The Use of Terminology Regarding the Protection of Interior Designs as “Designs” under Industrial Property Rights: An Evaluation through the Stakeholders’ Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.365

Keywords:

Design protection, Industrial property rights, Intellectual property law, Interior design

Abstract

Throughout history, similar but different terms have been used for decoration/interior decoration, interior design, and interior architecture. The literature indicates that there are certain differences between the scope and outputs of the terminology in question. However, both in theory and in practice, it is observed that terms such as interior design and decoration/interior decoration are still frequently used, and their scope and outcomes are often confused. It is thought that the prejudices that have emerged in this process have led to the terminology of interior design, which is a discipline distinct from decoration/interior decoration, to be approached in a reductionist manner in terms of scope and outputs. In particular, in the “design” protection, the term “interior design” is not included in regulatory texts such as the Locarno Classification System and the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (TÜRKPATENT) Design Examination Guide; instead, terms such as “presentation (get-up),” “interior layout,” and “interior arrangement” are used. This study addresses the problems created by the terminology used in regulatory texts regarding the protection of interior designs as “designs” under the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 (IPC) and the effects of these problems in practice. The study uses a qualitative research method; patent and trademark attorneys involved in design registration application processes, court experts involved in evaluation processes, judges currently serving or who have served at the Intellectual and Industrial Property Rights Court, and experts from the TÜRKPATENT Design Department and Copyright General Directorate. The data obtained through semi-structured interviews with a total of 32 participants was analyzed using content analysis, focusing on terminology usage, and the findings were grouped under three different themes. It was determined that the terminology used could lead to an incomplete or misleading perception of interior designs. In this context, alternatives and a systematic approach to terminology usage were proposed.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

İsmail Bezci, Hacettepe University

İsmail Bezci, Ress Asst. (PhD), works at Hacettepe University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design. His work areas are interior architecture, furniture design, intellectual property rights art. His recent research focuses on the protection of interior designs as “designs” and “works” within the scope of intellectual property rights, as well as new methods in furniture design, conceptual studies in interior design protection within industrial property rights.

Gülçin Cankız Elibol, Hacettepe University

Gülçin Cankız Elibol, Prof. Dr. (PhD), works at Hacettepe University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design. Her work areas are design, industrial design, furniture design and industrial property rights. Her recent works include, new methods in furniture design, conceptual studies in design protection within industrial property rights.

References

Adams, A., & Tancred, P. (2000). Designing women: Gender and the architectural profession. University of Toronto Press.

Alawad, A. A., Bettaieb, D. M., & Malek, R. B. (2022). Plagiarism of the implicit concept in interior design projects: Does it exist?. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 21(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222211029292

Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press.

Archer, B. (1968). The structure of design processes [Doctoral dissertation, Royal College of Art]. RCA Archive. https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/id/eprint/2949

Bezci, İ., & Elibol, G. C. (2021). İç mekan tasarımlarının 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu kapsamında korunmasına yönelik bir analiz. Sanat Yazıları, 45, 493-506.

Bilir, S. (2013). Mekan tasarımında kavram geliştirme sürecine analitik bir yaklaşım (Publication No. 345224) [Master’s thesis, Hacettepe University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=_hsqzKF7Axm4K7mcviTOwg&no=jfzeVW2HFNNeSwZWwZnDLA

Bozdayı, A. M. (1996). İç mekan tasarımında kavram ve imaj. Anadolu Sanat Dergisi, 5, 17-22.

Brooker, G., & Stone, S. (2007). Basics interior architecture 01: Form and structure: The organisation of interior space. Bloomsbury Academic.

Buldaç, M. (2015). Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu kapsamında içmimarın hakları ve eserinin korunması (Publication No. 395195) [Master’s thesis, Anadolu University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=UaZJWNN_swVMPl__OfcZsw&no=gEmqZbpINaYkiBNMOSUYFg

Chamber of Interior Architects. (n.d.). Purpose. Retrieved April 28, 2024, from https://www.icmimarlarodasi.org.tr/tr/amac

Ching, F. D. K., & Binggeli, C. (2012). Interior design illustrated (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Council for Interior Design Qualification. (2019). Definition of interior design. https://www.cidq.org/_files/ugd/0784c1_16c47b1a47de44f7b8f3f87367e483ac.pdf

Coates, M., Brooker, G., & Stone, S. (2009). The visual dictionary of interior architecture and design. Bloomsbury Academic.

Cordan, Ö. (2017). İç mekan atmosferi. Yapı Dergisi, 452, 88-92.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0

Dedek, B. P. (2022). The women who professionalized interior design. Routledge.

Dodsworth, S., & Anderson, S. (2015). The fundamentals of interior design. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Gerring, J. (2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.

Gronberg, T. (1992). Décoration: Modernism’s ‘other’. Art History, 15(4), 547-552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1992.tb00556.x

Hasol, D. (2008). Ansiklopedik mimarlık sözlüğü (10th ed.). Yem Yayınları.

