Beyond Campus Walls: Studentification in Ankara’s İşçi Blokları Neighborhood – Housing, Affordability, and Community Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.345Keywords:
Housing affordability, Studentification, University–city relationsAbstract
This article examines the dynamics of studentification in İşçi Blokları, Ankara—a 1970s cooperative-housing district adjacent to Middle East Technical University (METU). Originally constructed in 1973 as a workers’ cooperative housing estate, İşçi Blokları today functions as a major student-housing cluster, with many dwellings rented to students. Using a mixed-methods design (survey and in-depth interviews, 2022–2023), the study analyses how student demand reshapes housing affordability, dwelling quality, and neighborhood cohesion. Studentification emerges as a multifaceted urban issue. Residents depict students as a “guaranteed market,” linking their presence to higher property values but also to reduced maintenance and social frictions; yet many support a more balanced citywide distribution and acknowledge students’ economic and cultural contributions. Empirically, we find rent inflation and physical decline in older cooperative stock alongside growth in cafés, study-friendly venues, and youth-oriented services that enhance cultural vibrancy. In response, the paper proposes a new housing model that brings together the municipality, housing cooperatives, and universities. The model sets affordable rent limits (30–35% of household income), creates a revolving renovation fund to repair old buildings, and includes university agreements to guarantee stable student occupancy. Together, these measures aim to keep rents stable, improve living standards, and prevent resident displacement. Overall, studentification in İşçi Blokları is a transformative socio-spatial process requiring inclusive housing policy, multi-scalar governance, and the revitalization of cooperative institutions to balance affordability, diversity, and urban sustainability.
References
Allinson, J. (2006). Over-educated, over-exuberant and over here? The impact of students on cities. Planning Practice and Research, 21(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450600901541
Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2001). Disentangling area effects: Evidence from deprived and non-deprived neighborhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2277–2298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087162
Baron, M. G., & Kaplan, S. (2010). The impact of 'studentification' on the rental housing market.
Boersma, K. (2013). Paradoxes of studentification: Social mix versus gentrification in a disadvantaged neighborhood in Amsterdam East. The Open Urban Studies Journal, 6(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874942901306010040
Brennan, E. M., Jones, K., Bender, R. E., & Elizabeth, R. (2017). Gentrification and displacement: An environmental justice challenge for social work in urban environments. PDXScholar. Retrieved from https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/socwork_fac
Brookfield, K. (2019). Studentified areas as contested heterotopias: Findings from Southampton. Area, 51(2), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12458
Chatterton, P. (1999). University students and city centers – The formation of exclusive geographies. Geoforum, 30(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7185(98)00028-1
Chatterton, P. (2010). The student city: An ongoing story of neoliberalism, gentrification, and commodification. Environment and Planning A, 42(3), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42293
Demirdag, İ., & Nirwansyah, A. W. (2025). Exploring university effect in Turkish regional development—A multifaceted statistical approach. Cities, 159, Article 105730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105730
Daneri, D., Trencher, G., & Petersen, J. (2015). Students as change agents in a town-wide sustainability transformation: The Oberlin Project at Oberlin College. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 14–21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S187734351500069X
Endeksa. Ankara Çankaya İşçi Blokları: Demografi Nüfus, eğitim seviyesi, sosyoekonomik durum. Retrieved from https://www.endeksa.com/tr/analiz/turkiye/ankara/cankaya/isci-bloklari/demografi
Fabula, S., Boros, L., Kovács, Z., Horváth, D., & Pál, V. (2017). Studentification, diversity and social cohesion in post-socialist Budapest. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 66(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.66.2.5
Felsenstein, D. (1996). The university in the metropolitan arena: Impacts and public policy implications. Urban Studies, 33(9), 1565–1580. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098966628
Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/464648
Foucault, M. (1998). Different spaces. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, method and epistemology. (pp. 175–185). The New Press.
Hansu, Ç. (2023). Unravelling the studentification process: A case study of İşçi Blokları neighborhood (Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University).
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
He, S. (2014). Consuming urban living in ‘villages in the city’: Studentification in Guangzhou, China. Urban Studies, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014543703
Holton, M., & Riley, M. (2014). Talking on the move: Place-based interviewing with undergraduate students. Area, 46(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12070
Holton, M., & Mouat, C. M. (2021). The rise (and rise) of vertical studentification: Exploring the drivers of studentification in Australia. Urban Studies, 58(9), 1866–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020925246
Hubbard, P. (2008). Regulating the social impacts of studentification: A Loughborough case study. Environment and Planning A, 40(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1068/a396
Hubbard, P. (2009). Geographies of studentification and purpose-built student accommodation: Leading separate lives? Environment and Planning A, 41(8), 1903–1923. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4149
Johnson, P. (2006). Unravelling Foucault’s 'different spaces'. History of the Human Sciences, 19, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106069669
Kenna, T. (2011). Studentification in Ireland? Analyzing the impacts of students and student accommodation on Cork City. Irish Geography, 44(2–3), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00750778.2011.618073
Kinton, C., Smith, D., & Harrison, J. (2016). De-studentification: Emptying housing and neighborhoods of student populations. Environment and Planning A, 48(8), 1617–1635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16642446
Kinton, C., Smith, D. P., Harrison, J., & Culora, A. (2018). New frontiers of studentification: The commodification of student housing as a driver of urban change. The Geographical Journal, 184(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12263
Knight Frank. (2019). Global student property 2019: A global perspective on student property and investment. Knight Frank.
