Traces of the Past Utopias in Contemporary Architecture: Parasitic Architecture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.44Keywords:
Contemporary architecture, parasitic architecture, utopiaAbstract
Utopia, a phenomenon shaped in the frame of criticism, can be described as a proposal representing hope for the future. Architecture, which is a critical practice, creates new grounds for debate in the discipline with utopia designs. When utopian approaches of the past and contemporary architectural products are examined, it can be observed that utopias can be transformed into the facts of today. In this sense, this article aims to question whether contemporary approaches are inspired by the utopian propositions of the past. It was tried to be comprehended the utopian examples of parasitic architecture and the manifestations of currently produced samples. Examples were criticized with the aid of the analysis sheet prepared in the light of the specified parameters and the contributions of the utopias to the embodiment process of the design in the real world were questioned. In the context of parasitic architecture, it can be seen that approaches of both are similar. The accuracy of the thesis on that, no matter how much time passes over the utopian spatial productions, they continue to be valid and embody in the case of sufficient technology is debated. It is right to say that architecture continues to criticize, produce solutions for the current situations in every period, and doing so, it benefits from the pioneering attitude of utopias. In this sense, the article reveals that utopias are shaping both the human life and the future of architecture, and thus the traces of the past utopias can be encountered today.
Metrics
References
Akcan, E. (2011). Eleştirel Mimari Pratik ve Boğaçhan Dündaralp. Arredamento Mimarlık Dergisi. 3:111-112
Benhabib, S. (2005). Eleştiri, Norm ve Ütopya, Eleştirel Teorinin Temellerine Dair Bir İnceleme. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları
Brown, G. (2003). Freedom and Transience of Space (Techno-nomads and transformers). Robert Kronenburg (Ed.) Transportable Environments 2. London: Spon Yayıncılık. 3-13
Chanéac, J-L. (1972). Cellules Polyvalentes (Multi-Functional Cells). in Justus Dahinden (Ed.). Urban Structures For the Future. New York: Praeger Publishers
Coleman, N. (2011). Imagining and Making the World, Reconsidering Architecture and Utopia. Ralahine Utopian Studies: Volume 8. New York: Peter Lang
Entwistle, J. (Ed.) et al. (2013). Post Modernism. Lighting Journal. 78(3):35
Erkmen, N. M. (2008). Toplumsal Değişim ve İletişim Eleştirisi Olarak Ütopya ve Karşı-Ütopya: Aldous Huxley’in Cesur Yeni Dünya Romanı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ege University. Unpublished Master Thesis. Izmir
Hatuka, T., and D'Hooghe, A. (2007). After Postmodernism: Readdressing the Role of Utopia in Urban Design and Planning. Places. 19(2): 20-27
Hauart, D. R. (2015). Space for New Visions. A10 New European Architecture. 65:10
Hausermann, P. (1962). Habitation à Grilly France. L’Architectured’Aujourd’hui
Isozaki, A. (1962). Étude d’architecture Spatiale á Forte Concentration. L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui
Jameson, F. (2009). Ütopya Denen Arzu. Istanbul: Metis Yayınları
Kachri, G. (2009). Parasite Ecologies: Extending Space Through Diffusion - Limited Aggregation Models. University College London. Bartlett School of Gra¬duate Studies. Unpublished Master Thesis
Lefebvre, H. (1995). Yaşamla Söyleşi, Sosyalizm, Günlük Yaşam, Ütopya. Istanbul: Belge Yayınları
Senyücel, S. (Ed.) et al. (2011) Genç Mimar: Boğaçhan Dündaralp. Arredamento Mimarlık Dergisi. 3:117-131
Sevinç, A. (2005). İkinci Dünya Savaşı Sonrası Mimarlık Hayalleri: Ütopya Eskizleri. Istanbul Technical University. Graduate School of Science. Doctoral Thesis. Istanbul
Şensoy, G. (2016). Eleştiri Bağlamında Ütopya Önermeleri. Anadolu University. Graduate School of Science. Unpublished Master Thesis. Eskişehir
Tan, P. (2011). Mimarlık Sosyolojisine Girişin Olanakları. Arredamento Mimarlık Dergisi. 3:112-116
URL-1 http://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/2010/05/10/parasitical-architecture.html (18.03.2017)
URL-2.http://www.frac-centre.fr/collection-art-architecture/chaneac/cellules-parasites-64.html?authID=37&ensembleID=724 (23.12.2016)
URL-3 http://www.hiddenarchitecture.net/2016/12/cellules-parasites.html (23.12.2016)
URL-4 http://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/2014/12/17/haus-rucker-co_architecturalutopiareloaded.html (23.12.2016)
URL-5 http://www.spatialagency.net/database/haus-rucker-co (23.12.2016)
URL-6 http://inhabitat.com/stefan-eberstadts-rucksak-house-provides-instant-space-light-for-a-cramped-apartment/ (07.01.2017)
URL-7 http://inhabitat.com/parasitic-emergency-homes-can-be-implanted-onto-abandoned-buildings/ (08.02.2017)
URL-8 https://www.dezeen.com/2013/01/17/excrescent-utopia-parasitic-architecture-for-homeless-by-milo-ayden-de-luca/ (23.12.2016)
URL-9 http://www.archdaily.com/461696/a-kamp47-stephane-malka (23.12.2016)
URL-10 http://www.archdaily.com/412590/live-between-buildings-new-vision-of-loft-2-competition-entry-mateusz-mastalski-ole-robin-storjohann (08.02.2017)
URL-11 https://www.dezeen.com/2015/08/19/james-furzer-crowdfund-parasitic-sleeping-pods-london-homeless-indiegogo/ (23.12.2016)
URL-12 https://www.framlab.com/homed (12.12.2017)
Yıldırım, S. (2013). Urban Parasites: Re-appropriation of Interstitial Spaces in Architecture Through the Act of Graffiti. Middle East Technical University. Graduate School of Science. Unpublished Master Thesis. Ankara
Yorgancıoğlu, D. and Seyman Güray, T. (2018). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Alternatif Yaklaşımlar: Bir Mekân Tasarımı Stratejisi Olarak “Parazit Mimari”. Megaron Dergisi. 13 (1): 144-155
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.