The Concept of ''Disability'' in Architecture as a Power and Ideology Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2016120234Keywords:
Power, Ideology, Disability, Accessibility, OtherizingAbstract
The concept of disability, which is well accepted around the world and seem to be a statement of positive discrimination at first, requires to become a current issue as an equality problem in architecture and society today. In fact, the definition of disability and its intellectual basis are major and still invisibile obstacles to obtain equal rights for everyone regarding architectural accessibility and participation in social life.
In this study, the intellectual basis of the concept of disability in social understanding has been explored to identify the main problem. It has been realised that this understanding, which is to be seen also in architectural practices, has occured as an issue of power and ideology. On one hand, the society itself generates the definitions, classifies people and creates hegemony based on consent, and on the other hand speaks up for resolving the problems caused by this classifications with a total inactivity. Strong ideologies, which ignore the problems of existing definitions, forms absolute truths and minds unable to question. Therefore, the definition of “disabled” becomes approved by the entire society, although it does not include inseperable parts of society such as children, patients or elderly. These ideologies result in a communal power created by free will insted of enforcement. In this manner, even individuals classified as “disabled” accept the legitimacy of this authority. However, existing of such an accepted definiton causes otherizing and ignorance in society. It also affects architectural perception and plays a significant role in creating isolation projects such as “disabled-friendly houses” or “libraries for disabled”. These projects show that people defined as “disabled” are the dark subconsciousness of society willing to be forgotten.
When it is realised that the unity of differences creates the society, the classification will be forgotten, environments and mentallities will be shaped accordingly and designs will be created for everyone instead of designing for disabled. Bringing an accurate and fair point of view into existence, which is based on the mentioned facts, is the only way to solve the current problems in architectural practices and social inequalities.
Metrics
References
Alver, K. 2012. Ütopya: Mekan ve Kentin İdeal Formu. Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 3 No:18 Sayfa: 141, İstanbul
Eagleton, T. 1996. İdeoloji. Çev: Muttalip Özcan, s.18, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul
Foucault, M. 1980. Two Lectures, Power/Knowledge. Pantheon Books, p.59, NY
Gümüş, A. 2011. Güç, İktidar, Sınıf ve Statü Üzerine Bazı Tartışmalar -Mühendis ve Öğretmen Örneği. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt:14 Sayı:1 Sayfa:72, Ankara
Hardy C. & O'Sullivan S. L. 1998. The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice. Human Relations, Vol:51 No:4: p.460, The Tavistock Institute, London
Huber, M. and Colleagues. 2011. How Should We Define Health? British Medical Journal, BMJ 2011;343:d4163
Marshall, G. 1999. Sosyoloji Sözlüğü. ‘Hegemonya’, Ayraç Yayınları, Ankara
Merquior, J. G. 1986. Foucault. Çev:Nurettin Elhüseyni, Afa Yayınları, s.148, İstanbul
Özyürek, M. 1988. Engelli Kişilere Yönelik Değiştirilen Tutumların Sürekliliği. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir
Platon. 1988. Devlet. Çev: Sabahattin Eyüboglu, M. Ali Cimcoz, s:64, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul
Riot-Sarcey, M. & Bouchet, T. & Picon, A. 2003. Ütopyalar Sözlüğü. Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul
Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı. 2013. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara
Sönmez Selçuk, S. 2012. Postmodern Dönemde Farklılığın Kutsanması ve Toplumun Parçacıllaştırılması:“Öteki” ve “Ötekileştirme”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt:15 Sayı:2 Sayfa:80, Ankara
Şentürk, L. 2008. ‘Molar Kafes’: Le Corbusier ve Modulor. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Journal of Faculty of Architecture, Cilt:25 Sayı:2 Sayfa:127, Ankara
TS 9111. Özürlüler Ve Hareket Kısıtlılığı Bulunan Kişiler İçin Binalarda Ulaşilabilirlik Gerekleri. Kasım 2011. Madde 3.2, Türk Standartları Enstitüsü
URL-1. Dunlap, D. W. 1997. Architecure in the Age of Accessibility. The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/1997/06/01/realestate/architecture-in-the-age-of-accessibility.html, Erişim Tarihi: 22 Nisan 2015
URL-2. Raf Ürün Dergisi Özürlülere Daha Yaşanabilir Bir Çevre Yaratmak İçin Kolları Sıvadı. http://v3.arkitera.com/h58760-raf-urun-dergisi-ozurlulere-daha-yasanabilir-bir-cevre-yaratmak-icin-kollari-sivadi.html, Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2015
URL-3. Azınlık Gruplar İçin Tasarım: Çocuklar, Yaşlılar ve Engelliler, http://www.dezavantaj.org/index.php/aratirmalar/8-engelli/1424-aznlk-gruplar-icin-tasarm-cocuklar-yallar-ve-engelliler, Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2015
URL-4. Official Records of World Health Organizations. 7 April 1948. No.2, p.100, http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html, Accessed on April 2, 2015
URL-5. Türk Dil Kurumu Güncel Türkçe Sözlük, “Engelli” Kelimesi, http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.553b51565b8734.69100839, Erişim tarihi: 2 Nisan 2015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.