Visual Data Browsing in the Design Process: Interior Architecture Students’ Approaches to the Use of Social Networking Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.360Keywords:
Design process, Interior architecture, Interior architecture education, Social networking platforms, Visual dataAbstract
This study examines the visual data browsing approaches of interior architecture students through social networking platforms (SNP) in the design process. Based on the characteristics of the research group, the study aims to reveal the contributions of SNP to interior architecture education and the emerging trends in this context. Within this aim, a total of 298 students from the Interior Architecture and Environmental Design Departments of Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University and Hacettepe University participated in the study. A questionnaire including 28 questions was used to assess the use of SNP during the design process, usage habits, preferred platforms, and data collection methods. The findings indicate that interior architecture students actively use SNP in the design process for purposes such as design innovations, seeing different design approaches, getting inspiration or learning new techniques. It has been determined that as the level of education differs, differences may occur in the students' approaches to bringing together visuals and analysing existing designs better to create original designs. It was determined that students generally use SNP for professional projects and design content, and that weekly and daily use is common. It has been observed that 3rd grade students benefit from SNP more than students in other educational levels. No significant differences were found between universities; Pinterest was found to be the most preferred platform. Despite the limited negative effects of SNP, such as distractions and reliability issues, it was concluded that their conscious and balanced use, contributes academically and professionally to the design education process.
Metrics
References
Abdul Kadir, S. (2020). The use of social media in millennials’ teaching and learning activities in design-related course. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(13), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2087
Agusintadewi, N. K., Mahastuti, N. M. M., Darma, K. A. S., & Aritama, A. A. N. (2021). The use of social media in the creation of personal learning environment during the #studyfromhome period. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.17851
Al Hashimi, S., Al Muwali, A., Zaki, Y., & Mahdi, N. (2019). The effectiveness of social media and multimedia-based pedagogy in enhancing creativity among art, design, and digital media students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(21), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i21.10596
Alacacı Torun, E. (2019). Kavramsal tasarım sürecinde Pinterest’te görsel veri taramanın yaratıcı düşünceye etkisi: Deneyimli ve deneyimsiz tasarımcılar üzerine bir inceleme [Master’s thesis, Istanbul Technical University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
Allen, B., Caple, H., Coleman, K., & Nguyen, T. (2012, November 25-28). Creativity in practice: Social media in higher education. [Conference presentation]. ASCILITE: Future challenges—Sustainable futures, Wellington, New Zealand.
Akçay, A. Ö., Baysen, F., & Çakmak, N. (2021). Architecture students’ smartphone use in Design Studio I. In D. Soitu, Š. Hošková-Mayerová, & F. Maturo (Eds.), Decisions and trends in social systems (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 189, pp. 313–322). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69094-6_25
Akgün, F. (2016). Öğretmenlerin ve öğretim elemanlarının sosyal ağların eğitimsel açıdan kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri. Trakya University Journal of Social Science, 18(1), 75–100.
Akyüz, H. E. (2018). Yapı geçerliliği için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi: Uygulamalı bir çalışma. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.414490
Atar, M. (2022). Scrutinizing social media use in the concept developing phase of design process of architecture students [Master’s thesis, Bahçeşehir University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
Castells, M. (2023). The network society revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(7), 940-946. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221092803
Chai, J. X., & Fan, K. K. (2018). Constructing creativity: social media and creative expression in design education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79321
Cheston, C. C., Flickinger, T. E., & Chisolm, M. S. (2013). Social media use in medical education: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 88(6), 893-901. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffc23
Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M. H. (2020). Students’ use of social media in collaborative design: a case study of an advanced interior design studio. Cognition, Technology and Work, 22(4), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00597-w
Dwijendra, N. K. A., & Yogantari, V. M. (2019). From manual to digital: The importance of social media in promoting the artwork of architectural design in the disruption era. Proceedings of the 4th ICIAP: Design and Planning in Disruptive Era (pp. 231–239). https://www.academia.edu/38397238/
Erçevik Sönmez, B. (2020). Different educational approaches in design studio. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8(2), 720–744. https://doi.org/10.15320/iconarp.2020.134
Eryılmaz, M. (2017). Sosyal medyanın e-öğrenmedeki rolü. In Bilişim 2017: TBD 34. Ulusal Bilişim Sempozyumu (pp. 21–24). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2045. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2045/06_Bilisim_2017_paper_7.pdf
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Gillet, D., El Helou, S., Chiu, M. Y., & Salzmann, C. (2008). Turning Web 2.0 social software into versatile collaborative learning solutions. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction (ACHI 2008) (pp. 170–176). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACHI.2008.22
Gilman, S., & Vincent, A. (2013). Pinteresting possibilities. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 32(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1086/669995
Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2016). Inspiration choices that matter: The selection of external stimuli during ideation. Design Science, 2, e10. doi:10.1017/dsj.2016.10
Gök Tokgöz, Ö., & Altin, M. A. (2022). The development of Internet Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 and its effects on architectural education. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A: Applied Sciences and Engineering, 23, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1171044
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
Güler, K. (2015). Social media-based learning in the design studio: A comparative study. Computers & Education, 87, 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.004
Gürdağ, B., Akkavak, K. K. & Elibol, G. C. (2018). Tasarım eğitiminde alternatif mekân olarak sosyal medya. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 8(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.7456/10802100/002
Ham, J. J. (2013). The evolution of media use in the design studio: Why are students not engaging in the cutting edge? In M. A. Schnabel & J.-Y. Tsou (Eds.), Cutting edge in architectural science: Proceedings of the 47th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2013 (pp. 1–10). Architectural Science Association.
