Adaptive Reuse Suggestions in Interior Architecture Education: A Registered Workshop in Ankara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2024.304Keywords:
Adaptive reuse, Conservation, Interior design education, WorkshopAbstract
This study aims to determine both the recommendations for the conservation and reuse of historical buildings in interior architecture education and the learning outcomes of the restoration course. A registered building in Ankara, which formerly served as a production workshop for a vocational high school, has been identified as the study's main issue as it is no longer in use after having served its purpose. As part of the restoration course in this case, senior students in interior architecture department of Selcuk University were asked to submit a variety of function concepts for the registered building. The study focused on both qualitative and quantitative research methods, which included four stages: preparation, analysis, design, and evaluation. Through examples of applications from our nation and around the world, students were given the information they needed to understand the restoration during the first phase, preparation. The second stage, analysis, entails taking measurements of the building's interior and exterior as well as photographing and collecting written and visual records of it. The third step, the design phase, begins with the choice of a new function appropriate for the building's location and style in light of all available data and documentation. The students were asked to assess their level of knowledge regarding conservation and adaptive reuse as well as the learning outcomes of the restoration course before and after taking it in the final stage of the evaluation process, which took place after the fourteen-week restoration course. This study helped interior architecture students gain experience with a holistic design process through an adaptive reuse proposal project. In conclusion, increasing the number of courses on conservation and adaptive reuse in interior architecture education is important in training interior architects who are experts and competent in the field of reuse.
Metrics
References
Ahunbay, Z. (2011). Tarihi çevre koruma ve restorasyon. İstanbul: YEM Yayın.
Altınoluk, Ü. (1998). Binaların yeniden kullanımı. İstanbul: YEM Yayın.
Ankara Metropolitan Municipality Culture and Nature Department Archive, (2023).
Apaydın Başa, B. (2002). Hızlı gelişme sürecinde işlev değiştirmeye zorlanan yapıların büyük kent modeli içinde irdelenmesi, (Master’s thesis). Marmara University, Türkiye. Access Address (30.07.2023): https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
Arcan, E.F. & Evci, F. (1992). Mimari Tasarıma Yaklaşım 1-Bina Bilgisi Çalışmaları, Tasarım Yayın Grubu: İstanbul.
Ay, R.B. (2013). Özgün İşlevini yitirmiş endüstri mirası yapıların yeniden kullanımında uygun işlev seçimi: İstanbul Çengelköy İspirto/ Suma fabrikası örneği. (Master’s Thesis). Mimar Sinan University, Türkiye. Access Address (05.08.2023): https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Aydin, D. & Okuyucu, S.E. (2009). Yeniden kullanıma adaptasyon ve sosyo-kültürel sürdürülebilirlik bağlamında afyonkarahisar millet hamamının değerlendirilmesi. Megaron 4 (1). 1-14. Access Address (05.07.2023): https://jag.journalagent.com/megaron/pdfs/MEGARON_4_1_35_44.pdf.
Atalan, Ö. & Sevinç, Z. (2016). Necessity of “historic cultural heritage and conservation” course in interior architecture education, SHS Web of Conferences, 26 01111, DOI:10.1051/shsconf/ 20162601111.
Brooker, G. & Stone, S. (2004). Rereadings: interior architecture and the design principles of remodelling existing buildings. UK:RIBA Enterprises.
Büyükmıhçı, G. & Yücel, S. (2012). Discussion on conservation education through restoration praxis in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 46. 2721 – 2727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.554.
Cantacuzino, S. (1989). Re/Architecture: old buildings/new Uses. Thames and Hudson: London.
CARTA DEL RESTAURO, (1931). The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments Access Address (31.07.2024):https://www.icomos.org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSTR_tr0660878001536681682.pdf
Celadyn, M. (2016). Inner space elements in environmentally responsible interior design education. World Trans.Eng. Technol. Educ, 14, 495–499.
Cordan, Ö. Dinçay, D. Teixeira, F.F. (2014). Adaptive reuse in ınterior architecture: a case study in famagusta, cyprus, The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 8 (1), 1-15.
Cramer, J. & Breitling, S. (2007). Architecture in existing fabric planning, design, building. Birkhaauser Publiher, ISBN:9783034609449.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Doğan, C.D. (2007). İstatistik- 1 ders notları (eğitim bilimleri fakültesi). Access Address(09.08.2023):https://dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12575/41482/%C4%B0STAT%C4%B0ST%C4%B0K%201%20%28E%C4%9E%C4%B0T%C4%B0M%20B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MLER%C4%B0%20FAK%C3%9CLTES%C4%B0%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Efe Yavaşcan, E. (2021). Tarihi çevrede tasarım: yeni yapı ve yeniden işlevlendirme üzerine atölye eğitimi. Modular Journal, (4)1, 1-15.
Elsorady, D.A. (2013). Assessment of the compatibility of new uses for heritage buildings: the example of Alexandria National Museum, Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Cultural Heritage Access Address (05.07.2023): http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.10.011.
Embaby, M.E. (2014). Heritage conservation and architectural education: “an educational methodology for design studios’’ Housing and Building National Research Center Journal,(10) 3, 339-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.12.007
Eren, M.E., Demirarslan, O. &Yücel, F.S. (2007). İç mimarlık lisansüstü eğitimi ve restorasyon ile ilişkisi. İÇMEK 2007 I. Ulusal İç Mimarlık Eğitimi Kongresi içinde (s 359-366). İstanbul: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi/Taşkışla.
