Urban Design and Experience in Ancient Sources: The Examples of Vitruvius and Pausanias (A Brief Assessment of Architectural Theories and Experience)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.368Keywords:
Ancient Sources, Pausanias, Urban design, VitruviusAbstract
This study examines the relationship between the theoretical design principles of ancient cities and narratives based on the use of built spaces through a comparative analysis of Vitruvius’ De Architectura and Pausanias’ Periegesis Hellados. The methodological approach of the research is based on the thematic analysis of urban elements in both texts, focusing on sacred spaces, the forum/agora, harbours, the relationship between the acropolis and the lower city, baths and palaestra/gymnasion complexes, and theatres. Vitruvius’ text approaches the city as a rational and generalizing system shaped by site selection, climatic and environmental conditions, orientation, proportion, building typologies, and engineering principles. Sacred spaces are defined through architectural order, orientation, and hierarchical placement; the forum is regarded as the centre of legal and economic activity, while harbours are considered as technical infrastructure components associated with waves, winds, and defensive elements. By contrast, in Pausanias the city is conveyed through a descriptive narrative unfolding along walking routes, articulated through the sequencing of sacred stations, mythological references, cult continuity, and local memory. The agora is presented as a public space in which ethical and identity-related meanings are concentrated; the harbour as a significant place charged with religious and political representations; and the acropolis as a higher space where historical and sacred meanings converge. While structures such as baths, gymnasia, and theatres are defined in Vitruvius through criteria of technical functionality, health, and performance, in Pausanias these spaces are associated with cult practices, social identity, and acts of remembrance. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that the ancient city should be evaluated not solely through planning and architectural principles, but also in relation to ritual practices, social memory, and spatial experience. The study argues that a combined reading of Vitruvius’ normative framework and Pausanias’ descriptive narrative offers a holistic approach to the study of ancient cities.
Metrics
References
Baldwin, B. (1990). The date, identity, and career of Vitruvius. Latomus, 49(2), 425-434.
Barker, E., Konstantinidou, K., Kiesling, B. & Foka, A. (2023). Journeying through space and time with Pausanias’s Description of Greece. Literary Geographies, 9(1), 124-160.
Bergmann, B. (2001). Meanwhile, back in Italy… Creating landscapes of memory. S. E. Alcock, J. F. Cherry & J. Elsner (Eds.), Pausanias: Travel and memory in Roman Greece (pp. 154-166). Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
Bianco, L. (2023). Architecture, engineering and building science: The contemporary relevance of Vitruvius’s De Architectura. Sustainability, 15(5), 1-27.
Daubner, F. (2022). Pausanias Book X: A detour to the fringes of “classical” Greece. A. Kouremenos (Ed.), The Province of Achaea in the 2nd Century CE: The Past Present (pp. 35-55). Abingdon-New York: Routledge.
Dinsmoor, W. B., Jr. (1980). The Propylaia to the Athenian Akropolis: The predecessors. Princeton: The American School of Classical Studies at Athens.
Drijvers, J. W. (2018). Travel and pilgrimage literature. S. McGill & E. J. Watts (Eds.), A companion to Late Antique literature, (pp. 359-372). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Elsner, J. (1992). Pausanias: A Greek pilgrim in the Roman world. Past & Present, 135, 3-29.
Elsner, J. (2001). Structuring “Greece”: Pausanias’s Periegesis as a literary construct. S. E. Alcock, J. F. Cherry & J. Elsner (Eds.), Pausanias: Travel and memory in Roman Greece (pp. 3-20). Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
Flohr, M. (2020). Fora and commerce in Roman Italy. Urban space and urban history in the Roman world (pp. 198-220). Abingdon-New York: Routledge.
Gates, C. (2021). Antik kentler: Antik Yakındoğu, Mısır, Yunan ve Roma’da kentsel yaşamın arkeolojisi (Trans. Barış Sezer). İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Haddad, N. A. (2026). Ancient theatre acoustical qualities reconstruction dilemma for modern use and the international charters. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 16(1), 94-108.
