Determination of Drinking Water Basin Protection Zones: Case of Beyşehir Basin, Türkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2024.290Keywords:
AHP, Drinking water basin, GIS, Protection zones, Sustainable watershed managementAbstract
Global climate change, one of the most important problems of today, and human activities have negative effects on the sustainability of natural resources. It has become necessary to establish planning and management mechanisms for the sustainable use of drinking water basins within the protection-use balance. Beyşehir Basin, Türkiye was chosen as the study area. The aim of this study is to present a new model approach for the use of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Geographic Information Systems, based on the unique topographic, hydrological, and environmental characteristics of the basin, in the determination of the drinking water basin protection zones. Thirteen criteria, which affect the reaching of the pollutants to the water surface and reflect the topographic, hydrological, and environmental characteristics of the basin, were used in the determination of the protection zones. As a result of the study, it was determined that 2.83% of the basin is in the absolute protection zone, 44.97% in the short-range protection zone, 35.93% in the medium-range protection zone and 16.26% in the long-range protection zone. In the last stage, the conservation areas determined by the current legal regulations for the basin and the protection zones determined by the model approach were spatially and areally compared. According to the results of the comparison, it was determined with the proposed protection model that the absolute protection, the short-range protection, and the medium-range protection zones increased areally, and the spatial distributions of these protection zones were shaped according to the structure of the basin.
Metrics
References
Afzali, A., Sabri, S., Rashid, M., Mohammad Vali Samani, J., & Ludin, A. N. M. (2014). Inter municipal landfill site selection using analytic network process. Water Resources Management, 28(8), 2179-2194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0605-3
Akdeniz, H.B., Yalpir, S., & Inam, S. (2023). Assessment of suitable shrimp farming site selection using geographical information system based Analytical Hierarchy Process in Turkey. Ocean & Coastal Management, 235, 106468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106468
Ake, G. E., Eba, A. E. L., Ble, L. O., Adebayo, A., Assi, J. J., Saley, M. B., & Biemi, J. (2020). Contribution of geomatics to the delimitation of protection perimeters: case of Agbo River in Agboville (South East of Côte d’Ivoire). Journal of Environmental Protection, 11(06), 470. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.116028
Akinbile, C. O. (2012). Environmental impact of landfill on groundwater quality and agricultural soils in Nigeria. Soil and Water Research, 7(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.17221/4/2011-SWR
Aller, L., Bennett, T., Lehr, J. H., Petty, R. J., & Hackett, G. (1987). DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 622s.
Anoh, K. A., Jourda, J. P., Kouamé, K. J., Koua, T. J. J., Eba, A. E., & Lazar, G. (2012). Demarcation of protection perimeters for surface waters of Taabo (Ivory Coast) watershed using GIS and multicriteria analysis. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 11(12).
Beskese, A., Demir, H. H., Ozcan, H. K., & Okten, H. E. (2015). Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(7), 3513-3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3635-5
Cay, T., & Uyan, M. (2013). Evaluation of reallocation criteria in land consolidation studies using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Land Use Policy, 30(1), 541-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.023
Codvelle, A., Ricard, J., & Schoen, R. (2001). Mapping the hazard of pollution of surface and groundwater by plant substances in the Midi-Pyrénées. Manual 46p.BRGM/RP-51456 FR.
Cicek, N., Ozonat, Ç., & Er, A. (2015). Drinking water protection studies in Turkey, Sustainable Watershed Management (143-150). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Deh, S. K., Kouame, K. J., Eba, A. E. L., Djemin, J. E., Kpan, A., & Jourda, J. P. (2017). Contribution of geographic information systems in protection zones delineation around a surface water resource in Adzope Region (Southeast of Côte d’Ivoire). Journal of Environmental Protection, 8(13), 1652. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2017.813102
Demiroglu, M., & Dowd, J. (2014). The utility of vulnerability maps and GIS in groundwater management: a case study. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 23(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-1205-6
Douay, D., & Lardieg, E. (2010). Délimitation des Aires d’Alimentation des captages prioritaires du bassin Adour Garonne. Méthodologie de cartographie de la vulnérabilité intrinsèque des captages d’eau superficielle, 28.
Eba, A. E. L., Kouamé, K. J., Jourda, J. P., Aké, G. E., Saley, M. B., Anoh, K. A., & Deh, S.K. (2013). Demarcation of surface water protection perimeters by using GIS: case of Gagnoa Reservoir in West Central of Côte d'Ivoire. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(4), 1311-1320.
EEA, (2018). Water is life. Kopenhag: European Environment Agency.
