A REVIEW OF MODERNIZATION: THE GIRESUN GOVERNMENT HOUSE AND ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.121Keywords:
Administrative center, Giresun, government house, modernizationAbstract
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to discuss the Government houses erected in the latter Ottoman period, and the administrative centers erected in time by other public buildings located around over the changes they made to the urban space and in particular over the Giresun province periodical as a necessity and symbol of administrative modernization.
Design/Methodology/Approach
Giresun's modernization experience on the periphery was conducted by a periodic reading. The Late Ottoman Period is defined as the ‘First Steps of Modernization (the end of the 19th century)’; the first years of the Republic as the ‘Fundamental Modernization (the early 20th century)’; today is defined as ‘New Searches / Tendencies in Modernization (late 20th-21st century)’. The method of the study was determined by the collection of verbal, written, and visual data Type the design/methodology/approach of the paper here.
Findings
Buildings that were built, demolished, or changed their function in each period in the context of their own historical conditions, are part of the city's modernization process. Accordingly, the administrative center, which was erected during the Ottoman period, continued its functional and symbolic meaning for many years, but has recently started to lose this feature and its structural quality and meaning.
Research Limitations/Implications
Giresun is placed in the center of the study as a township in the Trabzon province in the late Ottoman period, and as a small port city in the Republican Age. The study focuses on the period from the late period of the Ottoman period to the present.
Originality/Value
Today, the building, which has begun to lose its effect, despite its urban, architectural, and symbolic value, should be evaluated in a way that respects the public interest and should continue to preserve its rightful value as an important part of the urban memory. This study is unique with contribution to studies related to a city that has not been placed in many urban, architectural, and historical studies and with its potential to increase sensitivity to periodical buildings in the city as one of the parts that complement the city's culture and identity.
Metrics
References
Anonymous (1933). Cumhuriyet’in on yılında Giresun (1923-1933). Giresun Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası, Işık Publisher.
Anonymous (1973). Cumhuriyetin 50. yılında Giresun. Giresun İl Yıllığı, Governorship of Giresun Publications.
Aslanoğlu, İ., İdil, B., İnan, U., Karaaslan, M., Ortaylı, İ., Özbek, N., Yatman, A. (1984). Osmanlı’dan bugüne hükûmet konakları (Causerie) Güven Birkan (Chair), Mimarlık, 203 (5), 3-5.
Avcı, Y. (2017). Osmanlı hükümet konakları. Türk Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.
Balcı, S. (2012). Giresun Rumları ve Gayrimüslim bir belediye başkanı. Libra Publications.
Bekdemir, Ü. (2015). İmar Çalışmaları, Ulaşım, Afetler ve Çevre Sorunları. In Bekdemir, Ü. and Fatsa, M. (Eds.). Geçmişten günümüze Giresun, Giresun İl Özel İdaresi Kültür Serisi.4 (pp. 250-278). Mavi Ofset Publisher.
Çadırcı, M. (1997). Tanzimat döneminde Anadolu kentlerinin sosyal ve ekonomik yapısı. Türk Tarih Kurumu Publications.
Çelik, Z. (2012). İmparatorluk, Mimari ve Kent, Garanti Kültür Publications.
Çetin, S. (2012). Geç Osmanlıdan Erken Cumhuriyete İç Batı Anadolu’da kentsel yapının değişimi: Manisa, Afyon, Burdur ve Isparta kentleri üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme, METU JFA 29(2), 89-126.
Düzenli, H.İ. and Taşar, E.S. (2012). Mardin’de Tarih, Bina ve Mimarlık Katmanları:19. yy. Hükümet Konağından 21. yy. Mimarlık Fakültesine Dönüşümün Hikayesi, Arredamento Mimarlık, 2012(2), 64-78.
Ersoy, A. (2009). Melezliğe Övgü; Tanzimat Dönemi Osmanlı Kimlik Politikaları ve Mimarlık, Toplumsal Tarih (189), 62-67.
Emecen, F. (1997). Giresun tarihinin bazı meseleleri, In Giresun Historical Symposium Proceedings Book (pp.19-24). Önder Publications.
Fatsa, M. and Sarıtaş, H.İ. (2012). Giresun merkezde Osmanlı Devri Vakıf Eser Kitabeleri, Vakıflar Dergisi, 38, 141-155.
