A Comparative Assessment Towards the Use of Informal Education Buildings as a Tool in Sustainability Education: A Case Study of Türkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.332Keywords:
Architecture and learning, Buildings that teach, Informal environmental education, Sustainable design, Sustainability in TürkiyeAbstract
Aim: This study explores how sustainably designed informal education buildings can serve as tools for sustainability education, focusing on both architectural features and their integration into educational practices. It addresses a research gap in Türkiye by examining the hidden educational potential of such buildings through theoretical analysis and comparative evaluation with international best practices. Method: Selected buildings in Türkiye were assessed based on sustainable architectural design principles and their capacity to contribute to public education. These were compared with internationally recognized examples using five core sustainability criteria: site and transportation, water, energy, materials, and indoor environmental quality. Data collection included literature review, field visits, and semi-structured interviews. Findings: Four out of five main sustainability themes—site and transportation, water, energy, and materials—are relatively well integrated into educational uses in international examples. However, indoor environmental quality remains underutilized in both international and national contexts. In Türkiye, educational use is primarily limited to features related to energy and site planning. National examples also fall short in terms of training duration and instructional quality compared to their international counterparts. Conclusion: For informal educational buildings to function effectively as tools for sustainability education in Türkiye, early-stage design processes must intentionally incorporate educational strategies tied to environmental features. Emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration and integrating educational theories into design can significantly enhance the impact and accessibility of sustainability education.
References
Adıgüzel Ö., (2006), “Okul Dışında Farklı Bir Öğrenme Ortamı Olarak Çocuk Müzeleri”, Eğitim Bilim Toplum Dergisi, 4 (14), 32-41.
Arslan A., (2009), “Lefebvre’in Üçlü-Algılanan, Tasarlanan, Yaşanan Mekan Diyalektiği”, Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi, Aralık 2009, 7-17.
Barr Kay S., (2011), “Green School That Teach: Identifying Attributes of Whole-school Sustainability”, Master Thesis, Colorado State University.
Bozdoğan A. E., (2011), “Müzeler”, Laçin Şimşek C., Editör, “Fen Öğretiminde Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları”, 1. Baskı, Pegem Academy.
Colardyn D., Bjornavold J., (2004), “Validation of Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Learning: policy and practices in EU Member States”, European Journal of Education, 39 (1), 69-89.
Cole B. L., (2014), “The Teaching Green School Building: A Framework for Linking Architecture and Environmental Education”, Environmental Education Research, 20 (6), 836-857.
Dip C. Z., (1987), “Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Education: Concepts/Applicability”, AIP Conference Proceedings, 173, 300-315.
Gramatakos A. L. and Lavau, S., (2019), “Informal Learning for Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 378-392.
Guarinello E., (2005), “Why We All Should Care: Building A Case for Sustainable Design In Museums, Exhibitions: Conceptual Design”, George Washington University, USA.
Hopkinson, P., Hughes, P. and Layer, G. (2008), “Sustainable graduates: linking formal, informal and campus curricula to embed education for sustainable development in the student learning experience”, Environmental Education Research, Vol. 14 No.4, pp. 435-454.
Jones J., (2010), “Guidelines for the Design of Sustainable Learning Laboratories that Teach Through Architecture”, AIA Upjohn Award Final Report, College of Architecture and Urban Studies Virginia Tech, USA.
Lipscombe, B.P. (2008), “Exploring the role of the extra-curricular sphere in higher education for sustainable development in the United Kingdom”, Environmental Education Research, Vol. 14, No.4, pp. 455-468.
Meredith J., Cantrell D., Conner M., Evener B., Hunn D., Spector P., (2000), “Best Practices for Environmental Education: Guidelines for Success”, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Education, USA.
Orr D., (1997), “Architecture as a Pedagogy II”, Conservation Biology, 11(3), 597-600.
Priest S., (1986), “Redefining Outdoor Education: A Matter of Many Relationships”, Journal of Environmental Education, 17 (3), 13-15.
Laçin Şimşek, C. L.(ed.), (2011), Fen Öğretiminde Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları, Pegem Academy.
UNESCO. (2022), Education for Sustainable Development; Berlin Declaration, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381228/PDF/381228eng.pdf.multi (accessed on: 16/04/2025).
United Nations, (1972), Report of The United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, http://www.un-documents.net/aconf48-14r1.pdf (accessed on: 25/04/2025).
United Nations, (1987), Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (Brundtland Report), http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf (accessed on: 25/04/2025).
United Nations, (1992), Agenda 21, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
(accessed on: 25/04/2025).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.Funding data
-
Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi
Grant numbers Project Number: 2016-A-30
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 