Hutton, W. (2005). Describing Greece: Landscape and literature in the periegesis of Pausanias. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
Incerti, M. (2013). Astronomical knowledge in the sacred architecture of the Middle Ages in Italy. Nexus Network Journal, 15(3), 503-526.
Iossifidis, T. (2024). Roman ports: Significance of their role, their structure and construction. Maritime Archaeology Graduate Symposium 2021 (25-26 November 2021), Short Report Series (pp. 1-16).
Jones, W. H. S. (1918). Life of Pausanias - The style of Pausanias. Pausanias: Description of Greece (Trans. W. H. S. Jones) (pp. ix-xxvii). London-New York: William Heinemann / Harvard University Press (The Loeb Classical Library).
Karababa, İ. Ü. (2022). On the classical sanctuary space and its natural context: Nature as extension or container?. Anadolu / Anatolia, 48, 103-127.
Kołoczek, B. J. (2022). Tell me a curious (hi)story: Historical content in Vitruvius’ De Architectura. Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae, 32(1), 57-78.
Lefas, P. (2000). On the fundamental terms of Vitruvius’s architectural theory. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 44(1), 179-197.
McKay, A. G. (1998). Houses, villas, and palaces in the Roman world. Baltimore-London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nielsen, I. (1990). Thermae et balnea: The architecture and cultural history of Roman public baths (Vol. I: Text). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Owens, E. J. (2000). Yunan ve Roma dünyasında kent (Trans. Cana Birsel). İstanbul: Homer Kitabevi.
Pausanias. (1886). Description of Greece (Trans. A. R. Shilleto, Vol. I-II). London: George Bell and Sons.
Lanciani, R. (1901). Forma Urbis Romae, Tavola 29. Mediolani: Ulricum Hoepli.
Preiser-Kapeller, J. & Ginalis, A. (2021). Introduction: Seasides of Byzantium and maritime dynamics in the Aegean Sea. J. Preiser-Kapeller, T. G. Kolias & F. Daim (Eds.), Seasides of Byzantium: Harbours and anchorages of a Mediterranean empire (pp. 9-21). Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums.
Pretzler, M. (2007). Pausanias: Travel writing in ancient Greece. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
Reitz-Joosse, B. (2016). The city and the text in Vitruvius’s De architectura. Arethusa, 49(2), 183-197.
Rook, T. (1978). The development and operation of Roman hypocausted baths. Journal of Archaeological Science, 5(3), 269-282.
Scranton, R. L. (1974). Vitruvius’ arts of architecture. Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 43(4), 494-499.
Sear, F. (2006). Roman theatres: An architectural study. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, T. G. (2003). Vitruvius on architecture. New York: The Monacelli Press.
Steinhauer, G. (2021). Piraeus: Harbors, navy, and shipping. J. Neils & D. K. Rogers (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Athens (pp. 231-243, Map 16.1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vitruvius. (1914). The ten books on architecture (Trans. M. H. Morgan). Cambridge: Harvard University Press / Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press.
Wycherley, R. E. (1986). Antik Çağ’da kentler nasıl kuruldu? (Trans. N. Nirven ve N. Başgelen). İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
Yaylı, H. & Küçük, A. B. (2011). Sosyal bölünme-kent dokusu ilişkisinin ilkel örneği olarak Roma. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 121-138.
Yegül, F. (1993). Vitruvius ve De architectura. Vitruvius: Mimarlık üzerine on kitap (Trans. Suna Güven) (pp. ix-xvii). İstanbul: Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı Yayınları.
Yegül, F. (2006). Antik Çağ’da hamamlar ve yıkanma. İstanbul: Homer Kitabevi.
Image Sources: URL-1: iStock.com/scaliger, URL-2: iStock.com/Guven Ozdemir, URL-3: iStock.com/irisphoto2, URL-4: iStock.com/milangonda, URL-5: iStock.com/katatonia82, URL-6: iStock.com/Anze Furlan/psgtproductions
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 