Via Design Focused Thinking Model, Surface Design Specific to Corridors Used by Children with Cerebral Palsy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2023.272Keywords:
Cerebral palsy, creativity, design education, design focused model, surface designAbstract
The design that results from information processing is expressed through the use of numerous visual, verbal, or numerical parameters. Numerous methods, both traditional and contemporary, have been used in design education from the beginning to the present. Design thinking (d.school) is a model used to represent the cognitive process through which design concepts are developed. Among the experiential learning methods is the design thinking model, which has become popular in recent years. The use of a design-focused thinking model in interior architecture education is reviewed in this study to see what kind of contributions it makes to the emergence of creative ideas. The study aims to increase the student's creative thinking development potential in the design process, reveal concept development skills, develop original design skills, and, as a result, make a cognitive contribution to design education. The study included a total of twelve students from the interior architecture department, divided into three groups. All of the students involved in the research visited the Selcuk University Medical Faculty Hospital Mehmet Emin Bakdemir Cerebral Palsy Treatment Centre, which was chosen as the sample area. After defining the problem, the design-focused thinking method was used to create the wall surfaces of the corridor connecting the physical and treatment rooms, which are used by children with cerebral palsy. The procedure is divided into five stages. By performing various readings on the final designs that emerged, the development of creativity in students was observed. As a result of this study, which was conducted using the design thinking model, it was determined that the concept quality of the projects made increased. As a result, in concept studies where creativity is addressed in design education, it is recommended that the process be managed through experiential methods such as the design thinking method.
Metrics
References
Allison, D. (2007). Hospital as city: employing urban design strategies for effective wayfinding. Health Facilities Management, 20(6), 61-5.
Ambrose, G., Harris, P. (2009). Design Thinking. Ava Publishing, Switzerland.
Arık, E., S. (2019). Çocuk hastanelerinin bekleme alanında iç mekan değerleri üzerine bir inceleme. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Assaf, M. A. (2009). Teaching and thinking: a literature review of the teaching of thinking skills. Online Submission. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505029.pdf
Aydınlı, S. (2015). Tasarım eğitiminde yapılandırıcı paradigma: “Öğrenmeyi öğrenme”. Tasarım Kuram Dergisi. 11(20), 1-18.
Aydıntan, E. (2016). İç mekan yüzey tasarımlarında mesaj-kullanıcı ilişkisi üzerine deneysel bir irdeleme. Online Journal of Art and Design, 4(3), 41- 55.
Bacanlı, H., Dombaycı, M. A., Demir, M., & Tarhan, S. (2011). Quadruple thinking: creative thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 536-544.
Beşgen, A. (2015). Teaching/learning strategies through art: painting and basic design education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 420-427.
Boyer, E. L., Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building community: a new future for architecture education and practice: a special report. Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching, Princeton, NJ.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.
Canbakal Ataoğlu, N. (2009). Çağdaş mimaride bir antitez: sirkülasyon. Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
Cantwell, M. (2019). DEEP design thinking. Deep Design thinking. https://www. deepdesignthinking.com (20.02.2023).
Ching, F.D.K. (2002). Mimarlık biçim, mekân & düzen. (Gizem Parlak, Çev.). Nobel Yayınları, İstanbul.
Cutting, R. (1989). Gestalt theory and psychiatry: discussion paper. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. (82), 429-431.
Design Council. (2021). What is the framework for innovation? Design Council. https://www. designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/whatframework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond (20.02.2023).
Dikmen, O. (2012). Children's hospital schools as social environments and their effects on healing and well-being: case study ın izmir behçet uz children’s hospital school. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi, İzmir.
Dolata, M., Schwabe, G. (2016). Design thinking in is research projects. In Design thinking for innovation. Springer International Publishing.
Dorst, K. (2010). The nature of design thinking [Conference presentation abstract] DTRS8 Interpreting Design Thinking: Design Thinking Research Symposium Proceedings, 131-139.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K. (1975). Educator’s self-teaching guide to individualizing instructional programs. Parker Publishing Company, West Nyack, NY.
Education Commission. (2002). Progress report on the education reform (1). Hong Kong Education Bureau. https://www.e-c.edu.hk/eng/reform/report_html (20.02.2023).
Evcil, N. (2014). Herkes için tasarım. Boğaziçi Yayınları, İstanbul.
Goldman, S. (2002). Instructional design: Learning through design. Encyclopedia of Education, 1163-1169. Macmillan Reference, USA.
Goldstein, E. B. (2010). Encylopedia of perception. Sage Publishing, New York.
Güç, B., Gençel, Z., & Karadayı, A. (2013). Mekân, algı ve biliş bağlamında hastane tasarım dilini anlamak: SDÜ hastanesi örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(1), 133-146.
Güller, E. (2014). Zihinsel engelli çocuğun eğitiminde rehabilitasyon mekanlarındaki rengin etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
Hart, R. A., Moore, G. T. (1973). The development of spatial cognition: a review. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.
