The Impact of Trade on Architecture During the Seljuk-Ottoman Period: A Study on Caravanserai and Khan Structures in the Southeastern Anatolia Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.319Keywords:
Caravanserai, Khan, Ottoman, Seljuks, Trade, Southeastern AnatoliaAbstract
This study analyzes the impact of trade on architectural structures and examines how caravanserais and khans gradually transformed into commercial centers. Sixty-one structures built between the 13th and 20th centuries in the Southeastern Anatolia Region were identified, though historical information was unavailable for 12 of them. Among the 49 examined buildings, four belonged to the Seljuk period, 3 to the Early Ottoman period, and 42 to the Ottoman period. Eight well-preserved structures with clearly identifiable architectural elements and documented construction dates were selected for detailed analysis. The selection process included examples from the Seljuk (13th century), Early Ottoman (14th-15th century), and Ottoman (16th century and beyond) periods. Field studies were conducted to document the structures' current condition. In contrast, archival documents and official records were used to analyze architectural plans, facade designs, and the relationship between open and closed spaces.
Comparative analyses were carried out through visuals, tables, and drawings, which were systematically converted into schematic representations and categorized based on their construction periods. The findings reveal that trade routes and economic changes directly influenced the architectural plans of khans and caravanserais. While security-focused structures were common in the 13th century, declining trade in the 14th century led to the preference for smaller, enclosed plans. From the 15th century onwards, courtyards were reintroduced, and during the Ottoman period, khans evolved into commercial centers. After the 16th century, shop units were added, the number of floors increased, and aesthetic elements became more prominent in the 18th and 19th centuries.
This study highlights the architectural transformation of khans and caravanserais, emphasizing the impact of trade on their identity and the significance of factors contributing to the preservation of cultural heritage.
Metrics
References
Ahmad, S., & Chase, S. C. (2004). Design Generation for the Central Asian Caravanserai. Paper presented at eDesign in Architecture, 1st ASCAAD International Conference, KFUPM, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, 7–9 December.
Akalp, S., & Ayçam, İ. (2024). Evaluation of Urban Renewal Practices in Traditional Settlement Structures in the Context of Sustainability: The Case of Alipaşa-Lalebey Neighborhood. Kent Akademisi, 17(4), 1500-1530. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1432288
Akkuş, Y. (2009). IV. ve V. asırlarda Osmanlı ve Avrupa ekonomileri: Bir mukayese denemesi. Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, 0(40), 33-69. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusoskon/issue/9505/118815
Albak, B. (2007). Anadolu Selçuklu Dönemi Kervansarayları. T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.
Altman, I., & Chemers, M. M. (1980). Culture And Environment. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Monterey, California.
Aslan, H. (2007). Kültür Kavramının Tarihsel Gelişimi. Folklor Edebiyat, 52(4), 93-102.
Aslanapa, O. (1990). Türk Sanatı 1-2. Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.
Barisitz, S. (2017). Studies on the History and Culture Along the Continental Silk Road. Studies in Economic History. Vienna: Springer. ISSN 2364-1800. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51213-6
Başkaya, Z. (2016). Diyarbakır İli İpekböcekçiliğinin Türkiye’deki Yeri ve Mekansal Analizi. Uluslararası Diyarbakır Sempozyumu.
Bektaş, C. (1999). Selçuklu Kervansarayları Korunmaları, Kullanımları Üzerine Bir Öneri.
Blessing, P., & Goshgarian, R. (Eds.). (2017). Architecture and Landscape in Medieval Anatolia, 1100-1500. Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1g051tq.
Burlot, J. (1995). La civilisation islamique. Hachette, Paris.
Campbell, J. L. (2011). Architecture and Identity: The Occupation, Use, and Reuse of Mughal Caravanserais. Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto.
De Cesaris, A., Ferretti, L. V., & Osanloo, H. (2014). Iran. Città, Percorsi, Caravanserragli (pp. 1-264). Edilstampa.
Faroqhi, S. (1993). Tarsus and the Tahrir . Osmanlı Araştırmaları, 13(13). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/oa/issue/10965/131137
Güran, C. (1978). Türk Hanlarının Gelişimi ve İstanbul Hanları Mimarisi. Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını, İstanbul.
Güreşsever Cantay, G. (2016). Osmanlı Menzil Kervansarayları. FSM yayınları, ISBN: 978-605-84079-4-7, İstanbul.
İlter, İ. (1969). Tarihi Türk Hanları. KGM matbaası, Ankara.
K. Erdmann. (1961). Das Anatolische Karavansarag Des 13. Jahrtıunderts. Berlin, Band l, s.184-187, Band II, Tafel XXII.
Karadoğan, S., & Özgen, N. (2006). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde Tarımsal Üretimin Niteliği, Değişimi Ve Dağılışının Cbs Ortamında Analizi. 4. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Bilişim Günleri, 13 – 16 Eylül 2006 / Fatih Üniversitesi / İstanbul-Türkiye.
Kathryn, F., & Emily, B. (2019). The road from above: Remotely sensed discovery of early modern travel infrastructure in Afghanistan.
Köprülü, F. (1942). "Vakfa Ait Tarihî Istılâhlar Ribât". Vakıflar Dergisi, 2, 267-278.
Korn, L. (2020). Ribat-i Mahi (Khurasan-i Razavi, Iran): Evidence of a Saljuq Building Inscription.
Köroğlu. (2021). Batı Anadolu'da Kervansaraylar ve Bu Kervansarayların Anadolu Ticarî Hayatındaki Yeri ve Önemi (1071-1308). Master Thesis, Kafkas University, Kars.
Kuban, D. (2007). Osmanlı Mimarisi. İstanbul: YEM Yay., 602.
Kuşçu, V. (2000). “Akdeniz Bölgesi ile Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgeleri Arasındaki Sınırın Yeniden Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Deneme, Firat University, Elazig.
Kuyulu, İ. (1996). Özbekistan Ve Türkmenistan'da Bulunan Ortaçağ Kervansarayları Üzerine Gözlemler. Türk Dünyası İncelemeleri Dergisi, 97-116.
Lawrance, R. J. (1987). Housing, Dwellings and Homes: Design Theory, Research and Practice. John Wiley And Sons, Chichester.
Liu, X. (2010). The Silk Road in World History. Oxford University press, ISBN 978-0-19-516174-8.
Nikaein, G. (2019). Tarihi Ticaret Yollarının Kent Ticaret Merkezine Etkileri, İpek Yolu Örneği (Bursa ve Tebriz Kentleri), Gazi üniversitesi Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
Ögel, C., & Avcı, S. (2022). Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesinde İmalat Sanayinin Gelişimi ve Yapısal Özellikleri. TÜCAUM 2022 Uluslararası Coğrafya Sempozyumu, 12-14 Ekim 2022 /12-14 October 2022, Ankara.
Tuncer, O. C. (2007). Anadolu’da Kervan Yolları. Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.
Turan, O. (1946). Selçuklu Kervansarayları. Belleten Dergisi, X (39).
Un, H. I. (2012). Anadolu Selçuklu Sanatı-V. Atatürk University, Erzurum.
Usta Keleş, G. (1994). Anadolu Osmanlı Dönemi Mimarisinde Mekan Analizi: Han ve Kervansaray Yapılarında Uygulama. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University,Trabzon.
Tükel Yavuz, A. (1997). The Concepts That Shape Anatolian Seljuq Caravanserais. Muqarnas, 14, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523237
Tükel Yavuz, A. (1991). Mirçinge Han ve Anadolu Selçuklu dönemi eşodaklı kervansarayları arasındaki yeri. ODTÜ MFD, 11(1-2), 41-55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 