Temporality and Memory in Architecture: Hagia Sophia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2017.26

Keywords:

Hagia Sophia, temporality, immortal building, place of memory

Abstract

Istanbul, having hosted many civilizations and cultures, has a long and important past. Due to its geopolitical locations, the city has been the capital of two civilizations—Ottoman and Byzantine Empires—which left its traces in the history of the world. Architectural and symbolic monuments built by these civilizations made an impression in all communities making the city a center of attraction. After each and every damage caused by wars, civil strifes, and natural disasters, maximum effort has been made to restore these symbolic buildings.

Attitude of a society to a piece of art or an architectural construction defined as historical artifact is shown in interventions, architectural supplementations and restorations to buildings to keep them alive. As a result of this attitude, it is accepted that buildings are perceived as a place of memory and symbolized with the city.

The most important symbolic monument of the city, Ayasofya (Hagia Sophia), was found as the Church of the Byzantine Emperor in the year 360, then converted into the Mosque of the Ottoman Sultan, and now serves as one of the best-known museums of Turkey. With architectural additions requested by Byzantine emperors and Ottoman sultans, restorations and other functional changes; Hagia Sophia had become a monument witnessing its own changes as well as its surroundings while collecting memories. Accordingly, Hagia Sophia can be described as an immortal building. 

Immortality is out of time notion, however it is a reflection of time effects as well. Immortality is about resisting to time. A construction from the past which appreciates as time passes will also exist in the future preserving its value. The building has been strengthened with the memory phenomenon formed during construction, incidents that the building witnessed in its location, restorations, architectural supplementations and the perception of the world heritage.

The main purpose of this presentation is to show how an intangible concept as memory concretizes in an architectural structure within the frames of immortality and time concepts by examining Hagia Sophia. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Yüksel Burçin Nur

Yüksel Burçin Nur was born in Germany. She got her B.Sc. degree (2013) in architecture and M.Sc. degree (2017) in “Building Design and Theory Division” at Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul. Yüksel Burçin Nur who has studied on Hagia Sophia and temporality in her thesis, has been working in an architectural office since 2013. 

Yasemen Say Özer

Dr. Yasemen Say Özer is Assoc. Prof. at Architecture Department of Yıldız Technical University. She got her M.Sc. degree in architecture at Mimar Sinan University, and phD at Yıldız University. In addition to her academic studies, she had been awarded in several architectural design competitions. She has been participating in excavation and research studies of Kaunos since 1989.

References

Ahunbay, Z. (2015). “Dünya Mirası Olarak Ayasofya ve Korumaya İlişkin Sorunlar”, Toplumsal Tarih Dergisi, 254: 86-91.

Akgündüz, A., Öztürk, S. and Baş, Y. (2006). Kiliseden Müzeye Ayasofya Cami. Osmanlı Araştırmaları Vakfı.

Başgelen, N. (1994). Prokopios 554 tarihli İstanbul’da Iustinianus Döneminde Yapılar- 1. Kitap. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.

Cerasi, M. (2005). “The Urban and Architectural Evolution Of The İstanbul Divanyolu: Urban Aesthetics and İdeology in Ottoman Town Building”, Brill, 22: 189-232.

Çift, P. ve Altunay, E. (2016). Ayasofya’nın Gizli Tarihi. 30. Baskı, Beyaz Baykuş Yayınları.

Diker, H. F. (2016). Ayasofya ve Onarımları. 1. Baskı, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakfı Üniversitesi Yayınları; 21.

Doğan, S. (2009). “Sultan Abdülmecid Döneminde İstanbul-Ayasofya Camii’ndeki Onarımlar ve Çalışmaları Aktaran Belgeler”, Bilig Dergisi,49: 1-34.

Eren, E. (1983). “Müze Çalışmaları (1969-1983)”, Ayasofya Müzesi Yıllığı, 9: 10-12.

Eyice, S. (1951). “Ayasofya Mozaikleri ve Bunları Meydana Çıkartan THOMAS WHITTE MORE”, Türkiye Turing ve Otomobil Kurumu, :3-12.

Eyice, S. (1991). “Ayasofya Kütüphanesi”, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi, 4. Cilt: 213-214.

Gurlitt, C. (1912). Die Baukunst Konstantinoples. Verlegt Bei Ernst Wasmuth A.-G.

