A Mamdani-Based Fuzzy Logic Model for Evaluating the Design Quality of Urban Squares
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.325Keywords:
Fuzzy logic, Public space, Urban squareAbstract
Urban squares are essential elements defining public interactions, cultural manifestations, and urban social characteristics. The spaces function as central meeting areas where citizens participate in civic duties, connect and serve to maintain urban design unity. The evaluation process of design quality proves challenging because it combines the personal interpretation of many complex variables, which standard assessment techniques struggle to measure. The researchers present a Mamdani-based fuzzy logic model that evaluates urban square design quality through eight core parameters: imageability, meaning, legibility, time, enclosure, dominance, diversity, and comfort. Fuzzy logic is an approximation system that converts evaluative statements based on linguistic expressions into numerical arrangements, which excel at interpreting multi-faceted urban design evaluations. The model underwent calibration through evaluations from 1,044 architecture professionals, planners, and landscape architects, and it was used to analyze 20 internationally recognized urban squares with various spatial designs across different cultural settings. The quantitative model demonstrated its accuracy by matching expert-aggregated scores when measured against predictions, with a precision of ±1.5% pin predicting outcomes. All examined variables confirmed that enclosure and comfort are the key factors influencing perceptions of design quality. The model provides practical applications for urban planners, decision-makers, and educators through its ability to create a standardized evaluation process for current and future urban interventions. The framework offers a distinctive approach that integrates design thinking-oriented methods with evaluative measures, rendering it practical for contemporary urban design practice.
Metrics
References
Abacı, F. C. (2018). Analyses Of Four Urban Squares in Izmir According To The Leading Urban Design Literature [Master, İzmir Institute of Technology]. İzmir.
Acar, H., Yavuz, A., Eroğlu, E., Acar, C., Sancar, C., & Değermenci, A. S. (2021). Analysis of activity, space and user relations in urban squares. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(9), 1466-1485.
Alberti, L. B. (1986). The Ten Books of Architecture: The 1755 Leoni Edition. E.P. Dutton.
Alexander, C. (1987). A New Theory of Urban Design. Oxford University Press. http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=STCoRQzgDZcC
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977a). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction (Center for Environmental Structure Series).
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977b). Pattern languages. Center for Environmental Structure, 2.
Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 808-836.
Alkan Bala, H., & Üstünbaş, T. (2014). Modelling the Urban Interface by Using Fuzzy Logic. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, Vol.02(No.01), 59-73, Article 44262. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbcpr.2014.21006
Alkan Bala, H., & Üstüntaş, T. (2014). Modelling the urban interface by using fuzzy logic. Journal of Building Construction and Planning Research, 2(01), 59.
Altay, E. E., Batman, Z. P., & Acaray, S. C. (2023). Urban Squares within the Framework of Urban Design: Kadıköy Square, Turkey. Landscape Architecture and Art, 22(22), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.22.02
Altınçekiç, S., & Kart, N. (2000). Kentsel tasarım sürecinde meydanlar. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 50(2), 111-120.
Appleyard, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and behavior.
Ashihara, Y. (1981). Exterior design in architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Baykal, N., & Beyan, T. (2004). Bulanık mantık ilke ve temelleri. Bıçaklar Kitabevi.
Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S., & Smith, G. (1985). Responsive environments: a manual for designers. Routledge.
Bostanci, S. H., & Ocakçi, M. (2009). Kent siluetlerine ilişkin tasarım niteliklerinin, entropi yaklaşımı ile değerlendirilmesi. ITU Journal Series A: Architecture, Planning, Design, 8(2).
Bostanci, S. H., & Ocakçi, M. (2011). Innovative Approach to Aesthetic Evaluation Based on Entropy. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 705-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548473
Çakmaklı, D. (1992). Bina-kentsel çevre ilişkisi. Yıldız Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places-urban spaces. Architectural Press.
Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2010). Public places, urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design (Second Edition ed.). Architectural Press, Elsevier.
Carmona, M. (2021). Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge.
Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Ching, F. D. (1979). Architecture: Form, space, and order. Wiley.
Collins, G. R., & Collins, C. C. (2006). Camillo Sitte: The Birth of Modern City Planning. Dover. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=pLRgcXZgN-YC
Cullen, G. (1971). Concise Townscape. Taylor & Francis. http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=yANJ5tXQOyIC
Çınar, H. S., & Çermikli, B. (2018). Reading Urban Space in Istanbul Historical Peninsula. In The Most Recent Studies in Science and Art (pp. 325–336). Gece Publishing House.
Çınar, H. S., & Çermikli, B. (2019). Point Density Analysis with Cognitive Mapping Technique: Istanbul-Historical City Center. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(7), 5359–5367.
