Assessing Local Climate Impact on Energy and Emission Performance in Türkiye’s Standardized Post-Disaster Housing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.356

Keywords:

Climate-based design, CO₂ emissions, Energy efficiency, Standardized housing, TOKİ

Abstract

Designing energy-efficient buildings for reconstruction in disaster areas is essential for mitigating environmental challenges and supporting sustainable recovery. However, in Türkiye, standardized mass housing is often implemented following disasters for rapid reconstruction, frequently overlooking local climatic conditions. The Housing Development Administration of Türkiye (TOKİ) has initiated standardized mass housing projects across 11 provinces in the disaster area of the 2023 Türkiye-Kahramanmaraş earthquake. This study conducts a comparative analysis of heating and cooling energy consumption and CO₂ emissions for a reference TOKİ housing using DesignBuilder simulations across the 11 impacted provinces, to show the environmental impact of standardized material selection. The evaluated archetype features a rectangular geometry with a symmetrical floor plan, comprising 20 dwelling units and a fixed façade configuration governed by orientation. The façade consists of reinforced concrete shear walls, vertically perforated brick walls, and PVC-framed double-glazed windows. The analysis utilized the updated climate zoning of the Turkish Standard for Thermal Insulation in Buildings (TS 825), which recently expanded from four to six climate zones. Findings indicate significant variations: intra-zone annual heating and cooling energy consumption differed by up to 184.85% and 52.84%, respectively. CO₂ emissions showed relatively limited differences, with a maximum of 12.35% intra-zone. These findings show that energy consumption varies significantly both between and within climate zones, highlighting the limitations of relying solely on generalized climate zone data for building design and material selection. Moreover, an evaluation of the latest TS 825 revision shows that the updated classification does not yield consistent heating and cooling energy outcomes for certain provinces. The study concludes that province-specific climatic data should be integrated into post-disaster housing design, particularly during material selection, to improve energy efficiency, reduce emissions, and support sustainable recovery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Bahar Başarır, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi

Bahar Başarır, PhD, is an architect, researcher, and Assistant Professor at the Department of Architecture, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University. She specializes in construction technology, with a core focus on advanced façade design and retrofit. Her expertise lies at the intersection of sustainable façade technologies, architectural detailing, constructability, and industrialization.

Gonca Özer Yaman, Bingöl University

Gonca Özer Yaman is an academic and researcher at the Department of Architecture, Bingöl University. Her research focuses on building energy performance, sustainable architecture, thermal comfort, passive design strategies, and building energy simulation. She has published research on building energy performance, climate-responsive design, and sustainable building design.

Ebru Doğan Koç, Malatya Turgut Özal University

Ebru Doğan Koç, Assoc. Prof. Dr., is an architect, researcher, and lecturer. Her research focuses on building and construction technologies in architecture. Her expertise encompasses sustainable building technologies and design, along with conservation in buildings, environments and settlements.

Gürkan Kavuran, Malatya Turgut Özal University

Gürkan Kavuran, PhD is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, researcher, and project coordinator. His work focuses on artificial intelligence, robotics, control systems, signal processing, and embedded technologies. His expertise lies at the intersection of intelligent systems, automation, data-driven modeling, and real-world engineering applications.

Beyzanur İnce, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi

Beyzanur İnce, Ph.D. candidate, is an architect and researcher. She focuses on construction technologies, sustainable design strategies, and circularity in the built environment. Her doctoral dissertation develops a life cycle assessment framework for building products incorporating end-of-life scenarios to support product selection decisions in architectural practice.

Gökçe Dağteke, Fırat University

Gökçe Dağteke is an architect, researcher, and research assistant. She received her master's degree from Fırat University and is currently pursuing her Ph.D. at Gebze Technical University. Her research focuses on the building and construction technologies in architecture, information and communication technologies in architecture, Building Information Modeling (BIM), and architectural education.

References

Abdou, Y., Kim, Y.K., Abdou, A., & Anabtawi, R. (2022). Energy optimization for fenestration design: Evidence-based retrofitting solution for office buildings in the UAE. Buildings, 12(10), 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101541.