Hasol, D. (1993). Ansiklopedik mimarlık sözlüğü. (7. Bs.). YEM Yayın, İstanbul.
Heskett, J. (2003). Shaping the future: Design for Hong Kong–A strategic review of design education and Practice. The Design Task Force (DTF), School of Design, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Jersild, A. (1983). Çocuk psikolojisi (G. Günce, Çev.). Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara.
Kazanasmaz, T. (2004). Sağlık yapılarında yön bulma tasarımı, modern hastane yönetimi. Modern Hastane Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(2), 42-46.
Kesici, A. (2019). Eğitimde post modern durum: Yapılandırmacılık. İnsan ve İnsan. 20(6), 219- 238.
Kim, M. J., Ju, S. R., & Lee, L. (2015). A cross cultural and interdisciplinary collaboration in a joint design studio. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(1), 102-120.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B. & Hong, H. (2015). Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning. Springer International Publishing.
Liedtka, J. (2018). Exploring the Impact of Design Thinking in Action. Darden Working Paper Series.
Lindberg, T., Noweski, C. & Meinel, C. (2010). Evolving discourses on design thinking: How design cognition inspires meta-disciplinary creative collaboration. Technoetic Arts A Journal of Speculative Research, 8(1), 31–37.
Luka, I. (2014). Design thinking in pedagogy. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 2, 63-74.
Moirano, R., Sánchez, M. A. & Štěpánek, L. (2019). Creative interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity.
Müezzinoğlu, K., Noraslı, M. (2022). İç mekan tasarımında tasarım odaklı düşünme modeli; Kırmızılı kadın belgeseli. Bodrum Journal of Atr and Design, 1(1), 17-28.
Nasab, S. N., Azeri, A. R. K. & Mirbazel, A. (2020). Effective environmental factors for reducing children’s fear in children’s hospital: using parent’s attitudes. International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 8(1), 1-19.
Okuyucu, Ş. E., Çoban, G. (2019). İç mimarlık atölyelerinin deneyimlenmesi. Journal of Near Architecture, 2(2), 103-117.
Onur, D. (2016). Tasarım eğitiminde farkındalık ve yaratıcılık gelişimine yönelik bir öneri. Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.
Öneş, K., Çelik, B., Çağlar, N., Gültekin, Ö., Yılmaz, E., & Çetinkaya, B. (2008). Serebral palsi polikliniğine müracaat eden hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 54(1), 13-16.
Pallasmaa, J. (2018). Tenin gözleri: mimarlık ve duyular. (Aziz Ufuk, Çev.). YEM Yayın, İstanbul.
Pande, M., Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-Identıty: Physıcal World Socıalızatıon Of The Self. Journal Of Environmental Psychology. 3(1), 57-83.
Ramm, J., Tjøtta, S., & Torsvik, G. (2013). Incentives and creativity in groups. University of Stavanger.http://www.uis.no/getfile.php/13115229/Forskning/Bilder/09%20%C3%98konomi/ (20.02.2023).
Razzouk, R., Shute, V. (2012). Design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
San, İ. (2004). Sanat ve eğitim. Ütopya Yayınevi.
Sayın, T. (2007). Mimari tasarım eğitimine bütüncül / metaforik bir yaklaşım. Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Teixeira, C. (2010). The entrepreneurial design curriculum: Design-based learning for knowledge-based economies. Design Studies, 31, 411-418.
The Interaction Design Foundation [IDF] (2020). 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5- stages-in-the-design-thinking-process (20.02.2023).
Tucker, R., Abbasi, N. (2015). The architecture of teamwork: examining relationships between teaching, assessment, student learning and satisfaction with creative design outcomes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(6), 405-422.
Tunalı, İ. (2004). Tasarım felsefesine giriş. Yapı Yayınları, İstanbul.
Ulusoy, Z. (1999). To design versus to understand design: the role of graphic representations and verbal expressions. Design Studies, 20(2), 123-130.
Uslu, A., Shakouri, N. (2012). Engelli çocuklara dost oyun alanı ve dış mekan tasarımı. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(5):367-374.
Ünlü, A., Edgü, E., Ülken, G., & Apak, S. (2008). Acil durumlarda hastane sirkülasyon sistemlerinin performansı için bir model. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(1), 99-109.
Vanada, D. I. (2014). Practically creative: The role of design thinking as an improved paradigm for 21st century art education. Techne Series A, 21(2), 21-33.
Wrigley, C., Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385.
Yılmaz, Ö. (2004). Mimari Mekanda Görsel Algı ve Manipülasyon İlişkilerinin İrdelenmesi. Yüksek Lisan Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT POLICY
1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.
2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.
The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.
If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.
The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues.
The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs.
3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles.
4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material.
5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name.
6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.
ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by 