Gurlitt, C. (1999). Architecture of Constantinople- Die Baukunst Konstantinoples. 1. Baskı, Enformasyon ve Dokümantasyon Hizmetleri Vakfı, Öncü Basımevi.

Gürzap, D. (2015). “Sinan’ın İstanbul’u”, National Geographic Türkiye Dergisi, 169: 53-85.

Günther, H. (2011). “Doğuda ve Batıda Antikitenin Yeniden Doğuşu”, Sinan and the Age of him – Architect Sinan International Symposium Memorial Events, (2010), pp. 221-236.

Heidegger, M. (1996). Beingand Time. State University of New York Pres.

Kostenec J. and Dark, K. (2014). “The Patriarchal Palace at Constantinople in the Seventh Century: Locating Thomaites and the Makron”, Ayasofya Müzesi Yıllığı, 14: 404-428.

Kuban, D. (1988). “Sinan’ın Dünya Mimarisindeki Yeri”, Mimarbaşı Koca Sinan: Yaşadığı Çağ ve Eserleri 1-2, Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, 581-624.

Kuban, D. (2010). Kent ve Mimarlık Üzerine İstanbul Yazıları. Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.

Lynch, K. (2010). Kent İmgesi. 1. Baskı, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.

Mango, C. (2006). Bizans Mimarisi. Kişisel Yayınlar, İstanbul.

Mainstone, R. J. (1998). Hagia Sophia Architecture, Structure and Liturgy of Justinian’s Great Church, 1. Baskı, Thames and Hudson Inc.

Necipoğlu, G. (2015). “Bir İmparatorluk Anıtının Öyküsü Bizans’tan Sonra Ayasofya”. Toplumsal Tarih Dergisi, 254:63-75.

Özcan, K. (2006). “Tanzimat’ın Kent Reformları: Türk İmar Sisteminin Kuruluş Sürecinde Erken Planlama Deneyimleri (1839-1908)”. Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2:149-180.

Özkan Aygün, Ç. (2010). “Ayasofya ve Topkapı”. National Geographic Dergisi, :54-71.

Özkan Aygün, Ç. (2006). “İstanbul Ayasofyası’nın Döşeme Altı Dehliz, Kuyu ve Su Sistemleri Araştırması 2005”, 24. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 1. Cilt, 29 Mayıs- 2 Haziran 2006, Çanakkale.

Öztürk, S. (2003). “İstanbul’un Fethinden Sonra Ayasofya’nın Camiye Çevrilişi”, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14: 133-142.

Şehsuvaroğlu, H. Y. (1953). Asırlar Boyu İstanbul, 1. Baskı, Cumhuriyet Gazetesi.

Talbot, A. M. (1993). “The Restoration of Constantinople under Michael VIII”. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 47:243-261.

Tunalı, İ. (1989). Estetik. 3.Baskı, Remzi Kitabevi.

Tümer, G. (2006). “Alternatif Mimarlık Tarihi Yazımı Üzerine Bir Deneme: FATALİST TARİH-ALTERNATİF TARİH”, Mimarlık Dergisi, 327: 46-53.

Underwood P.A. and Hawkins E.J.W. (1961). “The Mosaics of Hagia Sophia at Istanbul- The Portrait of the Emperor Alexander”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 15: 187-217.

Yamaoka, K., Hara, T. and Hidaka, K. (2013). “Study on Structural Dynamic Behaviors of Hagia Sophia through Micro-tremor Measurement”, The 2013 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM13), Jeju.

Yıldırım, S. Ö. (2008). Kentin Anlam Haritaları Gravürlerde İstanbul. Kitabistanbul.

Yücel, E. (2009). Ayasofya, 1. Baskı, Anadolu Turizm ve Tanıtım Yayınları.

http://www.pauldebevec.com/FiatLux/media/images/, 2016.

http://www.byzantium1200.com/hagia.html, 2015.

http://www.icomos.org.tr/?Sayfa=Duyuru&sira=39&dil=tr, 2015.

Downloads

Published

18-12-2017

How to Cite

Nur, Y. B., & Say Özer, Y. (2017). Temporality and Memory in Architecture: Hagia Sophia. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 5, 60–76. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2017.26

Issue

Vol. 5 (2017): SPECIAL ISSUE ''MEMORY OF PLACES''

Section

MP

License

COPYRIGHT POLICY 

1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.

2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:

The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.

The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.

If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.

The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues. 

The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs. 

3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles. 

4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material. 

5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name. 

6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.