Havenhand, L. K. (2004). A view from the margin: Interior design. Design Issues, 20(4), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042311997

Industrial Property Code (2017, January 10). Resmî Gazete (No. 29944) https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/01/20170110-9.htm

International Federation of Interior Architects/Designers. (2011). IFI Interiors declaration. https://ifiworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IFI-Interiors-Declaration_Turkish.pdf

Kaçar, T. (1998). İçmimarlık ve ülkemizdeki yeri. Anadolu Sanat Dergisi, 8, 55-63.

Kaptan, B. B. (2001). İç mekanın niteliğini belirleyen ögelerin görsellik kazanmasını sağlayan oluşumlar. Anadolu Sanat Dergisi, 11, 113-130.

Koffka, K. (2013). Principles of Gestalt psychology. Taylor & Francis.

Martin, C. S. (1998). Professionalization: Architecture, interior decoration, and interior design as defined by Abbott [Unpublish master’s thesis]. University of Minnesota.

McCorquodale, C. (1988). The history of interior decoration (2nd ed.). Phaidon.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (Revised and expanded from Qualitative research and case study applications in education). Jossey-Bass.

Moorman, J. L. (2008). Interior design versus interior decoration: Evaluating the public’s perception of design television shows [Master’s thesis, Iowa State University]. Iowa State University Digital Repository. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/bdb584d9-41ac-444c-bc21-ddb517302b8b/content

Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. MIT Press.

Owen, C. L. (1993, July 23). Reflections on design: Process for change [Conference presentation]. Tenjin Barca Festival, Osaka, Japan. https://www.id.iit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Reflections-on-design-Owen_tenjin93.pdf

Özdamar, M. (2019). Türkiye’de içmimarlık eğitiminde değişen anlayışlar (paradigmalar) (Publication No. 545621) [Proficiency in Art, Hacettepe University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

Özsavaş, N. (2011). Türkiye'deki iç mimarlık eğitimi: Eğitim süreci, farklı eğitim programları ve uluslararası içmimarlık ölçütlerine göre programların değerlendirilmesi (Publication No. 296608) [Master’s thesis, Anadolu University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp

Pile, J. F. (1995). Interior design (4th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Piotrowski, C. M. (2001). Professional practice for interior designers. John Wiley & Sons.

Rice, C. (2007). The emergence of the interior: Architecture, modernity, domesticity (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Ramstedt, F. (2020). The interior design handbook. Penguin.

Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sparke, P. (2008). The modern interior revisited. Journal of Interior Design, 34(1), v-xii.

Suluk, C. (2003). Tasarım hukuku: Endüstriyel tasarım, marka, patent ve faydalı model karşılaştırmalı. Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Tanyaş, B. (2014). Nitel araştırma yöntemlerine giriş: Genel ilkeler ve psikolojideki uygulamaları. Eleştirel Psikoloji Bülteni, 5, 25-38.

Tate, A., & Smith, R. (1986). Interior design in the 20th century. Harper & Row.

Türk Dil Kurumu. (n.d.). Güncel Türkçe sözlük. Retrieved May 17, 2024, from https://sozluk.gov.tr

Türk Mühendis ve Mimar Odaları Birliği İçmimarlar Odası Serbest İçmimarlık Hizmetlerini Uygulama, Tescil ve Mesleki Denetim Yönetmeliği (2008, September 16). Resmî Gazete (No. 26999). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2008/09/20080916-3.htm

Travis, S., & Anderson, C. (2024). Interior design is not decoration and other ideas: Explore the world of interior design all around you in 100 illustrated entries. Laurence King Publishing.

Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.-a.). Design classification (Locarno). Retrieved April 7, 2022, from https://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/tasarim-locarno-siniflandirmasi

Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.-b.). Design search database. Retrieved January 1, 2024, from https://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/arastirma-yap?form=design&params=%257B%257D&run=true

Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. (2025). Design examination guide 2025. https://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/tasarim-bilgilendirme

Vanhee, S., Vandevoort, B., Floré, F., & De Vos, E. (2021). Beyond distinction-based narratives: Interior design's educational history as a knowledge base. Journal of Interior Design, 46(4), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12217

White, R. E., & Cooper, K. (2022). Qualitative research in the post-modern era: Critical approaches and selected methodologies (2nd ed.). Springer International Publishing.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.-a.). Locarno classification. Retrieved May 23, 2024, from https://www.wipo.int/en/web/classification-locarno

World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.-b.). List of goods in class order. Retrieved May 23, 2024, from https://locpub.wipo.int/enfr/

Wood, G., & Burbank, E. (2004). The art of interior decoration. Ulan Press.

Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case study research: Theory, methods and practice. Emerald Group Publishing.

Yıldırım, A. (1999). Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin temel özellikleri ve eğitim araştırmalarındaki yeri ve önemi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 23(112), 7-17.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Bezci, İsmail, & Elibol, G. C. (2026). The Use of Terminology Regarding the Protection of Interior Designs as “Designs” under Industrial Property Rights: An Evaluation through the Stakeholders’ Perspectives. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 14(1), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.365

Issue

Section

Articles