Google Earth, (2023). Access Address (01.08.2023):https://earth.google.com/web/search/mimar+sinan+tenik+lisesi/@39.93778196,32.8182336,868.01179941a,312.71033953d,35y,0h,0t,0r/data=CigiJgokCdLJdhABEElAEZXR9JTE2khAGRY1HUj6zTZAIWCWk192XzVA.
Gökarslan A. B. & Tuncer, H. (2023). Conservation courses effects on architecture students’ conservation awareness: analysis of Isparta and Burdur houses. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 8 (1), 370-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1248804.
Gönül, B. & Küçükarslan Emiroğlu, M. (2007). Türkiye’de iç mimarlık eğitiminde restorasyon. İÇMEK, I. Ulusal İç Mimarlık Eğitimi Kongresi içinde (367-385). İstanbul: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi/Taşkışla.
Grimmer, E. A. & Weeks, D. K. (2010). Preservation brief 14: new exterior additions to historic buildings: preservation concerns. Access Address (31.07.2024): https://www.nps.gov/tPS/how-to-preserve/briefs/14-exterior-additions.htm
Hasırcı, D., Bakır Küçükkaya, İ., Edes, Z., Tatari, H., Rolla, S., Çalişkanelli, M. & Kabaçam, G. (2022). Concept and scale focus in interior design education: An adaptive reuse museum project. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7 (2), 652-673. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1170019
ICOMOS (1964). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites. Venice, Italy. Access Address (31.07.2027):
https://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf
Ijla, A., & Broström, T. (2015). The sustainable viability of adaptive reuse of historic buildings: the experiences of two world heritage old cities; Bethlehem in Palestine and Visby in Sweden. International Invention Journal of Arts and Social Sciences 2(4), 52‐66. ISSN: 2408-7238.
Jahromi, F.S. (2015). An assesment of the significance of adaptive reuse focused design studio in ınterior design education. (Master’s thesis). Eastern Mediterranean University, North Cyprus, Access Address (05.08.2023): http://irep.emu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11129/4067/JahromiFaraneh.pdf?sequence=1
Karslı, T.U. & Aytıs, S. (2018). Efe Yavaçcan / old skin, new use: adaptive reuse, Yapı Dergisi, 435, 46-51.
Kaşlı, B. (2009). İstanbul’da yeniden işlevlendirilen korumaya değer endüstri yapıları ve iç mekân müdahaleleri: Santral istanbul Örneği. (Master’s thesis). İstanbul Technical University, Türkiye. Access Address (11.08.2023): https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
Köksal, G. (2006). İstanbul’daki endüstri mirası için koruma ve yeniden kullanım önerileri. İTÜ Dergisi/a, 5 (2). 125-136.
Kuban, D. (1969). Modern restorasyon ilkeleri üzerine yorumlar, Vakıflar Dergisi, (8), 341-356.
Küçük, İ. Ç. (2022). Tarihi yapıların yeniden işlevlendirilmesine bütüncül bir yaklaşım: Konya ili Obruk Hanı. (Master’s thesis). Selçuk University, Türkiye. Access Address (05.08.2023): https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/.
Lewis, R.H. (2013). Re-Architecture: adaptive reuse of buildings focus on interiors. (Master’s thesis). Manipal University, India. Access Address (01.08.2023): https://issuu.com/ramolalewis/docs/final_report.
Madran, E. (2007). Ulusal mevzuatın tarihsel gelişimi. Kültürel Miras Mevzuatı, 52–76. Anadolu Üniversitesi.
Noraslı, M. (2023). İç mimari proje sürecinde durum çalışması modeli: apartman girişi tasarımı. Turkish Journal of Landscape Research, 6(2), 226-234.
Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient alpha: ınterpret with caution. Eur. J. Psychol., 9(4), 687-696.
Pereira, A., R., Post, J., M., Erkelens, P., A. (2004). Reusing built heritage resources with sustainability, In X. Wu (editor), Sustainability and Innovation in Construction and Real Estate, Proceedings of the 2nd CIB Student Chapters International Symposium. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 30‐31 October, 727‐736.
Powell, K. (1999). Architecture reborn: converting old buildings for new uses. New York: Rizzoli.
Roos, J. (2007). Discovering the assignment. redevelopment in practice. delft: VSSD.
Öter, A.H. (1996). Kullanım dışı kalmış binaların dönüştürülmesi sorununa ilişkin bir deneme (Unpublished Master Thesis, I.T.U., İstanbul.
T.R. Presidency Legislation Information System (2023). Access Address (01.08.2023): https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.2863.pdf.
Tunç, B. & Sevinç Kayıhan K. (2018). Ortak çalışma olgusu ve ofis kafeler, Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi, 3(2), 231-248. DOI: 10.26835/my.459406.
Yıldırım Gönül, B. & Balcı Yaşar, S. (2019). Türkiye ve KKTC’de iç mimarlık eğitiminde koruma bilinci üzerine güncel bir araştırma, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(2), 294-311. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.588291.
Yüceer, H. & İpekoğlu, B. (2012). An architectural assessment method for new exterior additions to historic buildings, Journal of Cultural Heritage 13, 419–425. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.12.002.
Van Den Berghe, J. (2014). De Provocatie Van Het Schijnbaar Onmogelijke. In A+ Architectuur in België, 250, 42-46.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 