Lees, L., Shin, H. B., & López-Morales, E. (2015). Global gentrifications. In Policy Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447313472.001.0001
Ley, D. (2003). Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2527–2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000136192
Ley, D., & Dobson, C. (2008). Are there limits to gentrification? The contexts of impeded gentrification in Vancouver. Urban Studies, 45(12), 2471–2498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008097103
Long, J. (2016). Living with the consequences of policy decisions: Reactions to student lifestyles in the neighborhood. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 8, 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2016.1157599
McDougall, E., Webber, K., & Petrie, S. (2023). Addressing the need for more nuanced approaches towards transit-induced gentrification: A case for a complex systems thinking framework. Geography Compass. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12681
Middle East Technical University. (2023). At a glance (Sayılarla ODTÜ): 2022–2023 student numbers. https://ilkbakista.metu.edu.tr/
Middle East Technical University. (2024). At a glance (institutional indicators): Dormitory capacity and number of dormitories. https://kgpo.metu.edu.tr/tr/ilk-bakista-odtu
Middle East Technical University, Dormitories Directorate. (2025). General features (dormitories overview). https://yurtlar.metu.edu.tr/tr/genel-ozellikler
Moos, M., Revington, N., Wilkin, T., & Andrey, J. (2018). The knowledge economy city: Gentrification, studentification and youthification, and their connections to universities. Urban Studies, 56(6), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017745235
Mulhearn, C. J., & Franco, M. (2018). If you build it will they come? The boom in purpose-built student accommodation in central Liverpool: Destudentification, studentification and the future of the city. Local Economy, 33(5), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218792740
Munro, M., Turok, I., & Livingston, M. (2009). Students in cities: A preliminary analysis of their patterns and effects. Environment and Planning A, 41(8), 1805–1825. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41133
Munro, M., & Livingston, M. (2011). Student impacts on urban neighbourhoods: Policy approaches, discourses and dilemmas. Urban Studies, 49(8), 1679–1694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011419237
Munro, M., & Livingston, M. (2012). Student impacts on urban neighborhoods: Policy approaches, discourses, and dilemmas. Urban Studies, 49, 1679–1694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011419237
Nottingham City Council. (2024). Purpose-Built Student Accommodation Supplementary Planning Document (PBSA SPD). https://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/media/dyedumjv/purpose-build-student-accommodation-spd.pdf
Revington, N. (2018). Pathways and processes: Reviewing the role of young adults in urban structure. The Professional Geographer, 70(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1288574
Revington, N. (2022). Post-studentification? Promises and pitfalls of a near-campus urban intensification strategy. Urban Studies, 59(7), 1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211021358
Revington, N., & Wray, A. J. D. (2022). Land-use planning approaches to near-campus neighborhoods and student housing development patterns in Ontario, Canada. Housing Policy Debate, 34(5), 668–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2022.2093939
Ruiu, M. L. (2017). Collaborative management of studentification processes: The case of Newcastle upon Tyne. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(4), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-017-9549-2
Russo, A. P., Van Den Berg, L., & Lavanga, M. (2007). Toward a sustainable relationship between city and university. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x07307208
Sage, J., Smith, D., & Hubbard, P. (2012a). The diverse geographies of studentification: Living alongside people not like us. Housing Studies, 27(8), 1057–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.728570
Sage, J., Smith, D. P., & Hubbard, P. (2012b). The rapidity of studentification and population change: There goes the (student)hood. Population, Space and Place, 18(5), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.690
Sage, J., Smith, D. P., & Hubbard, P. (2013). New-build studentification: A panacea for balanced communities? Urban Studies, 50(13), 2623–2641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013477694
Sarıipek, D. B., Peker, Z., & Cerev, G. (2024). Addressing the housing crisis: Insights from a study on university students in Turkey. Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach, 14, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.15388/SW.2024.14.4
Smith, D. P. (2005). ‘Studentification’: The gentrification factory? In R. Atkinson & G. Bridge (Eds.), Gentrification in a global context (pp. 72–89). Routledge.
Stimson, R. J., & Baum, S. (n.d.). Inner-city renaissance: The changing face, functions and structure of Brisbane’s inner-city. National evaluation of the Common wealth Government’s supported accommodation program. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43481782
Turkish Statistical Institute [TÜİK]. (2023). National education statistics, 2023. Retrieved from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=National-Education-Statistics-2023-53444&dil=2
UK National HMO Lobby. (2009). Balanced communities and studentification.
UK Government. (2020). House in multiple occupation licence [Online]. https://www.gov.uk/house-in-multiple-occupation-licence [accessed 26 April 2020].
UK Government. (n.d.). When is permission required? (Planning Practice Guidance). https://www.gov.uk/guidance/when-is-permission-required
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Yalçınkaya, G. (2020). Ankara’da üniversitede barınma sorunu. MADjournal (Mekânda Adalet Derneği).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 