Adaptation of Interior Design Course to Distance Education During Covid 19 Pandemic Period

Authors

  • esra orhan yılmaz artvin çoruh üniversity
  • Emine Esen Gençaydın

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.348

Keywords:

Design studio, Distance learning, Tiny house, Pandemic, Interior architecture education

Abstract

In a period when the changing living conditions with the Covid-19 pandemic are effective in all areas of life, this research is an example that investigates how the second-year undergraduate Interior Design I applied course, which is carried out in Hacettepe University (HU), Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design in formal education, can be efficiently adapted to distance education and develops methods on this subject. A mixed research method combining qualitative and quantitative approaches was used to analyse students’ adaptation, motivation and project outcomes. In the research, it is aimed that the Interior Design I course, which was conducted online in the early period of the pandemic, will contribute to the related courses in case of a transition to distance education system due to different reasons. The course was divided into five different sections. Each section was taught by a different lecturer and a teaching assistant. In addition to the fact that the topics of all sections were the same, the requirements, evaluation criteria and exam dates were designed simultaneously. The research was conducted through the students (16) who chose this course in Branch II and their project studies. Various methods were developed to ensure the efficiency achieved in formal education. In line with the opinions, feedbacks and project outputs of the students who are the subjects of this process, suggestions for the adaptation of distance education to interior design courses have been developed. The findings revealed that students successfully adapted to online design education and achieved creative results comparable to face-to-face learning. The study focused on the adaptation process of traditional hand drawing to the digital environment applied in the distance education period. This study provides insights that can guide the development of flexible and sustainable design education models for future crisis conditions.

References

Artsteps. (2025). Interior Design I Digital Exhibition. Retrieved November 12, 2025, from https://www.artsteps.com/view/6037bafcd305c037da5460bc

Buldan, E. (2021). Situated Learning in Online Architectural Studio Education. Journal of Design Studio, 3(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.930642

Cihanger Medeiros Ribeiro, D., (2022). Teaching basic design online during the Covid-19 pandemic: An evaluation of the conventional and innovative pedagogies. Megaron, 17(4), 589–601.

Council of Higher Education, (2020). COVID-19 information note. https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR,80604/bakan-koca-turkiyenin-kovid-19la-1-yillik-mucadele-surecini-degerlendirdi.html

Creswell, J. W. (2021). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş (M. Sözbilir, Trans.). Pegem Akademi.

Daniel, S. J., (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3

Ergün, M. (2015). Eğitim felsefesi. Pegem Yayınları.

Hacettepe Üniversitesi. (2025). İç mimarlık ve çevre tasarımı bölümü bilgi paketi. Retrieved March 8, 2025, form https://bilsis.hacettepe.edu.tr/oibs/bologna/index.aspx

Hammersley, M. (1996). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: Paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In J. T. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 159-174), British Psychological Society Books.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Holden, G., & Garner, S. (2005, September 14-15). E-learning in the development of design skills and knowledge. Paper presented at the Designs on eLearning Conference, London, UK.

Karip, E. (2020). COVID-19: Okulların kapatılması ve sonrası. Retrieved March 8, 2025, from https://tedmem.org/yazilar-detay/covid-19-okullarin-kapatilmasi-ve-sonrasi

Maxcy, S. J. (2003), Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: the search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie, (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral science (pp. 51-89) Sage.

Öztürk, A. (2016). Tasarım eğitiminde yeni yaklaşımlar: Çevrimiçi tamamen uzaktan eğitim. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 120–135.

Soygeniş, S. (2006). Mimarlık düşünmek düşlemek. YEM Yayınları.

Su C-Y. & Guo Y., (2021). Factors impacting university students' online learning experiences during the COVID-19 epidemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37, 1578–1590. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12555

Süner-Pla-Cerdà, S., Öztürk, E. ve Ünlü, C.E., (2025). Towards an integrative model of blended design studios: A multiple case study across architecture, design and planning education. Education and Information Technologies, 30 , 2005–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12873-y

Şuta, O. (2022). Covid 19 Pandemisi ile değişen mimari tasarım eğitiminde öğrenci deneyimleri. Kent Akademisi, 15(4), 1547-1574. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1129614

Tafahomi, R. (2022). Educational behavior of the students in the design studios during the pandemic time. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 8(4), 352-362. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1164545

Tarakçı Eren, E., Yılmaz, S. & Düzenli, T. (2023). The attitudes of landscape architecture students towards distance and face-to-face education methods and the effects of the two education methods on academic achievement in the project course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, 1221–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09771-0

UNESCO. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse

Yamamoto, G. T., & Altun, D. (2020). Coronavirüs ve çevrimiçi (online) eğitimin önlenemeyen yükselişi. Journal of University Research, 3(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.26701/uad.711110

Yang, M. Y., You, M., & Chen, F. C. (2005). Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance. Design Studies, 26(2), 155–189.

Yıldırım, T., Özen, A., & İnan, N. (2010). Uzaktan mimari tasarım eğitiminde internet teknolojilerinin kullanımı. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1(2), 37-45.

Youtube. (2025). Tiny House Exhibition (Video). Retrieved November 12, 2025, from https://youtu.be/PPpF7hBZps4

Published

31-12-2025

How to Cite

orhan yılmaz, esra, & Gençaydın, E. E. (2025). Adaptation of Interior Design Course to Distance Education During Covid 19 Pandemic Period . ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 13(2), 850–872. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.348

Issue

Section

Articles