An Examination of The Use of Courtyard in Traditional Turkish Houses from The Perspective of Yarenlik and ICH: The Case of Kula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2026.357Keywords:
Yaren, Traditional Turkish house, Atrium, Kula, Architectural heritageAbstract
This study examines the courtyard space, a significant architectural element in traditional Kula houses, and analyzes the spatial requirements of the traditional Yarenlik ritual in relation to this space. Courtyard-based residential architecture in Anatolia is comprehensively analyzed with respect to climate, privacy, and typology. Additionally, the socio-spatial role of the courtyard is considered within the framework of the Yaren phenomenon and intangible cultural heritage (ICH). The spatial concept is grounded in Henri Lefebvre's definition, which characterizes space as a cyclical phenomenon produced by social life and generating social relations. Accordingly, the courtyard is interpreted not only as a product of climatic and formal considerations but also as a space shaped by social interaction. To substantiate the conceptual framework, a spatial analysis was conducted on three traditional courtyard houses from the 18th century in Kula, which exemplify courtyard-based ground floor plans. This spatial analysis examined the architectural reading, spatial usage ratios, mapping related to action-space-ritual, identification of communal seating areas, spatial identification of the spaces used by the Yaren during their activities (performance, food service, show, service), mobile or seated uses, group seating, central performance, hierarchical positioning, and the documented services of Yaren gatherings. The findings indicate that there is both spatial and action-related compatibility between the courtyard typology and ritual actions. Yarenlik is still being kept alive and sustained today, even outside of courtyard houses that are no longer in use. This research, which seeks to reveal the reciprocal relationship between built form and intangible values, contributes to the assertion that traditional courtyard houses are not only tangible architectural works but also the primary requirement for the realisation of social intangible cultural heritage values.
Metrics
References
Arslan, M., (2010). A Social lnstitute That Make Teaching Fun in Kula: Yaren, Motif Academy Journal of Folklore, 3(6), 2010, p.70-80.
Bayram, M., & Berrakçay, O. (2023). Music Practices in The Tradition of Partnership in The Context of Acculturation: Simav Case Study. Yegah Musicology Journal, 6(2), p. 317-343. https://doi.org/10.51576/ymd.1351887
Bekleyen, A. (2019). Present Interpretations of Courtyard Spatial Configuration in The Traditional Residential Architecture. Journal of TUBAV Science, 12 (1), 2019, p. 1-13.
Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. Oxford University Press.
Birkon, İ., & Köroğlu, A. (2025). Flow experience at yâren nights: The meeting point of tourism and cultural heritage. Tourism and Recreation, 7(1), p. 152-163. https://doi.org/10.53601/tourismandrecreation.1547689
Bozer, R. (1988). Kula Evleri. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
Coates, G., & Stone, S.(2011). Görsel İç Mimarlık Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Literatür Kitabevi, 2011.
Deniz, B., (1992). Manisa Yöresi Köy Ev Mimarisi. Journal of Art History, 6(1), p. 17-46.
Eren, H. (1999). Türk Dilinin Etimolojik Sözlüğü. Ankara: Bizim Büro Basım Evi, 1999.
Hasol, D. (2008). Ansiklopedik Mimarlık Sözlüğü. İstanbul: YEM, 2008.
Kartal, S. (2025). Traditional Conservation Places: The Example of Çankırı Yaren Room. PLANARCH- Design and Planning Research, 9(2), p. 439-448. https://doi.org/10.54864/planarch.1685166
Kirshenblatt-gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production1. Museum International, 56(1–2), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x
Kuban, D. (2017). Türk Ahşap Konut Mimarisi 17.- 19. yüzyıllar. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekânın Üretimi. İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
Oğuz, Ö. (2013). Intangible Cultural Heritage as a Term. Milli Folklor International Journal of Cultural Research, 25(100), p. 5-13.
Oliver, P. (2006). Dwellings: The vernacular house worldwide. Phaidon Press.
Smith, L. 2006 Uses of Heritage, Routledge, ISBN 9780415318310
Özkan, S. (2017). Sosyo-Kültürel Açıdan Geleneksel Toplumlarda Avlulu Ev Mimarisi. Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Kent-Mekan, s. 497-509. Ankara: TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Kadın Komisyonu.
Parlatır, Gözaydın, N., Zülfikar, H., Aksu, T., Türkmen, S., & Yılmaz, Y, (1988) Türk Dil Kurumu Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basım Evi.
Tezcan, M. (1990). Bir Yaygın Eğitim Kurumu Olarak Çankırı Yaran Örgütü, 2. Ulusal Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi 31 Mayıs- 2 Haziran 1990, 335-352.
Türker, A., & Çelik, İ. (2012). Alternative Proposals for Tourist Product Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage Elements. Yeni Fikir Dergisi, 4(9), 86-98. https://izlik.org/JA65SJ27BU
Unesco. (2003). Somut Olmayan Kültürel Mirasın Korunması Sözleşmesi. Paris: Unesco.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 