Designing Neighborhood for Communal Activities: The Case of Low-Rent Housing for Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.37Keywords:
Rural-to-urban Chinese migrants (Nongmin gong), the extended family, low-rent housing, communal activities, transitional spaces, shared functionsAbstract
Chinese migrants transfer from their rural settlements to establish city lives, but their sense of identity and family network remain grounded in a village culture. The rich communal activities can be understood as one aspect of the adherence to the village culture and lifestyle of their rural settlements. This study investigates the transitional spaces combined with functions shared among such Chinese migrants in their urban settlements are to allow communal activities to emerge. The sharing of certain functions situated in the transitional spaces, namely, in front of the rental room, in front of the rental house and between the rental houses, always provides opportunities for communal activities to take place. I defend that the role played by the transitional spaces must be joined with functions that residents can share or must share with each other. The shared functions situated in the transitional spaces actually allow communal activities to take root.Metrics
References
Beja, J. P., & Bonnin, M. (1995). The Destruction of the" Village". China Perspectives(2), 21-25.
Bray, D. (2005). Social space and governance in urban China: The danwei system from origins to reform: Stanford University Press.
Cai, F. a. L., Y. F. (eds.). . (2001). Ways and channels of Chinese migration (1990-1999). Beijing: Social Science Literature Press.
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place (London): Architectural Press.
Chan, K. W., & Zhang, L. (1999). The hukou system and rural-urban migration in China: Processes and changes. In J. Logan (Ed.), The China Quarterly (Vol. 160, pp. 818-855).
Chen, T. a. Z., X. (1998). Micro-analysis of the development of the floating people’s settlement—empirical investigation of the development of the liudong renkou’s enclaves in Beijing. (Unpublished manuscript), Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Chung, H. (2013). Rural transformation and the persistence of rurality in China. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 54(5-6), 594-610.
Fan, C. C. (2002). The elite, the natives, and the outsiders: Migration and labor market segmentation in urban China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 103-124.
Gans, H. J. (1962). The urban villagers: Group and class in the life of Italians-Americans: [New York]: Free Press of Glencoe.
Graves, N. B., & Graves, T. D. (1974). Adaptive strategies in urban migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3(1), 117-151.
Jie, F., & Taubmann, W. (2002). Migrant enclaves in large Chinese cities. In J. R. Logan (Ed.), The new Chinese city: Globalization and market reform (pp. 181-197).
Li, S.-m., Zhu, Y., & Li, L. (2009). Community type, gateness and neighbourhood experiences: A study of Guangzhou, China: Centre for China Urban and Regional Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University.
Li, S.-m., Zhu, Y., & Li, L. (2012). Neighborhood type, gatedness, and residential experiences in Chinese cities: A study of Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 33(2), 237-255.
Lipman, A. (1971). Professional ideology:'community'and'total'architecture. Architectural Research and Teaching, 39-49.
Piante, C. a. Z., H. B. . (1995). A law onto itself-Beijing’s Zhejiang village. China Perspectives(2), 2-15.
Read, B. L. (2003). Democratizing the neighborhood? New private housing and home-owner self-organization in urban China. The China Journal(49), 31-59.
Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology: Jossey-Bass.
Su, P. (1996). The evolution of Chinese peasant communication model”, Shehui Kexue Zhanxian. Social Science Front(82).
Tian, L. I. (2008). The chengzhongcun land market in China: Boon or bane?—A perspective on property rights. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 282-304.
Whyte, M. K. a. P., W. L. . (1984). Urban Life in Contemporary China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum: University of Chicago Press.
Wu, F. (2012). Neighborhood attachment, social participation, and willingness to stay in China’s low-income communities. Urban Affairs Review, 48(4), 547-570.
Wu, W. (2002). Temporary migrants in Shanghai: housing and settlement patterns. In L. J. R. (Ed.), The new Chinese city: Globalization and market reform. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Xiang, B. (1993). Beijing has a Zhejing village—a study on spontaneous social transition of urbanization. Shehui Xue Yu Shehui Diaocha [Sociology and Social Survey], 3, 68-74.
Xu, A., Xie, X., Liu, W., Xia, Y., & Liu, D. (2007). Chinese family strengths and resiliency. Marriage & Family Review, 41(1-2), 143-164.
Xu, F. (2008). Gated communities and migrant enclaves: the conundrum for building ‘harmonious community/shequ’. Journal of contemporary China, 17(57), 633-651.
Yu, J. a. Y. X. (2013). Changes in the Determinants of Marriage Entry in Post-Reform Urban China. Retrieved from
Zhang, L., Zhao, S. X., & Tian, J. (2003). Self‐help in housing and chengzhongcun in China's urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 912-937.
Zhu, Q., & Wu, H. (2003). The cultural role and perception of agriculture in China. Paper presented at the the Roles of Agriculture International Conference. Rome, Italy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.