Components of Design Thinking in Spatial Design Education and a Model Proposal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.331Keywords:
Components of design thinking, Design education, Design process, Design thinking, Spatial design educationAbstract
Design thinking, defined in its simplest form as a creative problem-solving process, is interpreted in various ways in the literature, with differing models and components. This study, motivated by the need to identify gaps in existing approaches and to clarify the concept of design thinking, aims to define its key components within the context of spatial design education. To achieve this objective, the study employed qualitative research methods. To collect data, the study utilized both a literature review and content analysis techniques. By categorizing the collected data, it was concluded that design thinking consists of three fundamental components: cognitive-rational, emotional-intuitive, and practical. These components were elaborated upon with subcategories based on literature data, and a comprehensive model proposal for use in space design education was developed. The proposal put forward in this study is significant in clarifying the concept of design thinking and its constituent components. On the other hand, the potential of the proposed model to offer guiding alternatives for the problem-solving process in design studios at various levels and to make design thinking more explicit can be attributed to the pedagogical contributions of this study. From a practical perspective, the study is considered to have the potential to directly inform practice by proposing concrete and applicable steps that can be implemented within the design process. For future research based on this study, it is recommended that the potential contributions of the proposed model be explored through its application in actual design processes. Furthermore, expanding the theoretical scope by questioning different approaches to the components of design thinking is also suggested.
References
Akış, T. (2008, June 5-7). The dance of science and design in first year studio: Contributions of Bilgi Denel to basic design in Turkey [Conference presentation]. Design Train Conference 2: Designing Design Education, Amsterdam, Holland.
Akpınar, A., XU, M., Brooks, K. (2015). Design thinking: A model development based on archived documents. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 32(2), 151-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2015.2.5
Aslan, Ş. (2012). Temel tasarım eğitiminde duyum sürecine yönelik bir yaklaşım (Publication No. 315022) [ Doctoral dissertation , Hacettepe University]. YÖK Thesis Center.
Avsec, S., Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M. (2021). Investigating possibilities of developing self-directed learning in architecture students using design thinking. Sustainability, 13(8), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084369
Ayyıldız Potur, A. (2007). Mimarlık eğitimi başlangıcında biireyin ilgi-yetenek-yaratıcılık düzeyi ile tasarım performansı arasındaki ilişkiler (Publication No. 201324) [Doktoral dissertation, Yıldız Technical University]. YÖK Thesis Center.
Börekçi, N. (2015). Usage of design thinking tactics and ıdea generation strategies ın a brainstorming session. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 32(2), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2015.2.1
Badke-Schaub, P., Roozenburg, N., & Cardoso, C. (2010, October 19-20). Design thinking: A paradigm on its way from dilution to meaninglessness? [Conference presentation]. A. DAB Faculty of Design, 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, Australia.
Bayazıt, N. (2004). Tasarlama kuramları ve metotları. Birsen Yayınevi.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harward Business Review, 3-10.
Carmel-Gilfilen, C., Portillo, M. (2010). Developmental trajectories in design thinking: An examination of criteria. Design Studies, 31, 74-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.06.004
Choi, H. H., Kim, M. J. (2017). The effects of analogical and metaphorical reasoning on design thinking. Thinking Skill and Creativity, 23, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.004
Cross, N. (1993). Science and design methodology: A review. Research in Engineering Design, 5, 63-69.
Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Studies, 17, 49-56.
Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: What just happened?. Design Studies, 86, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101187
Dorst, K. (2010, October 19-20). The nature of design thinking. [Conference presentation]. A. DAB Faculty of Design, 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, Australia.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of design thinking and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Görgün Göksu, G. (2022). The effects of performance-based design tools on design thinking process (Publication No. 717421) [ Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. YÖK Thesis Center.
Goldschmidt, G., Badke-Schaub, P. (2010, October 19-20). The design-psychology indispensible research partnership. [Conference presentation]. A. DAB Faculty of Design, 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, Australia.
Goldschmidt, G., Rodgers, P. (2013). The design thinking approaches of theree different groups of designers based on self-reports. Design Studies, 34, 454-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.004
Groat, L., Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. Wiley.
