A NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF WOMEN’S USE OF SPACE IN TEHRAN MODERN HOUSING: 1960-1980

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.108

Keywords:

Tehran modern dwelling, everyday life, modern domesticity, modern women, use of space

Abstract

Purpose

Iran’s modernization process began from late nineteenth and early twentieth century with political and economic reforms that were followed by socio-spatial reforms. The state’s policy of modernization intensified in the 1960s to the late 1970s following the White Revolution and economic boom. Tehran was considered as the capital of modernization and a ground pattern for socio-spatial transformation in the country. The images of modern living spaces and modern society with a focus on women as agents of change and discontinuity were imported from the west. Modern socio-spatial ideas in confrontation with traditional and local ways of life transformed and adapted the status quo. The purpose of this study is to analyze the women’s use of modern domestic spaces constructed between the years 1960-1980 in Tehran, considering political, economic and socio-cultural dynamics.

Design/Methodology/Approach

The factors that affected use of space and adjustments were categorized in accordance to user profile, dwelling unit and settlement. The data was collected through in-depth interviews with twenty women and analyzed through narrative content analysis.

Findings

The results showed that several links existed between socio-cultural norms, women’s everyday life and use of space. Some of these connections represented demographic and economic sources, whereas others had physical, environmental and socio-political sources.

Research Limitations/Implications

Number of case studies were limited and making contact with the interviewees proved to be difficult due to security reasons of the settlements. Furthermore, in some instances it was challenging to have access to archives of buildings due to factors such as dissolution of companies in charge of planning in period of Iran Revolution (1978-9).

The significance of this study was to explore broader aspect of architectural design, housing development and evolution in Iran and leads to new perspectives in other fields such as socio-cultural studies.

Practical Implications

The investigation of practical aspect of modern housing through analyzing narratives of women dwellers provide useful analytical data for architects to consider factors such as household structure, privacy, everyday life and socio-cultural values in designing the domestic spaces.

Social Implications

A comprehensive study of the users in Tehran, based on the experience of women living there, unfolded a new level of findings. It showed that determinative factors on gender, domesticity and the use of space are deeply rooted within the context-specific social or cultural norms.

Originality/Value

The previous studies focused on political, social and economic aspects, whereas this study concentrated on gathering first-hand information from the occupants to provide data on the women’s use of space in modern houses.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Sepideh Davodipad

Sepideh DAVODIPAD graduated from Tabriz Azad University, Iran, Department of architecture in 2007 with M.Sc. degree. She had worked in different projects in Iran and Turkey. Currently, she is a Ph. D. stu-dent in architecture at Istanbul Technical University. Her research interests include modern domesticity, use of space and everyday life.

Fatma Ahsen Özsoy

Ahsen ÖZSOY studied architecture at Istanbul Technical University, received full professorship in 1995. She has taught architectural de-sign and theoretical courses such as psychology and architecture, housing research methodologies, etc. She has research studies and publications on topics of housing quality; urban transformation and housing design, creativity and university, post-occupancy evaluation and design participation. Administratively, she has served as Director of Institute of Social Sciences and Vice Rector of ITU.

References

Abrahamian, E. (2008). A History of Modern Iran. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Al‐Kodmany, Kh. (1999). “Residential visual privacy: Traditional and modern architecture and urban design”, Journal of Urban Design, 4 (3): 283-311.https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809908724452

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social Critique of the judgement of taste. (R. Nice, Trans.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1979)

Cieraad, I. (1999). At Home: an Anthropology of domestic Space. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.

Clandinin, D.J., & Connelly, F.M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

Edney, J.J. (1976). “Human territories: comment on functional properties”, Enviornment and behavior, 8 (1): 31. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657600800103

Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader. (Paul Rabinow Ed.). New York: Pantheon.

Ghannam, F. (2002). Remaking the modern: space, relocation, and the politics of identity in a global Cairo. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Los Angeles: University of California press.

Hayat Khan, T. (2014). Living with transformation: Self-built Housing in the City of Dhaka (Springer Briefs in Geography). Cham: Springer.

Heynen, H., & Baydar, G. (2005). Negotiating Domesticity: Spatial Production in Modern Architecture. London: Routledge.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karimi, Z. P. (2009). Transition in domestic architecture and home culture in twentieth century Iran (Unpublished PhD thesis). The Massachusetts institute of technology.

Karimi, Z. P. (2013). Domesticity and Consumer Culture in Iran: Interior revolutions of the Modern Era. London; Newyork : Routledge , Taylor and Francis Group.

Kent, S. (1990). Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space. Cambridge (England); New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. (D. Nicholson- Smith, Trans.), Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)

Little, D. (2002). American Orientalism: The United States and the Middle East since 1945. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.

Madanipour, A. (1998). Tehran: The Making of a Metropolis. Chichester: john Wiley & sons.

Munro, M. & Madigan, R. (1999). Negotiating space in the family home. In I. Cieraad (Ed.), At Home: an Anthropology of domestic Space (pp. 107-117). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

Michelson, W. (1994). Everyday life in contextual perspective. In I. Altman & A. Churchman (Eds.), Women and the Environment (pp. 17-42). New York: Plenum Press.

Pader, E. (1988). “Inside spatial relations”, Arch. Comport, Arch. Behav., 4 (3): 251-267.

Putnam, T. (1999). Postmodern home life. In I. Cieraad (Ed.), At Home: an Anthropology of domestic Space (pp. 144-152). Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. USA: Sage Publications.

Soja, E. W. (1980). “The socio-spatial dialectic”, Journal of Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70 (2): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x

Wilk, R. (1990). The built environment and consumer decisions. In S. Kent (Ed.), Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space (pp. 34-42). Cambridge University Press.

Wills C. (2001). “Women, domesticity and the family: recent feminist work in Irish”, Journal of Cultural Studies, 15 (1): 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380010006745

Downloads

Published

25-06-2020

How to Cite

Davodipad, S., & Özsoy, F. A. (2020). A NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF WOMEN’S USE OF SPACE IN TEHRAN MODERN HOUSING: 1960-1980. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8(1), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.108

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

COPYRIGHT POLICY 

1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.

2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:

The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.

The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.

If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.

The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues. 

The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs. 

3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles. 

4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material. 

5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name. 

6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.