Arslan, H.D., Bilgili, S.M.A., & Doğan, S. (2024). Farklı iklim bölgelerinde TOKİ tip konutlarının doğal havalandırma analizi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.47112/neufmbd.2024.30.

Aşıkoğlu Metehan, A., Şenel Solmaz, A., Gök, O., & Tokuç, A. (2025). Adapting to climate change: Assessing future residential energy demands for different climate and occupancy scenarios in Turkey. Buildings, 15(8), 1255. doi:10.3390/buildings15081255.

Begen, B. (2020). İklim değişikliğine uyumda yeşil sertifikasyonların yeri: Kırklareli-TOKİ örneği üzerinden bir değerlendirme [Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Presidency National Thesis Center.

Bektaş, A. (2013). Binalarda rüzgar enerjisi kullanımının farklı bölgeler açısından değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir çalışma: TOKİ Tarımköy projesi örneği [Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Presidency National Thesis Center.

Cengiz, H.T., Zorer Gedik, G., & Korkmaz, E. (2024). Yapıların cam alanlarının enerji etkin iyileştirilmesi ve FDM uygulamasının enerji performansına etkisinin değerlendirilmesi: İstanbul ve Diyarbakır örnekleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(4), 2395-2408. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.1337385

Climate One Building. (n.d.). Repository of Building Simulation Climate Data, From the Creators of the EPW. Retrieved May 09, 2025, from https://climate.onebuilding.org/

Crawley, D.B., Hand, J.W., Kummert, M., & Griffith, B.T. (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 43(4), 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.027

Çetintaş, K.F., & Yılmaz, Z. (2019). Konut binaları için ısı yalıtım malzemesinin ve optimum yalıtım kalınlığının belirlenmesine yönelik yeni bir yaklaşım. Tesisat Mühendisliği (169), 15-30.

Çiçek, Y. (2019). Bina cephelerinde yaygın olarak kullanılan malzemelerin ısıl performanslarının farklı iklim bölgelerine göre karşılaştırılması: TOKİ örneği [Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Presidency National Thesis Center.

Ebrahimi-Moghadam, A., Ildarabadi, P., Aliakbari, K., & Fadaee, F. (2020). Sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization of energy consumption and thermal comfort by using interior light shelves in residential buildings. Renewable Energy, (159), 736-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.127

Elgohary, S.M., Abdin, A.R., & Mohamed, R.M. (2023). Performative driven form finding in the early design stage. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 70(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00225-5

Harkouss, F., Fardoun, F., & Biwole, P.H. (2018). Passive design optimization of low energy buildings in different climates. Energy, (165), 591-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.019

Haydaraslan, S.K. (2021). Binaların tasarım stratejilerinin simülasyon optimizasyonuna dayalı olarak değerlendirilmesi: Çok katlı konut yapıları TOKİ örneği [Doctoral Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Presidency National Thesis Center.

IZODER. (n.d.). Association of Thermal, Water, Acoustic, and Fire Insulation Professionals, Innovations Introduced by the New TS 825 Standard. Retrieved June 25, 2025, from https://www.izoder.org.tr/dosyalar/Yeni%20TS%208252024%20Standard%C4%B1%20ve%20Is%C4%B1%20Yal%C4%B1t%C4%B1m%C4%B1.pdf

Javid, A.S., Aramoun, F., Bararzadeh, M., & Avami, A. (2019). Multi objective planning for sustainable retrofit of educational buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, (24), 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100759

Kavuran, G., Özer Yaman, G., Başarır, B., Doğan, E., İnce, B., & Dağteke, G. (2026). AI-supported decision framework for sustainable reconstruction: Case study on TOKİ housing after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake. Energy, 344, 139891. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.139891.

Liu, Y., Li, T., Xu, W., Wang, Q., Huang, H., & He, B.J. (2023). Building information modelling-enabled multi-objective optimization for energy consumption parametric analysis in green buildings design using hybrid machine learning algorithms. Energy and Buildings, (300), 113665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113665

Mangan, S.D., & Oral, G.K. (2013). Türkiye’nin farklı iklim bölgelerinde bir konut binasının enerji etkin iyileştirilmesi [Conference session] 11. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi. İzmir, Türkiye.

