FIRST YEAR STUDENTS’ VIEW OF ARCHITECTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.120Keywords:
Architectural education, architectural pedagogy, architecture, schemata, prejudice structuresAbstract
Purpose
The present study investigates architecture students’ pre-established schemata or prejudice structures towards architecture before their formal education starts. This would be particularly deemed important since architectural pedagogy might be tweaked or even reformulated accordingly.
Design/Methodology/Approach
The research employs “content analysis” which is a method that uses set of tools and procedures to read texts for generating knowledge-based inferences. On such a ground, the research is based on single-sentence answers given to a simple question asked to students: “what architecture is all about.” and the recordings of a follow-up open-ended discussion with the students on the initial findings. The data is evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Findings
Findings indicate a series of pretexts in students’ responses, particularly a residing (historical) determinism, a belief in zeitgeist, a conservatism, a pessimistic, passive understanding of architecture. On the other hand, they did not relate architecture to newness, change, difference, innovation, and they did not conceive architecture as an agent of these aspects. Research shows that students’ horizon of expectations and their preconceptions about architecture seem to be quite a mismatch with any trajectory of architectural education tradition that might take these notions as essential to itself and its intellectual core.
Research Limitations/Implications
The study is aimed to be part of baseline data for carrying out future investigations, a step toward more systematic analysis of changing state of today’s architectural education and a larger/global effort to map this phenomenon with its possible effects in architectural education.
Originality/Value
The study makes an original contribution to knowledge by being one of the first studies to focus on the question of “what architecture is all about” on behalf of the first-year architecture students in Turkey.
Metrics
References
Akin, O. (2001). Variants in design cognition. In C. M. Eastman, M. McCracken & W. Newstetter (Eds.). Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Elsevier.
Akin, O., & Akin C. (1996). Frames of Reference in Architectural Design: Analysing the Hyper Acclamation (A-h-a-!), Design Studies, 17, 341-361.
Anderson, S. (1987). The fiction of function, Assemblage, 2, 18-31.
Bartlett, F. C. (1995) Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (2007). Utopia deferred: Writings for Utopie (1967-1978). (trans.) Stuart Kendall. Columbia University, New York, Semiotext(e).
Boullée, E. L. (1976). Architecture, Essay on Art. In H. Rosenau (Eds.). Boullée & Visionary architecture. New York, Harmony Books.
Cary, J. (2017). Design for good: A new era of architecture for everyone. Island Press.
Choay, F. (2005). Utopia and the anthropological status of built space, In Exit Utopia: Architectural Provocations 1956-1976, Munich, Prestel.
Colquhoun, A. (1981). Essays in architectural criticism: Modern architecture and historicity. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Craig, D. L. (2001). Stalking Homo Faber: A Comparison of research strategies for studying design behavior. In C. M. Eastman, M. McCracken & W. Newstetter (Eds.). Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education, Elsevier.
Devlin, K. (1990). An examination of architectural interpretation: Architects versus non-architects. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 7 (3), 235-244.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-287.
Gadamer, H. G. (1976). Philosophical hermeneutics. University of California Press.
Gombrich, E. (1969). In search of cultural history: The Philip Maurice Deneke Lecture 1967. Clarendon Press.
Harries, K. (1997). The ethical function of architecture. Cambridge, Mass. The MIT Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1943). Philosophy of right. Oxford University Press.
Hollein, H. (1968). Everything is Architecture. Bau, no. 1/2.
Jacob, F. (1993). The logic of life, a history of heredity. Princeton Science Library.
Jameson, F. (2012). Varieties of the utopian. In Atlas of transformation, JRP-Ringier.
Jauss, H. R. & Benzinger, E. (1970). Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New literary history, no. 2 (1, A Symposium on Literary History).
Johnson, E. (1988). Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process. In The nature of expertise, Hillsdale New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kohls, C., & Scheiter, K. (2008). The Relation between Design patterns and schema theory. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP). Nashville, ACM.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications Inc.
Lawson, B. (2004). Schemata, Gambits and Precedent: Some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25 (5), 443-457.
Minsky, M. L. (1997). A Framework for representing knowledge. In Mind Design II. J. Haugeland. Cambridge, Massachusetts, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press.
More, T. (1988). Utopia. Cambridge University Press.
Newell, A. (1969). Heuristic programming: Ill-structured problems, Progress in Operations Research, 3, 361–413.
Oxman, R. (1994). Precedents in design: A computational model for the organization of precedent knowledge. Design Studies, no. 15 (2), 141-157.
Oxman, R. (2005). The Conceptual content of digital architecture: A content analysis in design. Arquitettura Revista, 1 (1).
Pevsner, N. (1957). An outline of European Architecture. Penguin.
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International University Press.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Pople, H. (1982). Heuristic methods for imposing structure on Ill-Structured problems: The structuring of medical diagnostics, in, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Boulder Colorado, Westview Press.
Popper, K. (1974). The Poverty of Historicism. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Popper, K. (1945). Open Society and Its Enemies. (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Reitman, W. (1964). Heuristic Decision Procedures Open Constraints and the Structure of Ill-Defined Problems, New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp 282–315.
Rowe, C. & Koetter, F. (1984). Collage city. Cambridge Mass., The MIT Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro R. J, Bertram C. B. and William F. B. (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education. Newark, International Reading Association.
Simon, H. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems, Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201.
Tafuri, M. (1976). Architecture and Utopia: Design and the Capitalist Development, (trans.). Barbara Luigia Penta. Cambridge Mass., London, England, The MIT Press.
Tschumi, B. (2012). Architecture concepts: Red is not a color: Rizzoli.
Vitruvius (1914). The ten books on architecture. Harvard University Press.
Vidler, A. (2001). Diagrams of Utopia, in C. Zegher and M. Wigley (Eds.). The activist drawing: Retracing situationist architectures from Constant’s New Babylon to beyond. Cambridge Mass., London, England, The MIT Press,.
Voss, J. & Post, T. (1988). On the Solving of Ill-structured problems, in, The nature of expertise. Hillsdale New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Sage Publications, Inj.
Webster, H. (2008). Architectural education after Schön: Cracks, blurs, boundaries and beyond, Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3 (2), 63-74.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 