Göle, N. (2000). Melez Desenler. Metis Publisher.
Hanioğlu, M.Ş. (2016). Modern Osmanlı Dönemi, In Heper, M. and Sayarı, S. (Eds.). Dünden bugüne Türkiye tarih, politika, toplum ve kültür, (pp. 17-26). Bilgi University Publications.
Mardin, Ş. (1999). Türk modernleşmesi. İletişim Publisher.
Işık, A. and Dervişoğlu, T., (2011). Ey Gidi Giresun. Özyurt Publisher.
İltar, G. (2014). Giresun Kültür Envanteri, Giresun Valiliği Yayınları, Dönence Publications.
İnalcık, H. (1962). Sened-i İttifak ve Gülhane Hatt-ı Hümayunu, Türk Tarih Kurumu; Belleten Dergisi, 112, 603-622.
İnsel, A. (2001), Modern Türkiye’de siyasi düşünce, Kemalizm. İletişim Publications.
Kabacaoğlu, G. and Dervişoğlu, T. (2019). Giresun Belediyesi ve Belediye Başkanları 1896-2014, Balcı, S. and İltar, G. (Eds), Giresun Belediyesi Publications, Çınaray Publishing.
Karaman, O. (1999). Giresun Kazası (1850-1900) [Doctoral thesis, Atatürk University Institute of Social Sciences]. Erzurum.
Karaman, O. and İltar, G., (2008). Giresun Üniversitesi rektörlük binasının tarihçesi, Giresun Üniversitesi Dergisi, 1, 21.
Kılıç, D. and Topal, İ. (2004). Salnamelerde Giresun’un sosyal ve dini yapısı (1869-1905), Karadeniz (Black Sea-ЧерноеМоре), 3 (12), 63-79.
Mercan, M. (2009). Giresun Telgraf Dairesi ve Telgrafhane Binası (1869 -1904), The Journal of International Social Research, 2(7), 159-174.
Ortaylı, İ. (2008). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda İdari modernleşme ve mahalli idare alanındaki gelişmeler, In Osmanlı’da değişim ve anayasal rejim sorunu, Seçme eserleri, II (pp. 263-277). Türkiye İş Bankası Publications, Turhan Publications.
Osmay, S. (1998). 1923’ten Bugüne kent merkezlerinin dönüşümü, In 75 yılda değişen kent ve mimarlık (pp. 139-155). Tarih Vakfı Publications.
Sunay, S. (2018). Son dönem Osmanlı taşra hapishanelerine bir örnek: Bolvadin Hapishanesi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 43-66.
Tekeli, İ. (1985). Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e kentsel dönüşüm, In Tanzimattan Cumhuriyet’e Türkiye Ansiklopedisi III (pp. 878-890).
Usta, V. (2011). Müdafaa-i Hukuk ve İstiklal Harbi tarihinde Giresun, Osman Fikret Topallı, Serander Publications.
Usta, V. and Çulfaz, M. (2017). Müdafaa-i Hukuk ve İstiklal Harbi tarihlerinde Giresun: Milli Mücadele günlerinden izler, intibalar, notlar, Serander Publications.
Umar, B. (1981), Eski Eserler Hukuku, Ege University Publications.
Yazıcı, N. (2014). Osmanlı mimarlığında bir yönetim binası örneği: Canik/Samsun Hükümet Konağı, In Şahin,İ., Egawa, H. (Eds.). CIEPO19- Osmanlı öncesi ve dönemi tarih araştırmaları (pp. 313-328). İstanbul Esnaf ve Sanatkarlar Odaları Birliği Publications.
Yerasimos, S. (1999) Tanzimat’ın Kent Reformları Üzerine, In Dumont, P. and Georgeon, F. (Eds.). Modernleşme sürecinde Osmanlı kentleri (pp. 1-19). Tarih Vakfı Yurt Publications.
Yeşilgiresun Newspaper, 5th September 1969, Giresun.
Yeşilgiresun Newspaper, 19th June 1920, Giresun.
Yüksel, A. (1997). Salnamelere göre Giresun bölgesinin idari durumu ve idarecileri, In Giresun Historical Symposium Proceedings Book (pp. 173-189). Önder Publications.
Yüksel, A. and Yeşilot, O. (2016). Giresun’da fındık ve Fındık Borsası’nın tarihçesi, Öncü Gazetesi Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.