‘FLOATING PUBLIC SPACE’ FOR BIRDS: DESIGN RESEARCH AND PROTOTYPE FABRICATION IN HALIÇ

Kutay Karabağ, Zeynep Şahbaz

Abstract


Purpose

This text intends to discuss the outcome of the graduate design studio titled ‘hydrophilic structures’. Studio research is organized on two primary axis; revealing the potentials of floating spaces as an extension of public spaces on one hand, and digital design and fabrication technologies for prototyping on the other. Concepts such as floating structures, water interaction and public space may initially refer to human utilization however, non-human living organisms are critical for their decisive role on the qualities of the water and the urban environment.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Design of floating structures and water interaction had been a niche inside the traditional culture and practice of architectural design, whereas design and production skills in connection with water had historically developed mostly in the field of engineering and transportation. Floating structures and their potential for unconventional spatial experiences have recently engaged in the focus of contemporary design culture, mainly due to the increasing density and lack of public spaces on the land.

Findings

The proposal, designed through computational tools and fabricated through robotic technology, concentrates on various ways of interaction with water and acknowledge research on the spatial requirements for the birds, as the users of space.

Research Limitations/Implications

Fabrication of the floating prototype is assumed as a primary target for its observation potential enabling an original discussion of the design parameters for bird species. Limitations of the existing fabrication tools and sustainability of the practically available materials were assumed to be out of the scope of this study.

Social/Practical Implications

Design-research presented here covers principal case-studies of floating spaces, the buoyancy principles, material tests and essential variables of ecological dynamics in Haliç as a general framework.

Originality/Value

The subsequent prototype serves for a specific bird population utilizing Haliç as a part of their life cycle, rather than human utilization.

 


Keywords


Floating structures, hydrophilic design, robotic fabrication, floating space, Haliç

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adey, W. H. & Loveland, K. (2007). Dynamic Aquaria: Building and restoring living ecosystems. Londra, UK: Academic.

Aksoy, A. & Açıkbaş, F. & Akman, A. (2007). Silahtarağa Elektrik Santrali’nin Hikayesi 1910-2004. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.

Akyıldız, A. (2007). Haliç'te Seyrüsefer Haliç Vapurları Şirketi. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.

Berke, J. (2018). A New ‘Floating Park’ Made Out of Recycled Plastic Waste Has Popped Up In The Netherlands. Business Insider.

Boyla, K. A., Arslan, M., editors (2008). İstanbul’un Kuşları: 2000-2007, İstanbul, Turkey. İstanbul Kuş Gözlem Topluluğu. (in Turkish).

Boyla, K. A. (2019). Türkiye Üreyen Kuş Atlası-WWF Rapor. İstanbul, editor: Per, E.& Yavuz, K. E., Türkiye Doğal Hayatı Koruma Vakfı.

Coccon, F., Borella, S., Simeoni, N., & Malavasi, S. (2018). Floating rafts as breeding habitats for the Common tern, Sterna hirundo, Colonization patterns, abundance and reproductive success in Venice Lagoon. Rivista Italiana Di Ornitologia, 88(1), 23-32.

Çelik, Z. (1998). 19. Yüzyılda Osmanlı Başkenti; Değişen İstanbul. Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı-Numune Matbaacılık.

De Jong, T. M., & Drake, B. G. (1981). Seasonal patterns of plant and soil water potential on an irregularly-flooded tidal marsh. Aquatic Botany, Volume 11, 1-9.

Evren, B. (2000). İstanbul'un Deniz Hamamları ve Plajları. Seçkin İstanbul Kitaplığı. İnkılap Yayınevi, İstanbul.

Güngör, N. (1996). Seyyahların Kaleminden Şehr-i Şirin İstanbul. İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları.

Koçu, R. E. (1966). Darphane, İstanbul Ansiklopedisi. 8. Cilt, Koçu Yayınları. İstanbul.

Köksal, T. G. & Ahunbay, Z. (2010). İstanbul'daki Endüstri Mirası İçin Koruma ve Yeniden Kullanım Önerileri. İtüdergisi/a, 5(2).

Masters, D. G., & Norman, H. C. (2016). Genetic and Environmental Management of Halophytes for Improved Livestock Production. In Halophytes for Food Security in Dry Lands, Academic Press, 243-257.

Ravenscroft, T. (2019). SO? Builds prototype floating house for post-earthquake Istanbul. Dezeen. access address: https://www.dezeen.com/2019/01/03/so-prototype-floating-house-earthquake-istanbul/

Riise, J., Adeyemi, K. (2015). Case study: Makoko floating school. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,Volume 13, 58-60, April.

Tutel, E. (2000). Haliç: dünden bugüne yedi tepenin koynunda uyuyan büyülü cennet. Dünya Yayıncılık.

Yılmaz, G. I. (2008). Haliç Kıyı Şeridinde Sanayileşme ile Ortaya Çıkan Kentsel Dönüşüm, Rölöve Restorasyon Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

URL – 1 TRAKUS Türkiye’nin Anonim Kuşları. Gray Heron Habitats. https://www.trakus.org/kods_bird/uye/?fsx=2fsdl17@d&tur=Gri%20bal%FDk%E7%FDl

URL – 2 Sutopya. Fox Tail Plant/ Ceratophyllum Demersum. https://sutopya.com/tag/tilki-kuyrugu/

URL – 3 İSKİ Report. (2019, September 13). Water Quality Report 2019. Istanbul Water and Sewerage Administration. https://www.iski.gov.tr/web/assets/SayfalarDocs/sukalite/WATERQUALITY_MAY2019.pdf.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2020.146
Fatal error: Call to undefined function curl_init() in /var/www/html/iconarp/lib/pkp/classes/webservice/WebService.inc.php on line 198