A Dramatistic Pentad-Based Conceptual Model Proposal for the Perception of Architectural Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.349Keywords:
rhetoric, Kenneth Burke, dramatistic pentad, architecture, Kolumba MuseumAbstract
The architectural object is a rhetorical experience producer that communicates with its user as a meaningful and multifaceted social construct. In this context, architecture should fundamentally be regarded as a matter of communication and discourse. In order to seek and ensure communication in architecture, it is essential to focus on language, and in order to talk about the existence of language, it is essential to focus on symbols, signs and indicators. Therefore, this study examines the perception of the architectural object at the intersection of rhetoric and architecture by associating Kenneth Burke's discussions on symbols with the symbolic aspect of all buildings environments. The originality of the study lies in its interdisciplinary approach to Burke’s method of analysis, providing a systematic reading practice for architectural objects. The absence of any other research in the literature that adapts Burke’s pentads to different inputs of the architectural object highlights the novelty of the proposed conceptual model. The pentadic-based conceptual model developed within the study, along with its application to the Kolumba Museum, specifically interprets the architectural object through Burke’s dramatistic pentad -act, agent, scene, agency, and purpose- to facilitate the interpretation of the symbolic meanings embedded in the architectural object and to contribute to the formation of individual judgments. Thus, a neo-critical understanding that considers the entire network of relationships constituting the architectural object can be made possible. Furthermore, the study highlights the adaptability of Kenneth Burke’s dramatistic pentads for analyzing the multifaceted nature of architectural objects. By allowing flexible interpretations through different pentadic ratios, the proposed model provides a systematic framework that accommodates diverse perspectives. This approach enables researchers to explore the relationship between architecture and its symbolic meanings in a structured yet open-ended manner. Ultimately, the study contributes to architectural discourse by encouraging subjective readings that acknowledge the dynamic interaction between the built environment and its users.
References
Alfaro Lera, J. A. (2013). La memoria del lugar: Kolumba Kunstmuseum. ZARCH (Zaragoza), 1, 306-319. https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/zarch/article/view/9393/7953
Appelt, S. (2012, February 7). Peter Zumthor. Langsames Licht. Retrieved January 5, 2024, from http://www.langsameslicht.com/html/dt/gespraeche_3.html
Arslan, S., & Uludağ, Z. (2020). Dilde mekânı (yeniden) kurgulamak: Yer isimleri, kolektif bellek ve ideoloji. İdealkent, 31 (11), 1422-1455. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.829867
Bowie, A. (2015, April 22-24). Exploring the rhetorical orientations of design trends: A Kenneth Burkean approach [Conference presentation]. 11th European Academy of Design Conference, Paris Descartes University Institute of Psychology, France.
Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 2(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511524
Buchanan, R. (1995). Rhetoric, humanism, and design. In Richard Buchanan and Victor Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 23-66). University of Chicago Press.
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. University of California Press.
Burke, K. (1973). The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action. University of California Press.
Burke, K. (with Joseph R. Gusfield). (1989). On symbols and society. The University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, K. K. (2006). Modern rhetoric. In Thomas O. Sloane (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. Retrieved February 16, 2024 from http://www.oxford-rhetoric.com/entry?entry=t223.e161
Cook, W. (2017, November 29). Cultural powerplant: How Düsseldorf shaped contemporary art and electronic music. BBC Arts. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/4T11fKdS6K34jNSW20x5BsJ/cultural-powerplant-how-dusseldorf-shaped-contemporary-art-and-electronic-music. Accessed 20 May 2024.
Çebi, M. S. (2008). Sembolik/ Retoriksel bir eylem olarak dil’in anlam inşasındaki aracılık işlevi. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 5(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.18094/si.68153
Dickinson, G., Ott, B. L., & Aoki, E. (2005). Memory and myth at the Buffalo Bill Museum. Western Journal of Communication, 69(2), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310500076684
Durmuş, S., & Gür, Ş. Ö. (2017). Mimarlığın metinsel temsilinde retorik inşa: Usûl-i Mi’mârî-i Osmanî. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 34(1), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2016.2.12
Foss, S. K. (1982). Rhetoric and the visual ımage: A resource unit. Communication Education, 31, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528209384659
Foss, S. K. (2018). Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice. Waveland Press.