Howard, Z. (2013, March 8). Introducing design thinking. Slideshare.Retrieved March 10, 2024, from https://www.slideshare.net/zaana/introducing-design-thinking
Howard, Z., Davis, K. (2011). From solving puzzles to designing solutions: Integrating design thinking into evidence based practice. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(4), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8TC81
Howard, Z., Senova, M., Melles, G. (2015). Exploring the role of mindset in design thinking: Implications for capability development and practice. Journal of Design Business&Society, 1(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.1.2.183_1
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
Jones, D. (2010, October 19-20). What kind of thinking is design thinking? [Conference presentation]. A. DAB Faculty of Design, 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, Australia.
Katoppo, M., Sudradjat, I. (2015). Combining participatory action research (PAR) and design thinking (DT) as an alternative research method in architecture. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.069
Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture the Journal of the Design Studies Forum, 3(3), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
Koçkan Özyıldız, P., Yıldız, P. (2020). The infographic model design thinking process. International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8(1), 282-310. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.114
Koçkan, P. (2012). Tasarım araştırmaları bağlamında tasarımcı düşünme ve tasarım süreci (Publication No. 314919) [ Master Thesis, Hacettepe University]. YÖK Thesis Center.
Kurt Çavuş, Ö. (2021). İçmimarlık öğrencilerinin akademik motivasyon profillerinin belirlenmesi ve tasarım düşüncesi özellikleri ile ilişkilerinin değerlendirilmesi (Publication No. 681933) [ Doctoral dissertation, Eskişehir Technical University]. YÖK Thesis Center.
Kurt Çavuş, Ö., Kaptan, B. (2019). Bilgi türleri bağlamında tasarım bilgisi ve Türkiye'de akademik alandaki yeri. Online Journal of Art and Design, 7(1), 67-85.
Kurt Çavuş, Ö., Kaptan, B. (2022). Tasarım düşüncesi bileşenleri ve iç mimarlık eğitimi çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi. Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi, 12(1), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1133803
Lawson, B. (2004). What designer know?. Elsevier.
Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think?. Elsevier.
Lindberg, T., Gumienny, R., Jobts, B., Meinel, C. (2010, October 19-20). Is there a need for a design thinking process?. [Conference presentation]. A. DAB Faculty of Design, 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, Australia.
Melles, G., Howard, Z., Tompson-Whiteside, S. (2012). Teaching design thinking: Expanding horizons in design education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(6), 162-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.035
Oxman, R. (2004). Think-maps: Teaching design thinking in design in design education. Design Studies, 25, 63-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00033-4
Rowe, P. (1991). Design thinking. MIT Press.
Savaş, S. (2019). Mekanı anlamak, aktarmak, üretmek, öğrenmek bütününde parametrik tasarım yaklaşımlarının iç mimarlık tasarım eğitimine entegrasyonu (Publication No. 622080) [ Doctoral dissertation, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University]. YÖK Thesis Center.
Simon, H. (1996). The science of the artificial. MIT Press.
Smulders, F., Subrahmanian, E. (2010, October 19-20). Design beyond design: Design thinking & design acting. [Conference presentation]. A. DAB Faculty of Design, 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, Australia.
Standford School. Retrieved March 10, 2025, from https://web.stanford.edu/~mshanks/MichaelShanks/files/509554.pdf
Taimur, S., Onuki, M. (2022). Design thinking as digital transformative pedagogy in higher sustainability education: Cases from Japan and Germany. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101994
Uluoğlu, B. (2003). Tasarlama araştırmaları-biliş çalışmaları ilişkileri üzerine bir irdeleme. Tol 1, 59-70.
Visser, W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. CRC Press.
Wrigley , C., Mosely, G., Tomitsch, M. (2018). Design thinking education: A comparison of massive open online courses. The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, 4(3), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.002
Yıldırım, A. Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yıldırım, İ. (2022). Temel tasarım eğitimi ve güncel öğrenme ortamlarında dijital öyküleme yöntemi (Publication No. 709683) [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University]. YÖK Thesis Center.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 