Parking Suitability and Site Selection Analysis Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Techniques: AHP, TOPSIS, and VIKOR – A Case Study of Pendik District (Istanbul)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2025.314Keywords:
Parking demand, Parking suitability, Site selection, GIS, MCDAAbstract
Demand for parking areas has increased with the growing population and increasing number of vehicles. Large cities are suffering from a lack of parking areas, which are one of the most significant parts of the modern urban transportation system and traffic management. Locating parking areas has become a major challenge for the urban transport planners, especially in the downtown of metropolises. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with geographic analysis tools can provide a scientific approach to determine optimum locations for parking areas. In this paper, the essential factors affecting parking site selection were considered and data sets concerning these factors were created by GIS analysis techniques. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a Multiple-Criteria-Decision-Analysis (MCDA) method was applied to derive weights of the selected parameters. To conduct parking demand analysis, the parking suitability map was produced by integrating the GIS with AHP. Then, suitable parking areas were determined in a zoning plan that was based on the highest suitability on the map. Other MCDA techniques including TOPSIS and VIKOR were examined and compared to determine the order of preferences among suitable parking areas. Similar to the traditional AHP method, the same results were obtained in the ranking of parking areas with the other methods. Using GIS with these MCDA techniques appears to be a usable approach for better resource allocation as well as parking site selection.
Metrics
References
Abdullahi S, Mahmud ARB, Pradhan, B (2014) Spatial modelling of site suitability assessment for hospitals using geographical information system-based multicriteria approach at Qazvin city, Iran. Geocarto International 29(2):164-184.
Al Garni, H. Z., & Awasthi, A. (2017). Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy, 206(July), 1225–1240.
Aliniai, K., Yarahmadi, A., Zarin, J. Z., Yarahmadi, H., & Bakhtiari Lak, S. (2015). Parking Lot Site Selection : An Opening Gate Towards Sustainable GIS-based Urban Traffic Management. Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 43(4)(December), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-014-0415-3
Alkan, T., & Durduran, S. S. (2021). Gis-supported mapping of suitable parking areas using ahp method: The case of konya. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 46(4/W5-2021), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-Archives-XLVI-4-W5-2021-51-2021
Aydinoglu, A. C., Sisman, S., Sasmaz, M. A., & Akin, S. N.(2024). Sürdürülebilir Ulaşım Planlamasında CBS Tabanlı Otopark Uygunluk Analizi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(3), 628-640.
Ben-Joseph, E. (2012). ReThinking a lot: the design and culture of parking (Vol. 7). MA: MIT.
Butt, A., Ahmad, S. S., Shabbir, R., & Erum, S. (2017). GIS based surveillance of road traffic accidents (RTA) risk for Rawalpindi city: A geo-statistical approach. Kuwait Journal of Science, 44(4), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.5383/swes.7.02.002
Darani, S. K., Eslami, A. A., Jabbari, M., & Asefi, H. (2018). Parking lot site selection using a fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework in Tuyserkan, Iran. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000456
Demir, Selcuk, Basaraner, M., & Taskin Gumus, A. (2021). Selection of suitable parking lot sites in megacities: A case study for four districts of Istanbul. Land Use Policy, 111(August), 105731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105731
Demir, Sulçuk. (2016). Use of The Spatial Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques in The Selection of Car Parking Area. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
Farzanmanesh, R., Naeeni, A. G., & Abdullah, A. M. (2010). Parking site selection management using Fuzzy logic and Multi Criteria Decision Making. EnvironmentAsia, 3, 109–116.
Hensher, D. A., & King, J. (2001). Parking demand and responsiveness to supply, pricing and location in the Sydney central business district. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(3), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00054-3
Hosseinlou, M. H., Balal, E., Massahi, A., & Ghiasi, I. (2012). Developing optimal zones for urban parking spaces by Arc GIS and AHP. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(11), 3618–3622.
Ibraheem, A., & Atia, N. (2016). Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Multi-Storey Car Parks Location in a Small Area. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 17(5), 1–12.
Jelokhani-niaraki, M., & Malczewski, J. (2015). A group multicriteria spatial decision support system for parking site selection problem: A case study. Land Use Policy, 42, 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.003
Jonuzi, E., Alkan, T., Durduran, S. S., & Selvi, H. Z. (2024). Using GIS-supported MCDA method for appropriate site selection of parking lots: The case study of the city of Tetovo, North Macedonia. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1319605
Karimi, V., Ebadi, H., & Ahmady, S. (2009). Modeling of Parking Site Selection by Using GIS with Emphasis on Weighting and Integrating Layers Archive of SID. Journal of Faculty of Eng, 38(3).
Kazazi Darani, S., Akbari Eslami, A., Jabbari, M., & Asefi, H. (2018). Parking Lot Site Selection Using a Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Framework in Tuyserkan, Iran. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000456
Kumar, M., & Biswas, V. (2013). Identification of Potential Sites for Urban Development Using GIS Based Multi Criteria Evaluation Technique . A Case Study of Shimla Municipal Area , Shimla District ,. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 4, 45–51.
Kumar, P., & Ramcharan, E. K. (2008). Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1384–1395.
Lee, M. (2007). A Method of Performance Evaluation by Using the Analytic Network Process and Balanced Score Card. 235–240.
Malczewski, J. W. (1999). GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis. In Computers & Geosciences (1st ed., Vol. 26, p. 392).
OSM.(2023) Open Street Map (OSM). https://www.openstreetmap.org/.
Ozturk, D., & Kilic-Gul, F. (2020). GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for parking site selection. Kuwait Journal of Science, 47(3), 1–23.
Palevičius, V., Paliulis, G. M., Venckauskaitė, J., & Vengrys, B. (2013). Evaluation of the Requirement for Passenger Car Parking Spaces Using Multi-Criteria Methods. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.727463
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. In McGraw-Hill.
Samani, Z. N., Karimi, M., & Alesheikh, A. A. (2018). A Novel Approach to Site Selection : Collaborative Multi-Criteria Decision Making through Geo-Social Network (Case Study :Public Parking ). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030082
Taherdoost, H. (2017). Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); A Step by Step Approach. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 244–246.
TÜİK. (2023). Population and Demography Statistics, Turkey Statistics Institution. www.tuik.gov.tr
Ullah, K. M., & Mansourian, A. (2015). Evaluation of Land Suitability for Urban Land-Use Planning : Case Study Dhaka City. Transaction in GIS, 20 (1), 20–37.
USGS. (2023). US Geological Survey (USGS) - Earth Explorer. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
Wang, G., Li, Q., Guoxue, L., & Lijun, C. (2009). Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP : A case study in Beijing , China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2414–2421.
Xiaorui, Z., Chuanglin, F., Zhenbo, W., & Haitao, M. A. (2013). Urban Construction Land Suitability Evaluation Based on Improved Multi-criteria Evaluation Based on GIS ( MCE-GIS ): Case of N ew Hefei City , China. 23(6), 740–753.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.