Çolakkadıoğlu, D., & Büyüköztürk, E. (2024). A Methodological Approach to Urban Squares Suitability Analysis: The Case of Osmaniye City Center. Online Journal of Art & Design, 12(2).
Damayanti, R., & Kossak, F. (2016). Extending Kevin Lynch’s concept of imageability in third space reading; case study of Kampungs, Surabaya–Indonesia [Ph D Thesis, Petra Christian University]. Indonesia.
De Lotto, R., & Sturla, S. (2017). Measure and proportion as keyword for qualitative town squares. The Journal of Public Space, 2(1), 69-80.
Dee, C. (2004). Form and fabric in landscape architecture: a visual introduction. Taylor & Francis.
DETR/CABE. (2000). By Design: Urban Design in the Planning System: Towards Better Practice. Thomas Telford.
Ervural, B. Ç., Sarı, İ. U., & Koçyiğit, B. (2018). Kural tabanlı bulanık yaklaşımla talep tahmini ve hızlı tüketim sektöründe bir uygulama. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(1), 83-93.
Essex, P. D. (1973). A design guide for residential areas: County Council of Essex [Planning Department]. E. P. Department.
Ewing, R., & Clemente, O. (2013a). Measuring Urban Design.
Ewing, R., & Clemente, O. (2013b). Measuring Urban Design. Island Press.
Ewing, R., & Clemente, O. (2013c). Measuring Urban Design Metrics for Livable Places. Island Press.
Ferdous, F. (2013). Examining the Relationship Between Key Visual Characteristics of Urban Plazas and Aesthetic Response. SAGE Open, 3(2), 2158244013485581.
Francis, M. (2003). Urban open space: Designing for user needs (Vol. 3). Island Press.
French, J. S. (1978a). Urban space.
French, J. S. (1978b). Urban space: A brief history of the city square. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Gehl, J. (1968). Mennesker til fods. Arkitektens Forlag.
Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings:using public space. Island Press.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space. Island Press.
Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013). How to study public life (Vol. 2). Springer.
Gibberd, F. (1959). Town Design. Praeger.
Gold, S. M. (1980). Recreation Planning and Design. McGraw Hill Book Company.
Grammel, U., Hörmann, E., & Trieb, M. (1977). Grundlagen des stadtgestalterischen Entwerfens : Literaturanalyse von Autoren aus verschiedenen Jahrhunderten, entstanden in einem Forschungsseminar der Projektgruppe Stadtgestaltung (1. Aufl. ed.). Stuttgart.
Jacobs, A., & Appleyard, D. (1987). Toward an urban design manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(1), 112-120.
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. Praeger.
Köseoğlu, E., & Erinsel Önder, D. (2010). Mekansal okunabilirlik kavramının çözümlenmesi.
Kostof, S. (1992). The City Shaped: The Elements of Urban Form Through History.
Kostof, S., Castillo, G., & Tobias, R. (1992). The city assembled : the elements of urban form through history ; [346 illustrations, 40 in color]. Little, Brown.
Krier, R. (1979). Urban Space. Rizzoli International Publications, Incorporated. http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=uqFtQgAACAAJ
Lamit, H. (2004). Redefining landmarks. Jurnal Alam Bina, 6(1), 66-76.
Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory: the role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Lang, J., & Marshall, N. (2016). Urban Squares as Places, Links and Displays: Successes and Failures. Routledge.
Lefebvre, H., & Régulier, C. (2004). Attempt at the rhythmanalysis of Mediterranean cities. In Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life (pp. 85-100). Continuum.
Lovene, M., Smith, N. B., & Seresinhe, C. I. (2019). Of Streets and Squares: Which public places do people want to be in and why? Cadogan.
Li, X., Kozlowski, M., Salih, S. A., & Ismail, S. B. (2024). Evaluating the vitality of urban public spaces: perspectives on crowd activity and built environment. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city (Vol. 1). MIT press.
Lynch, K. (1972). What time is this place? The MIT Press.
Lynch, K. (1984). Good City Form. MIT press.
Marcus, C. C., & Francis, C. (1997). People places: design guidlines for urban open space. John Wiley & Sons.
Matlab. (2014). What is Fuzzy Logic. Mathworks. Retrieved January from http://www.mathworks.com/help/fuzzy/what-is-fuzzy-logic.html?searchHighlight=what%20is%20fuzzy
Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism, 1(3), 217-245.
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of urban design, 19(1), 53-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
Memlük, M. Z. (2013). Designing urban squares. In Advances in Landscape Architecture. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/55826
Moughtin, J. C. (2003). Urban design: street and square (Third ed.). Architectural Press.
Nasar, J. L. (1998). The evaluative image of the city. Sage.
Ödük, M. N. (2019). Bulanık Mantık Yöntemi ve Uygulamaları. İksad Publishing House.