Garver, E. (2017). Aristotle’s rhetoric in theory and practice. In Michael John MacDonald (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of rhetorical studies (pp. 133-141). Oxford University Press.
Guise, C. G. (2013). A nation in its prime: A pentadic study of Walt Disney World’s Main Street, USA [Master of Arts Dissertation]. Liberty University. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/256
Gutenschwager, G. (1996). Architecture in a changing world: The new rhetoric of form. Journal of Architectural Education, 49(4), 246-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/1425297.
Gürer, T. K., & Yücel, A. (2005). Bir paradigma olarak mimari temsilin incelenmesi. İTÜ Dergisi/A Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, 4(1), 84-96. http://itudergi.itu.edu.tr/index.php/itudergisi_a/article/view/944
Hasian, M., & Wood, R. (2010). Critical museology, (post) colonial communication, and the gradual mastering of traumatic pasts at the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA). Western Journal of Communication, 74 (2), 128-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570311003614484
Hattenhauer, D. (1984). The rhetoric of architecture: A semiotic approach. Communication Quarterly, 32(1), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378409369534
Hawhee, D., & Poole, M. (2019). Kenneth Burke at the MoMA: A viewer’s theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 105(4), 418-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2019.1657237
Henderson, G. (2020). Reading the signs with Kenneth Burke. UCD, 82, 60-80. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2020-9-60-80
Herrick, J. A. (2018). The history and theory of rhetoric: An introduction. Routledge: New York.
Ivanainen, Z. V. (2015). Astana’s architecture as a representation of the new Kazakhstan: Politikal reading of Astana’s built environment [Master’s Thesis]. University of Jyväskylä. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/46346
Jackson, C. (2013). The use of rhetoric in public relations: Kenneth Burke’s theory of identification and consubstantiality [Master of Arts dissertation]. Kennesaw State University. Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects.
Karaaslan, S. (2022). Geç-kapitalizmin estetik araçları olarak reklam ve sanat: neolibralizmin söylem inşasında sanatın rolü üzerine bir analiz [Doctoral dissertation]. Ankara University.
Kirkbride, R. (2017). Rhetoric and architecture. In Michael John MacDonald (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of rhetorical studies (pp. 505-522). Oxford University Press.
Kocabaş, O. (2019). İletişim çalışmalarına retoriksel bir perspektif: Dramatizasyon kuramı ve Kenneth Burke. In Gülcan Şener & Serdar Yıldız (Eds.), İletişim Araştırmalarında Farklı Bakış Açıları (pp. 295-317). Detay Yayıncılık.
Kolumba Art Museum of Archdiocese of Cologne Official Web Site, Retrieved January 7, 2024, from https://kolumba.de/?language=eng&cat_select=1&category=14&artikle=58&preview=
Köklüdağ, M. (2016). Retorik. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 202-206.
McCarron, G. (2021). Lecture 5: Kenneth Burke: Rhetoric in the sphere of motives. Scholarly and Research Communication, 12 (1), 1-32. https://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/371/721
McConnell, N. (2020, May). Letter from Cologne and Neuss. Art Monthly, 436, 42-43. https://www.artmonthly.co.uk/magazine/site/issue/may-2020
McCormack, K. C. (2014). Ethos, pathos, and logos: The benefits of aristotelian rhetoric in the courtroom. Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 7(1), 131-155. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_jurisprudence/vol7/iss1/9
Navarro Martinez, V. (2010). El Museo Kolumba: Elogio de la pieza ausente. Revista Proyecto, Progreso, Arquitectura, 1, 132-143. https://doi.org/10.12795/ppa.2010.i1.11
Niğdeli, Z. F., & Sayıl Onaran, B. (2024). Palimpsest mekânlar için analitik bir inceleme aracı önerisi: St. Pierre Han örneği. Sanat Yazıları, 50, 82-103. https://doi.org/10.61742/sanatyazilari.1378397
Oxford Learner’s Dictionary (n.d.). Palimpsest. In oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com dictionary. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/palimpsest?q=palimpsest
Özel, M. K. (2017). Zumthor mimarlığında kutu fikri. Mimarlık Dergisi, 398, 54-59.http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=412.