Mousavi, S.N., Gheibi, M., Wacławek, S., Smith, N.R., Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., & Behzadian, K. (2023). Low-energy residential building optimisation for energy and comfort enhancement in semi-arid climate conditions. Energy Conversion and Management, (291), 117264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117264

Najjar, M., Figueiredo, K., Hammad, A.W., & Haddad, A. (2019). Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings. Applied Energy, (250), 1366-1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.101

Özüer, M.O. (2012). Binalarda enerji korunumunu sağlayan fiziksel çevre ölçütleri. Beykent Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 5(1-2), 95-107.

Sun, Y., Wilson, R., & Wu ,Y. (2018). A review of transparent insulation material (TIM) for building energy saving and daylight comfort. Applied Energy, (226), 713-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.094

Sümengen, Ö., & Yener, A.K. (2015). Binalarda aydınlatma enerji performansının belirlenmesinde günışığına ilişkin değişkenlerin incelenmesi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 31(2), 135-148.

Taştemir, İ.A. (2020). Farklı iklim bölgelerinde yapı kabuğunda ısıl kütlenin bina enerji etkinliğine ve ısıl konforuna olan etkisi [Master Thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University]. Council of Higher Education Presidency National Thesis Center.

Tuna, M., Harputlugil, G.U., & Çelebi, G. (2010, March 4-5). Sürdürülebilir tasarım hedefine doğru: Örnek konut binasının enerji performansı potansiyelinin değerlendirilmesi [Conference session]. Yapı Fiziği ve Sürdürülebilir Tasarım Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye. https://tinyurl.com/yztpxsnk

Turkish Ministry of Environment, Urbanization, and Climate Change, Ministry Activities. (2023, February 19). Deprem Bölgelerinde, 830 Bin 783 Binadaki 3 Milyon 273 Bin 605 Bağımsız Birimde Hasar Tespit Çalışması Yapıldı. Retrieved July 09, 2023, from https://csb.gov.tr/deprem-bolgelerinde-830-bin-783-binadaki-3-milyon-273-bin-605-bagimsiz-birimde-hasar-tespit-calismasi-yapildi-bakanlik-faaliyetleri-38439

Turkish Ministry of Environment, Urbanization, and Climate Change General Directorate of Meteorology, Climate Classifications. (n.d.). İklim Sınıflandırması. Retrieved July 26, 2025, from https://www.mgm.gov.tr/iklim/iklim-siniflandirmalari.aspx

Turkish Ministry of Environment, Urbanization, and Climate Change General Directorate of Meteorology, Analysis of Meteorological Parameters. (n.d.). Resmi İklim İstatistikleri. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=parametrelerinTurkiyeAnalizi

Turkish Standards Institute. (1998). TS 825: 1998 Turkish Standard for Thermal Insulation in Building. Retrieved May 10, 2025, from https://www.mekaniktesisat.net/uploads/3/9/8/6/39866781/ts_825_binalarda_Is%C4%B1_yal%C4%B1t%C4%B1m_kurallar%C4%B1.pdf

Turkish Standards Institute. (2008). TS 825: 2008 Turkish Standard for Thermal Insulation in Building. Retrieved May 13, 2025, from https://yunuslaryalitim.com.tr/images/dosyalar/ts825-yonetmelik.pdf

Turkish Standards Institute. (2024). TS 825: 2024 Turkish Standard for Thermal Insulation in Building. Retrieved September 13, 2025. Obtained from Turkish Standards Institute with special permission.

Ünsal, B. (2012). Bir TOKİ konut örneğinde ısıtma ve soğutma enerji yüklerinin farklı iklim bölgelerine bağlı olarak değerlendirilmesi [Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Presidency National Thesis Center.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Başarır, B., Özer Yaman, G., Doğan Koç, E., Kavuran, G., İnce, B., & Dağteke, G. (2026). Assessing Local Climate Impact on Energy and Emission Performance in Türkiye’s Standardized Post-Disaster Housing. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 14(1), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.356

Issue

Section

Articles