Mapping as a Tool for Revealing Collective Memory: The Case of Yeniköy, Istanbul

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.362

Keywords:

Collective urban memory, Intangible heritage, Places of memory, Yeniköy

Abstract

The significance of intangible values in the holistic preservation of architectural heritage has been widely recognized in the recent literature.  Since both individual and collective memory are intrinsically linked to place, memory studies have become indispensable tools in interpreting and understanding intangible values in architectural conservation. While historical sites and structures are valued as repositories of memory, they become subject to preservation over time. In this context, documenting memory elements and enhancing their visibility through mapping contributes to a more holistic preservation approach. This study conceptualizes "memory" as an "intangible" phenomenon, elucidates the scientific methods employed to investigate it, and offers recommendations for selecting appropriate methods in alignment with the future research objectives. To emphasize the importance of methodological selection and to observe the applicability of the tools, historical urban landscape of Yeniköy was selected as a case study, exploring whether historical places concurrently function as sites of memory. Consequently, the neighborhood's memory sites were identified, and thematic memory maps were generated. Briefly, the study analyzes methods for revealing collective memory visible within the framework of documenting the relationship between historical spaces and user memory while evaluating the role of its representation in architectural discourse within the overarching conservation process.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Neslihan Koçhan, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi

Neslihan Koçhan is an architect and a PhD candidate at Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, specializing in Heritage Conservation and Restoration. Having completed her master’s degree at the same institution, her academic research is complemented by extensive field experience as a project manager in restoration, with a particular focus on industrial heritage sites and palatial complexes. Her research interests encompass social memory, the intangible values of historic sites, and their integration into architectural conservation methodologies.

Koray Güler, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi

Koray Güler got his master’s and PhD degrees from the Istanbul Technical University Restoration Program. Güler was a guest researcher in Germany between 2015-2016 with a scholarship from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK). He has continued his academic studies at Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Department of Architecture since 2012. Currently, he has been working as an Associate Professor and gives lectures at both undergraduate and graduate levels. Güler continues his research on topics such as conservation theory, cultural landscapes, historical rural settlements, traditional construction techniques, wooden architectural heritage, intangible cultural heritage, and the preservation of modern architectural heritage. Güler is the Secretary General of ICOMOS Türkiye National Committee and a board member of Chamber of the Architects of Türkiye Istanbul Metropolitan Branch since 2024. He is also an expert member of the ICOMOS International Scientific Committee on Vernacular Architecture (CIAV).

References

Akpınar, İ. (2010). Rebuilding Istanbul: The 1937 Henri Prost plan. In E. Ergut & B. İmamoğlu (Eds.), Snapshots from 2000 II: Spaces/Times/People of the Republic. Proceedings of the Doctoral Research Symposium (pp. 107–124). Dipnot Yayınları & METU Press: Ankara. ISBN 978-975-9051-88-4.

Alderman, D. H. (2016). Place, naming and the interpretation of cultural landscapes. In The Routledge Research Companion to Heritage and Identity, 195–213. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613031-11

Artan, T. (1989). Architecture as a Theatre of Life: Profile of the Eighteenth Century Bosphorus (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Bastian, J. (2014). Locating archives within the landscape: Records, memory and place. Public History Review, 21, 45–59.

https://doi.org/10.5130/phrj.v21i0.3822

Bavilolyaei, B. F. (2018). Kullanıcı Katılımı Yaklaşımlarının Mimari Tasarım ve Uygulama Süreçleri Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi (Doctoral dissertation). Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science.

Bekar, İ., Konakoğlu, Z. N., & Bulut, B. (2021). Kentsel mekanlarda bilişsel haritalar ve kent donatıları: Trabzon Meydan Parkı örneği. Kent Akademisi, 14(4), 1100–1116. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.962892

Bilsel, F. C. (2015). Geç Osmanlı döneminden Cumhuriyet’e çağdaş şehir düşüncesi ve İstanbul planlaması. Antik Çağdan XXI. Yüzyıla Büyük İstanbul Tarihi (pp. 496–534). Istanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür AŞ & ISAM. https://doi.org/10.14744/tasarimkuram.2020.55477

Boğaziçi Kanunu. (1983). T.C. Resmî Gazete, 2960, 18229, 5(22), 970.