Erdogan, M., & Karaguzel, R. (2016). A new hydrogeologically based approach to determining protected areas in drinking water supply reservoirs: a case study in the Alasun subbasin (Burdur,Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4845-1
Feizizadeh, B., Roodposhti, M.S., Jankowski, P., & Blaschke, T. (2014). A GIS-based extended fuzzy multicriteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 73, 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.08.001
Garipagaoglu, N., & Uzun, M. (2021). Havza yönetiminin gelisim evreleri ve farklı modelleri. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education, 43, 338-357. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.816758
Gu, J. D. (2018). Mining, pollution, and site remediation. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 128, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.11.006
Han, Z., Ma, H., Shi, G., He, L., Wei, L., & Shi, Q. (2016). A review of groundwater contamination near municipal solid waste landfill sites in China. Science of the Total Environment, 569, 1255-1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.201
Hölting, B., & Coldewey, W.G. (2019). Hydrogeology. Springer textbooks in earth sciences, geography, and environment. Germany, 34, pp.
Kayastha, P., Dhital, M. R., & De Smedt, F. (2013). Application of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study from the Tinau watershed, west Nepal. Computers & Geosciences, 52, 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.11.003
Khan, S., Shahnaz, M., Jehan, N., Rehman, S., Shah, M. T., & Din, I. (2013). Drinking water quality and human health risk in Charsadda district, Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.016
Kunt, M., Gurbuzler, D., Erkal, İ. F., & Yıldırım, K. (2020). 6. Türkiye cevre durum raporu. Ankara: T.C. Cevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlıgı.
Kuru, A., & Tezer, A. (2020). Içme suyu havzası koruma sınırlarının belirlenmesine yeni yontem onerisi: Kırklareli barajı içme suyu havzası örnegi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 519-536.
Li, Y., Li, J., & Deng, C. (2014). Occurrence, characteristics, and leakage of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in leachate from municipal solid waste landfills in China. Environmental Pollution, 184, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.027
Macary, F., Balestrat, M., Puech, C., & Saudubray, F. (2007). Method to evaluate the spatial contamination potential due to agriculture of surface water at different space scaling: application on the Coteaux de Gascogne.
Menichini, M., Prato, S. D., Doveri, M., Ellero, A., Lelli, M., & Masetti G.et al. (2015). An integrated methodology to define protection zones for groundwater-based drinking water sources: an example from the Tuscany Region, Italy. Acque Sotterranee -Italian Journal of Groundwater, 4(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.7343/as102-15-0129
Mor, S., Ravindra, K., Dahiya, R. P., & Chandra, A. (2006). Leachate characterization and assessment of groundwater pollution near municipal solid waste landfill site. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 118(1), 435-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-1505-7
Muluk, Ç. B., Kurt, B., Turak, A., Turker, A., Calışkan, M. A., Balkız, O., & . . . Zeydanlı U (2013). Türkiye'de suyun durumu ve su yönetiminde yeni yaklasımlar: cevresel perspektif. Istanbul: Is Dunyası ve Surdurülebilir Kalkınma Dernegi - Doğa Koruma Dernegi.
OSIB, (2016). Iklim degisikliginin su kaynaklarına etkisi projesi. Ankara: T.C. Orman ve Su Isleri Bakanlıgı, Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü.
Ozdemir, A. (2020). Determination of protection zones in drinking water basins: a case study from Turkey, Sapanca Lake Basin. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79(8), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1266502008916-5
Ozdemir, A. (2021). A framework for drinking water basin protection. Water and Environment Journal, 35(4), 1362-1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12735
Ozdemir, F. Y., & Ozkan, O. S. (2007, March). Importance of geological characteristics at determining basin conservation borders: sample of Lake Beyşehir (Konya) basin. In International Congress on River Basin Management, Vol. 22, 24.
Ozturk, I., Tanık, A., Özabalı Sabuncugil, A, Ertürk, A., Ekdal, A., Yaykıran, S., & Kalfazade, M. (2016). Iklim degisikliginin su kaynaklarına etkisi projesi, hidrolojik modelleme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/00222496(77)90033-5
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Sisman, S., & Aydinoglu, A. C. (2020). Using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis techniques in the smart cities. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences.
Sisman, S., Akar, A. U., & Yalpir, S. (2021). The novelty hybrid model development proposal for mass appraisal of real estates in sustainable land management. Survey Review, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2021.1996797
Smahi, D., Hammoumi, O.E., Fekri, A. (2013). Assessment of the impact of the landfill on groundwater quality: a case study of the Mediouna Site, Casablanca, Morocco. J. Water Resour. Prot, 5, 440-445. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2013.54043
Thanh, L. N., & De Smedt, F. (2012). Application of an analytical hierarchical process approach for landslide susceptibility mapping in A Luoi district, Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(7), 1739-1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1397-x
TOB, (2018). Ulusal su planı (2019-2023). Ankara: T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı.
UNICEF, & WHO (2019). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene 2000-2017: Special focus on inequalities. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization.
Uyduranoglu Oktem, A., & Aksoy, A. (2014). Türkiye'nin su riskleri raporu. İstanbul: WWF Türkiye.
Vaidya, O.S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
WHO (2022). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first and second. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Yavuz, F., & Baycan, T. (2013). Use of swot and analytic hierarchy process integration as a participatory decision-making tool in watershed management. Procedia technology, 8, 134-143.
Yılmaz, E. (1999). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci kullanılarak çok kriterli karar verme problemlerinin çözümü. DOA Dergisi, 5, 95-122.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 