Ham, J. J., & Schnabel, M. A. (2011). Web 2.0 virtual design studio: Social networking as facilitator of design education. Architectural Science Review, 54, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2011.582369
Ilter, A. T. (2020). Social networks and architecture: Possible benefits for design education? In Thresholds in Architectural Education (pp. 183–196). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119751427.ch14
Ilter, A. T., & Karacar, P. (2017). Mobile technology and social networks: Mapping architecture students’ practice and awareness for educational possibilities. In EDULEARN17 Proceedings (pp. 6820–6827). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.2573
Izadpanah, S. (2021). Evaluating the role of Pinterest in education and the profession of interior architecture. Idil Journal of Art and Language, 10(87). https://doi.org/10.7816/idil-10-87-01
İnce, M., & Koçak, M. C. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanım alışkanlıkları: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi örneği. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(2), 736-749. Doi:10.14230/joiss430
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Korzynski, P., Paniagua, J., & Rodriguez-Montemayor, E. (2020). Employee creativity in a digital era: The mediating role of social media. Management Decision, 58(6), 1100–1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2018-0586
Kurt Cavuş, Ö., & Kaptan, B. B. (2022). Tasarım düşüncesi bileşenleri ve iç mimarlık eğitimi çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 12(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1133803
Özgür, S. (2019). Bir mimesis olarak mimarlık ve emsal bilgisi [Doctoral dissertation, Istanbul Technical University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
Özsavaş Uluçay, N. (2017). Görsel tasarım eğitiminde sosyal medyanın kullanımı. The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 54, 372–379. https://doi.org/10.16992/asos.12784
Özteke Aysal, İ., Yazıcı, A. B., & Çalgüner, A. (2024). The role of social media in shaping industrial design practices: Insights from Turkish practitioners. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 12(2), 323-335.
Pérez Nanclares, C. M., & Del Blanco García, F. L. (2024). Innovation in architecture: The role of digital technologies and social networks in academic education. VISUAL REVIEW: International Visual Culture Review I Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 16(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v16.5227
Pourahmad Ghalejough, A., Hashempour, P., Haghparast, F. (2022). Creativity, design studio performance, and social media: A study of Instagram use among architecture students. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, 32(2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.528
Scolere, L. (2019). Digital inspirational economy: the dialectics of design. Information, Communication & Society, 24(9), 1192–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1684543
Scolere, L. (2023). Connected design learning: Aspiring designers, Pinterest, and social media literacy. Journal of Interior Design, 48(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717641231184214
Taşdelen, H. S. (2018). Mimarlığın dijital habitus’u: Erken tasarım sürecinde internet kullanımı [Master’s thesis, Istanbul Technical University]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
Toğay, A., Akdur, T. E., Yetişkin, İ. C., & Bilici, A. (2013). Eğitim süreçlerinde sosyal ağların kullanımı: Bir MYO deneyimi. In XIV. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı (pp. 1–6). https://ab.org.tr/ab13/bildiri/302.pdf
Tümer, E. (2022). Architectural praxis in Turkey in the era of social media: Pinterest and Instagram [Master’s thesis, European University of Lefke]. YÖK National Thesis Center.
Weaver, A. C., & Morrison, B. B. (2008). Social networking. Computer, 41(2), 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.61
Yıldız, D., & Uzunsakal, E. (2018). Alan araştırmalarında güvenilirlik testlerinin karşılaştırılması ve tarımsal veriler üzerine bir uygulama. Uygulamalı Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 14–28.
Zhang, G., Mao, S. (2023). A double-edged sword: Social media use and creativity. Information Technology & People, 38 (2), 660–685. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2022-0682
Zhou, Y. (2021). Impacts of social media on language learning: A review of literature. In Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021) (pp. 743–749). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211220.128
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 