Duranay, N., Gürsel, E., & Ural, S. (1972). Cumhuriyetten bu yana İstanbul’un planlanması. Mimarlık, 7, 67–108.

Evliya Çelebi. (2008). Günümüz Türkçesiyle Evliya Çelebi Seyahatnamesi: İstanbul 1. Cilt 2. Kitap (S. A. Kahraman & Y. Dağlı, Eds.). YKY: Istanbul, Türkiye.

Grosvenor, E. (1895). Constantinople. Roberts Brothers: Boston, USA.

Halbwachs, M. ([1950] 2018). Kolektif Bellek. Çev.: Zuhal Karagöz, Pinhan Yayıncılık: İstanbul.

Hovannesyan, S. (1996). Payitaht İstanbul'un Tarihçesi (E. Hançer, Trans.). Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları: Istanbul, Türkiye.

İmar Kanunu. (1985). T.C. Resmî Gazete, 3194, 18749, 5(24), 378.

Janin, R. (1964). Constantinople Byzantine: Développement Urbain et Répertoire Topographique. Institut Français d’Études Byzantines: Paris, France.

Kaya, Ö. (2020). İmparatorluktan Cumhuriyete Azınlıklar. Kronik Kitap: Istanbul, Türkiye.

Koçhan, N. (2023). A Study on Revealing Collective Memory in The Historical Urban Landscape of Istanbul-Yeniköy (Master thesis). Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Institute of Science.

Köksoy Karpat, G. (2009). Tarihsel Alanlarda Sözlü Tarih Bilgisine Dayalı Kentsel Tasarım Kriterlerinin Oluşturulması; Kemeraltı Anafartalar Caddesi (İzmir) (Doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Science.

Kömürciyan, E. Ç. (1988). İstanbul Tarihi 17. Asırda İstanbul (H. D. Andreasyan, Trans.). Eren Yayıncılık: İstanbul, Türkiye.

Mills, A. ([2010] 2014). Hafızanın Sokakları: İstanbul'da Peyzaj, Hoşgörü ve Ulusal Kimlik. Çev: Cem Soydemir, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları: İstanbul, s: 27-110.

Nora, P. ([1989] 2018). Hafıza Mekanları. Çev: Mehmet Emin Özcan, Dost Kitabevi: Ankara.

Pardoe, J. (1838). The Beauties of The Bosphorus. Virtue and Company.

Ruskin, J. (1889). The Seven Lamps of Architecture (6th ed.). George Allen: Orpington, England.

Riegl, A. (2015). Modern Anıt Kültü. Daimon: Istanbul, Türkiye.

Salman, Y. (2004). Boğaziçi Tarihi Sit Alanının Yok Olma Süreci ve Kalan Sınırlı Değerlerin Korunma Olasılıkları (Doctoral dissertation). Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science.

Sözbir, C. (2011). İstanbul Yeniköy Zoğrafyon Rum Kız İlkokulu Restorasyon Projesi (Master’s thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science.

Taşçıoğlu, T. (1995). Yeniköy. Dünden Bugüne İstanbul Ansiklopedisi (Vol. 7, pp. 485–488). Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı: Istanbul, Türkiye.

Türker, O. (2004). Nihori'den Yeniköy'e Bir Boğaziçi Köyünün Hikayesi. Sel Yayıncılık: Istanbul, Türkiye.

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention

UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. https://whc.unesco.org/en/hul/

Ünal, G. (2022). John Ruskin ve yedi yol gösterici ışıktan "bellek". Amisos Journal, 7(12), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.48122/amisos.1035139

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Koçhan, N., & Güler, K. (2026). Mapping as a Tool for Revealing Collective Memory: The Case of Yeniköy, Istanbul. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 14(1), 286–312. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.362

Issue

Section

Articles