Özer, S. (2006). Hadislerin anlaşılmasında bir yöntem olarak retorik analiz: Vadettikleri ve sınırlılıkları. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 6(2), 233-258. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/daad/issue/4511/62107
Pallasmaa, J.(2016). Tenin gözleri: mimarlık ve duyular (A. U. Kılıç, Trans.). Yapı-Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.
Pallasmaa, J. (2021). Mekân, yer ve atmosfer: varlık deneyiminde çevre algısı. In M.Taha Tunç, Sümeyye Yıldız (Eds.), Mimarlar neden Bachelard okur? (pp. 129-156). Ketebe Yayınları.
Richards, I. A. (2004). Priciples of literary criticism. Routledge.
Rountree, C., & Rountree, J. (2015). Burke’s pentad as a guide for symbol-using citizens. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(4), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9436-1
Schraufnagel, W. (2021). Expression and sympathy in Walter Pater, Oscar Wilde, and Kenneth Burke. Rhetoric Review, 40(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2020.1841457
Shearer, A. W. (2004). Applying Burke’s dramatic pentad to scenarios. Futures, 36, 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2004.01.009
Simonson, P. (2010). The street of Laredo. Mercurian rhetoric and the Obama campaign. Western Journal of Communication, 74(1), 94-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310903466045
Smudde, P. M. (2004). Implications on the practice and study of Kenneth Burke’s idea of a “public relations counsel with a heart.” Communication Quarterly, 52(4), 420 432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370210
Spier, S. (2001). Place, authorship and the concrete: Three conversations with Peter Zumthor. arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, 5(1), 15-36.
Tobin, C., Murphy-Lawless, J., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Childbirth in exile: Asylum seeking women's experience of child birth in Ireland. Midwifery, 30(7), 831-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.012
Toros, S. (2020). Retorik, ikna ve tasarım jürisi. Yedi, 23, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.17484/yedi.598114
Ursprung, P. (n.d.). Peter Zumthor of Switzerland Becomes the 2009 Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate. The Pritzker Architecture Prize Official Web Site. Retrieved February 10, 2024, from https://www.pritzkerprize.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/2009_PhilipUrpsrungEssay.pdf
Ünlü, Ç. Y. (2018). Retorikte alan temelli dönüş ve katılımcı eleştirel retorik. Moment: Hacettepe Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Kültürel Çalışmalar Dergisi, 5(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.17572/mj2018.1.5778
Vasagar, J. (2001, October 20). Cologne Museum to get 774 Picassos. The Guardian. Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/26/arts.highereducation
Wun-Ming Wat, T. (2014). Moments of spiritual engagement in architecture: A search for awareness of life and architecture [Master of Arts dissertation]. University of Waterloo. UWSpace.
Zappen, J. P. (2009). Kenneth Burke on dialectical-rhetorical transcendence. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 42(3), 279–301. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25655358
Zumthor, P. (1998). Thinking architecture. Birkhäuser.
Zumthor, P. (2006). Architektur denken. Birkhäuser.
Zurutuza-Muñoz, C. (2014). Dramatistic theory: A Burkeian approach to the 2004 Madrid terrorist attaks. In Robert S. Fortner, P. Mark Fackler (Eds.), The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory (pp. 154-171). Wiley Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 