An Iconic Representation of Modern Architecture from Construction to Destruction: Tercuman Newspaper Building

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.329

Keywords:

Collective memory, Destruction, Modern architectural heritage, Tercüman Newspaper Building

Abstract

The study focuses on the Tercüman Newspaper Building, which has recently drawn attention following its demolition. The Tercüman Newspaper Building was built in 1974 based on a project selected through a competition organized by Kemal Ilıcak. The architects of the building, Günay Çilingiroğlu and Muhlis Tunca, were influential figures in shaping the modern architectural practices of the period. In addition to the architects' design approach and education, Kemal Ilıcak's vision played a key role in shaping the building's architecture. The Tercüman Newspaper Building, one of the first examples of New Brutalism in Türkiye in the 1970s, stood out as a modern heritage structure that gained attention for its innovative structural analysis. Over its 49-year existence, the building was widely discussed both for its architectural design and its symbolic value. This study aims to examine the building's functional transformations from its construction to its demolition and contribute to its role in social memory. The first stage of the study, structured in four phases, establishes the theoretical framework and discusses demolition and conservation actions in the context of modern architecture. The second stage provides details on the plan, structure, and façade characteristics of the building, along with an analysis of its symbolic value. The third stage examines the functional changes the newspaper building underwent after changing ownership and the process leading to its demolition, also exploring the public reactions to the demolition. The fourth and final stage emphasizes that modern heritage buildings, which reflect the architectural practices and socio-cultural life of a period and should be preserved for future generations through a robust conservation mindset.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Zeynep Yanılmaz, Karadeniz Technical University

Zeynep YANILMAZ is an architect and interior architect. She completed her undergraduate and graduate studies at the Faculty of Architecture, Karadeniz Technical University, in 2013 and 2020, respectively. She has been a research assistant at the Department of Interior Architecture at Karadeniz Technical University since 2020. Her research interests include sustainability, energy-efficient design, educational spaces and modern architecture. She is currently pursuing her PhD studies at Karadeniz Technical University.

References

Akcan, E. (2010). Asilik sonrası mimarlık. In İ. Akpınar (Ed.), Osmanlı Başkentinden Küreselleşen İstanbul’a: Mimarlık ve Kent, 1910-2010, (pp.135-147). İstanbul: Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi

Artun, A. (2011). Çağdaş sanatın örgütlenmesi: Estetik modernizmin tasfiyesi. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

Bekar, İ., Kutlu, İ., & Ergün, R. (2024). “Importance performance analysis for sustainability of reused historical building: Mardin Sabanci City Museum and art gallery”. Open House International, 49(3), 550-573. doi: 10.1108/OHI-04-2023-0080

Berman, M. (1999). Katı olan her şey buharlaşıyor. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

Çetken, P. (2011). “Kentin Hafızasında Bir Travma: Sulukule Yıkımı”, Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul.

Elmalı Şen, D., Midilli Sarı, R., Sağsöz, A. and Al, S. (2014). 1960-80 Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türk Mimarlığı. Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(10), 541-556. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7590

Erkol, İ. (2016). “Türkiye Mimarlığı’nda Modernizmin Revizyonları (1960-1980)”. PhD Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul.

Ganiç, K. (2016). “Kentsel Yapıtlar Üzerinden Bir Mekânsal Bellek Okuması: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi (AKM)”, Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul.

Gül, M. (2017). Architecture and the Turkish city: An urban history of İstanbul since the Ottomans. London: I. B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.

Halbwachs, M. (2016). Hafızanın toplumsal çerçeveleri. (B. Uçar, Çev.). İstanbul: Heretik Yayınları.

Kaymak, S. (2019). “Türkiye’de Avangart Modernizmin Bir Örneği Olarak Tercüman Gazetesi Binası”, Master Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul.

Nuhoğlu, T. (2021). Tercüman Gazetesi Yapısı. Betonart, 71.

Russell, N. (2006). Collective memory before and after Halbwachs. The French Review, 79(4), 792- 804.

Sey, Y. (1998). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Türkiye’de Mimarlık ve Yapı Üretimi. In 75 Yılda Değişen Kent ve Mimarlık (pp.25-39). İstanbul: TC İş Bankası ve Tarih Vakfı Ortak Yayınları.

Tanyeli, U. (1998). Yıkarak Yapmak. İstanbul: Türkiye Tarih Vakfı.

Tekeli, İ. (2007). Türkiye’de Mimarlığın Gelişiminin Toplumsal Bağlamı. In R. Holod, A. Evin & S., Özkan (Eds.), Modern Türk Mimarlığı 1900-1980 (pp.15-36). Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası.

Tercüman Gazetesi, 26 Ekim 1975, pp.2.

TMMOB Mimarlar Odası İstanbul Büyükkent Şubesi, 13 Aralık 2023. https://www.mimarist.org/ikonik-bir-yapi-olan-tercuman-gazetesi-binasinin-yikimini-kiniyoruz/

Tuluk, Ö. İ. (2009). Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlık Dergileri ve Mimarlık Tarihi Yazıları Bibliyografyası. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, 7(13), 485-556.

URL-1, https://www.toyayapi.com/toya-plaza/ (Accessed date: 01/05/2024)

URL-2, https://www.herumutortakarar.com/tercuman-binasi/#:~:text=2019'da%20Do%C4%9Fan%20Hasol%20%E2%80%9CTerc%C3%BCman,Tescilli%20yap%C4%B1lara%20ilan%20vb.%20konulamaz. (Accessed date: 17/05/2024)

URL-3, https://x.com/DoganHasol/status/1091315358332583937/photo/1 (Accessed date: 17/05/2024)

URL-4, https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/zeytinburnundaki-49-yillik-eski-tercuman-gazetesi-binasi-yikildi,PnMUdDU-WECxLK_SVPxAuQ (Accessed date: 17/05/2024)

Vanlı, Ş. (2002). Son 30 Yıl Türk Mimarlığının Önemli Saydığım Birkaç Yanı. Yapı, 250, 94-103.

Vanlı, Ş. (2006). Günay Çilingiroğlu’nun arayışları. In Bilinmek İstenmeyen 20. Yüzyıl Türk Mimarlığı Eleştirel Bakış (pp. 310-340). Ankara: Şevki Vanlı Mimarlık Vakfı.

Vurucular Kesimci, E. & Ciravoğlu, A. (2024). The Transfer of Spatial Memory with Collective Practices Among the Generations of Lausanne Exchangees in Bursa. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 12 (1), 95-124. DOI: 10.15320/ICONARP.2024.277

Yanılmaz, Z. & Yalçınkaya, Ş. (2022). Yok Olmuş Bir Yapının Bellekteki Yeri: Trabzon Opera Binası, Inonu University Journal of Art and Design, 12(25), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.16950/iujad.1082116

Yücel, A. (1985). Tercüman Gazetesi Binası: Mimarlıkta Biçim, Simge ve İşlev Üzerine. Mimarlık, 85(4), 29-32.

Yücel, A. (2007). Çoğulculuk İş Başında: Türkiye’nin Bugünkü Mimarlık Manzarası. In R. Holod, A. Evin & S., Özkan (Eds.), Modern Türk Mimarlığı 1900-1980 (pp. 125-156). Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası.

Zürcher, E. J. (2008). Modernleşen Türkiye’nin Tarihi (22. Basım). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Yanılmaz, Z. (2025). An Iconic Representation of Modern Architecture from Construction to Destruction: Tercuman Newspaper Building. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 13(1), 382–409. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.329

Issue

Section

Articles