CONSERVING MODERN ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE: REVIEW ON FIRST NUMUNE HOSPITALS OF TURKEY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.106Keywords:
Health facility architecture, modern architectural heritage, numune hospitals, conservationAbstract
Purpose
The new political approaches followed after the establishment of republic transformed the basic characteristics of many different dynamics in Turkey ranging from education and industry to art and architecture. The arrangements related to health services hold an important place among these fields and the great transformations seen in healthcare services necessitated the construction of hospital buildings with contemporary architectural qualities. In this framework, new hospital buildings known as “Numune” (Sample) Hospitals were established in Ankara, Diyarbakır, Erzurum and Sivas cities in 1924 to be good examples for further hospital buildings. In this context, the historical evolutions, architectural characteristics and current situations of these Numune hospitals are examined in this study together with an analysis of all the changes and interventions they were exposed to from past to present. This study aims to clarify the historical importance of Numune hospitals in question, address the changes they have undergone to date, criticize the interventions in the context of architectural history and conservation disciplines, and put forward various suggestions related to such disciplines. The search of the ways to provide the interrelationship of these buildings with the rapidly evolving current world by referring to the contemporary methods of different disciplines, constitutes one other basic aim of this study. The applications of the public authority of health services; namely the -Ministry of Health- and the other efficient dynamics related with the conservation of these buildings are also critically evaluated with respect to their roles on the sustaining of the architectural and historial values of these buildings.
Design/Methodology/Approach
The problems in preserving the original characteristics and showing respect to the historical values of these buildings are discussed by using the instruments and concepts of architectural history and conservation disciplines. Besides, some strategies are proposed for the preservation of these buildings with an awareness of the current conditions of health services in Turkey, and the possibility of the conflict between today’s conservation practices and health facility standards.
Findings
Taking into account contemporary approaches and the advanced conservation techniques being employed today, this study indicates that it is possible to make use of these structures by transforming their functions and maintaining their authentic values through proper applications. It is also expressed that a well-defined framework regarding that which structures are to be conserved according to which criteria could not be created, and that the decision-making mechanism focused solely on the conservation of the oldest structures.
Practical Implications
Some refunctioning and remediation strategies are presented for conserving the historical values of these Numune hospitals, while also improving their conditions as far as possible.
Social Implications
The concepts of heritage and value should be defined in a broader contextual framework and conservation principles should be revised according to these definitions.
Originality/Value
Considering these buildings serve as cultural bridges extending from the Ottoman era to the present and have important places in the historical development of healthcare facility architecture in Turkey, they hold symbolic values within the context of Turkish architectural history and heritage.
Metrics
References
Altay, S. (2015). Atatürk Dönemi Sağlık Politikalarının Halka Yansımasında Öncü Kurumlar: Numune Hastaneleri (1924-1938). Ankara University.
Başar, Z. (1979). “Erzurum Gureba Hastanesi ve Sonrası”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Bülteni, 4: 541–545.
Bozdoğan, S. (2012). Modernizm ve Ulusun İnşası Erken Cumhuriyet Türkiye’sinde Mimari Kültür. Metis Yayınları.
Budaktaş, Y. (2017). Numune Hastanesi Binası. http://www.sivasirade.com/haber/numune-hastanesi-binasi-14872.html
Çağlayan, E. (2013). “Diyarbakır’da Sağlık Alanındaki Gelişmeler [1923-1946] ”, The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(6): 351–365. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS1673
Cengizkan, A. (2011). Türkiye İçin Modern ve Planlı Bir Başkent Kurmak: Ankara 1920-1950 Die Gründung einer modeernen und nach Plan errichteten Haupstadt für die Türkei: Ankara 1920-1950. In L. Alpagut & A. Wagner (Eds.), Bir Başkentin Oluşumu: Avusturyalı, Alman ve İsviçreli Mimarların Ankara’daki İzleri = Das Werden einer Hauptstadt : Spuren deutschsprachiger Architekten.
Cumhuriyet. (2018). Numune Hastanesi’nin eski binası için yıkım tartışması. http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/turkiye/913573/Numune_Hastanesi_nin_eski_binasi_icin_yikim_tartismasi.html
Dündar, C. (2006). İlk Büyük Taahhüt İşim: Ankara Numune Hastanesi, Özel Arşivinden Belgeler ve Anılarıyla Vehbi Koç. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.
Ensonhaber. (2017). Sivas’ta hastane binası yıkımını çay içerek izlediler. https://www.ensonhaber.com/sivasta-hastane-binasi-yikimini-cay-icerek-izlediler-2017-04-02.html
Ergut, E. A. (2013). “Yirminci Yüzyıl Modern Mimarlık Mirası Korunmalıdır! DOCOMOMO_Türkiye: 10 Yılın Ardından... ”, Mimarlık, 371 http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=385&RecID=3160
ICOMOS-Türkiye. (2013). Mimari Mirası Koruma Bildirgesi. http://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSTR_0623153001387886624.pdf
ICOMOS. (1975). “The Declaration of Amsterdam (1975). In Congress on the European Architectural Heritage”, 12(October). https://www.icomos.org/en/and/169-the-declaration-of-amsterdam
Kamel-Ahmed, E. (2015). What to conserve?: Heritage, memory, and management of meanings. Archnet-IJAR. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i1.469
Küçükuğurlu, M. (2016). Erzurum’un Yüzleri Belediye Reisi Şerif Efendi. Atatürk University.
Madran, E. (2006). “Modern Mimarlık Ürünlerinin Belgelenmesi ve Korunması Süreci için Bazı Notlar”, Mimarlık, 332: 20–22.
Omay-Polat, E. E., & Can, C. (2008). “Modern Mimarlık Mirası Kavramı: Tanım ve Kapsam”, Megaron, 3(2): 177–186.
Sayek, F. (1998). Türk Tabipler Birliği Tarihe Giriş. Türk Tabipler Birliği. https://www.ttb.org.tr/ttb_tarihi/giris.html
Turgut, E. A. (2017). Modern Mimarlık Mirası Korunmalı mı? XXI Mimarlık, Tasarım ve Mekan. https://xxi.com.tr/i/modern-mimarlik-mirasi-korunmali-mi
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.