

How to Cite

Gündoğdu, E., & Birer, E. (2021). EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN TRADITIONAL HOUSES IN MERSIN. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 9(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2021.149

Issue

Section

Articles