Oktay, D. (2007). Kentsel Kimlik ve Canlılık Bağlamında Meydanlar: Kuzey Kıbrıs’ ta Bir Meydana Bakış. Mimarlık Dergisi, 334.
Önder, S., & Aklanoğlu, F. (2002). Kentsel Açık Mekân Olarak Meydanların İrdelenmesi. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 16(29), 96-106.
Özdemir, O., & Kalınkara, Y. (2020). Bulanık mantık: 2000-2020 yılları arası tez ve makale çalışmalarına yönelik bir içerik analizi. Acta Infologica, 4(2), 155-174.
Özer, M. N., & Ayten, M. A. (2005). Kamusal Odak Olarak Kent Meydanları. Planlama Dergisi(33), 96-103.
Özyılmaz Küçükyagcı, P. (2019). Bulanık Mantık Yönteminin Kentsel Alan Çalışmalarında Kullanımı. Urban Academy, 12(2), 299–308.
Özyılmaz Küçükyağcı, P. (2020). Kent meydanlarının mekân tasarımı niteliklerinin bulanık mantık ile değerlendirilmesi. İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Ensitüsü Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
PPS. (2000). How to turn a place around: a handbook for creating successful public spaces. Project for Public Spaces Incorporated.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of environmental psychology, 3(1), 57-83.
Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design. Pergamon Press New York.
Reis, A., Portella, A., Bennett, J., & Lay, M. (2003, 17-19 June). Accessibility and security: Syntactic and perceptual analysis in two low-income housing 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, UK.
Relph, E. C. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion Limited. http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=ml0FAQAAIAAJ
Romano, M. (2004). Costruire le citta. Skira.
Samavati, S., & Ranjbar, E. (2017). The Effect of Physical Stimuli on Citizens' Happiness in Urban Environments: The Case of the Pedestrian Area of the Historical Part of Tehran. Journal of Urban Design and Mental Health(2).
Sepe, M. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic and public spaces: improving quality and flexibility for healthier places. Urban design international, 26(2), 159.
Shokouhi, M. (2003). Legible cities: The role of visual clues and pathway configuration in legibility of cities. Proceedings of 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London,
Sitte, C. (1889). City planning according to artistic principles: Translation (Translation ed.). Rizzoli. (Der Stadte-Bau nach seinen künstlerischen Grundsatzen 1889)
Sitte, C. (1986). City planning according to artistic principles. Rizzoli.
Stamps, A. E. (2005). Elongation and Enclosure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101(1), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.101.1.303-308
Stevens, Q. (2007). The ludic city: exploring the potential of public spaces. Routledge.
Stubben, J. (1924). Der städtbau [La construction des villes]. Leipzig: JM Gebhardt’s Verlag.
Şen, Z. (2009). Bulanık Mantık İlkeleri ve Modelleme (Mühendislik ve Sosyal Bilimler) (Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı ed.). Su Vakfı Yayınları.
Terzi, F., Akay, M., Okumuş, D. E., & Gökçe, P. (2019). Re-coding The Characteristics of Public Spaces: The Case of İstanbul. Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7(2), 487-512.
Tibet, F. A. (2024). Kent Meydanlarındaki Dokuların Okunabilirlik ve Karmaşıklık Niteliklerine Göre İncelenmesi: Kavramsal Bir Model Önerisi. International Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 10(66), 120–138.
Tlauka, M., & Wilson, P. N. (1994). The effect of landmarks on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology.
Tönük, S., & Barkul, Ö. (1999). Piazza, Plaza, Square, Platz, Praça, Meidan, Meydan. Ege Mimarlık, 2, 34-38.
Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: theories of urban design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Tunnard, C., & Pushkarev, B. (1963). Man-Made America: Chaos or Control? Yale University Press.
Vitruvius, M. P. (1960a). The ten books on architecture, translated by morris hicky morgan (Vol. Book V). Dover Publications.
Vitruvius, M. P. (1960b). The ten books on architecture, translated by morris hicky morgan. Book V(Chapter I).
Wang, P. (2002). Systematic Construction of Urban Public Space. Southeast University Press.
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces.
Wolfrum, S. (2014). Squares: Urban Spaces in Europe. Birkhäuser.
Yıldız, B. & Çağdaş, G. (2020). Fuzzy logic in agent-based modeling of user movement in urban space: Definition and application to a case study of a square. Building and Environment, 169.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.
Zawidzki, M. (2016). Evaluation of the Qual
ity of an Urban Square. In Discrete Optimization in Architecture (pp. 35-50). Springer.
Zucker, P. (1959a). Town and Square From The Agora To The Village Green.
Zucker, P. (1959b). Town and Square From The Agora To The Village Green. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 19(1), 103-104.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 